Noisy Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation (Stochastic Resonance) Changes Electroencephalography Activities and Postural Control in Patients with Bilateral Vestibular Hypofunction.
bilateral vestibular hypofunction (BVH)
electroencephalography (EEG)
galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS)
independent component analysis (ICA)
Journal
Brain sciences
ISSN: 2076-3425
Titre abrégé: Brain Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101598646
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Oct 2020
15 Oct 2020
Historique:
received:
23
09
2020
revised:
10
10
2020
accepted:
13
10
2020
entrez:
20
10
2020
pubmed:
21
10
2020
medline:
21
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Patients with bilateral vestibular hypofunction (BVH) often suffer from imbalance, gait problems, and oscillopsia. Noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS), a technique that non-invasively stimulates the vestibular afferents, has been shown to enhance postural and walking stability. However, no study has investigated how it affects stability and neural activities while standing and walking with a 2 Hz head yaw turning. Herein, we investigated this issue by comparing differences in neural activities during standing and walking with a 2 Hz head turning, before and after noisy GVS. We applied zero-mean gaussian white noise signal stimulations in the mastoid processes of 10 healthy individuals and seven patients with BVH, and simultaneously recorded electroencephalography (EEG) signals with 32 channels. We analyzed the root mean square (RMS) of the center of pressure (COP) sway during 30 s of standing, utilizing AMTI force plates (Advanced Mechanical Technology Inc., Watertown, MA, USA). Head rotation quality when walking with a 2 Hz head yaw, with and without GVS, was analyzed using a VICON system (Vicon Motion Systems Ltd., Oxford, UK) to evaluate GVS effects on static and dynamic postural control. The RMS of COP sway was significantly reduced during GVS while standing, for both patients and healthy subjects. During walking, 2 Hz head yaw movements was significantly improved by noisy GVS in both groups. Accordingly, the EEG power of theta, alpha, beta, and gamma bands significantly increased in the left parietal lobe after noisy GVS during walking and standing in both groups. GVS post-stimulation effect changed EEG activities in the left and right precentral gyrus, and the right parietal lobe. After stimulation, EEG activity changes were greater in healthy subjects than in patients. Our findings reveal noisy GVS as a non-invasive therapeutic alternative to improve postural stability in patients with BVH. This novel approach provides insight to clinicians and researchers on brain activities during noisy GVS in standing and walking conditions in both healthy and BVH patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33076417
pii: brainsci10100740
doi: 10.3390/brainsci10100740
pmc: PMC7602631
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Feb 15;34(4):316-21
pubmed: 19214090
Brain. 1998 Dec;121 ( Pt 12):2271-99
pubmed: 9874480
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1997 Feb;68(2):111-7
pubmed: 9125086
Neuroimage. 2012 Mar;60(1):162-9
pubmed: 22209784
Brain Res. 2000 Jun 30;869(1-2):251-5
pubmed: 10865084
J Neurophysiol. 1984 Jun;51(6):1236-56
pubmed: 6737029
J Neurosci. 2007 Feb 28;27(9):2424-32
pubmed: 17329441
Vis Neurosci. 2012 Sep;29(4-5):255-62
pubmed: 22697300
Neurology. 2016 Jun 7;86(23):2196-202
pubmed: 27164706
Front Neurol. 2018 Oct 22;9:900
pubmed: 30405522
J Neurophysiol. 2004 Jun;91(6):2429-36
pubmed: 14736865
J Neurosci. 1991 Jun;11(6):1636-48
pubmed: 2045879
Neuroimage. 2011 Mar 15;55(2):644-57
pubmed: 21146614
J Neurophysiol. 1996 Jul;76(1):642-5
pubmed: 8836253
Clin Neurophysiol. 2005 Mar;116(3):708-15
pubmed: 15721085
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 May 02;10:185
pubmed: 27199708
Prog Brain Res. 1972;37:243-62
pubmed: 4642044
Trends Neurosci. 1998 Jun;21(6):254-9
pubmed: 9641538
Lancet. 2003 Oct 4;362(9390):1123-4
pubmed: 14550702
Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 May;8(5):204-10
pubmed: 15120678
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Oct 27;9:593
pubmed: 26578937
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1993 Jan;86(1):23-35
pubmed: 7678388
Brain Stimul. 2018 Jul - Aug;11(4):716-722
pubmed: 29656906
J Neurol. 2008 Nov;255(11):1657-61
pubmed: 18677633
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2006 Aug;16(4):385-90
pubmed: 16842990
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Mar 01;12:27
pubmed: 29545745
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Jun;150(6):1040-2
pubmed: 24647642
Sci Rep. 2016 Nov 21;6:37575
pubmed: 27869225
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Jul 08;8:485
pubmed: 25071515
Neuron. 1998 Mar;20(3):495-508
pubmed: 9539124
J Vestib Res. 2012;22(1):3-9
pubmed: 22699147
Science. 1985 May 10;228(4700):750-2
pubmed: 3992243
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999 May 28;871:313-23
pubmed: 10372081
Prog Neurobiol. 2001 Aug;64(6):527-53
pubmed: 11311461
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2012;2012:2764-7
pubmed: 23366498
J Vestib Res. 2009;19(3-4):137-42
pubmed: 20448339
Clin Neurophysiol. 2000 Oct;111(10):1745-58
pubmed: 11018488
Nature. 1995 Jul 20;376(6537):236-8
pubmed: 7617033
Neuroimage Clin. 2019;24:101942
pubmed: 31382239
Neuroscience. 2012 Jun 14;212:159-79
pubmed: 22516007
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 18;8(7):e69055
pubmed: 23874865
Front Neurol. 2017 Feb 03;8:26
pubmed: 28217106
Neuroimage. 2017 Jul 15;155:50-59
pubmed: 28254458
Ann Neurol. 2005 Aug;58(2):175-81
pubmed: 16049932
Neurology. 2014 Mar 18;82(11):969-75
pubmed: 24532279
Neuroreport. 2014 Dec 17;25(18):1433-6
pubmed: 25383460
J Neurol. 2017 Oct;264(Suppl 1):81-86
pubmed: 28391373
J Neurosci Methods. 2004 Mar 15;134(1):9-21
pubmed: 15102499