Linked Color Imaging Focused on Neoplasm Detection in the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract : A Randomized Trial.
Journal
Annals of internal medicine
ISSN: 1539-3704
Titre abrégé: Ann Intern Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0372351
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2021
01 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
21
10
2020
medline:
10
2
2021
entrez:
20
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Linked color imaging (LCI) is a new image-enhanced endoscopy technique that allows users to recognize slight differences in mucosal color. To compare the performance of LCI with white light imaging (WLI) in detecting neoplastic lesions in the upper gastrointestinal tract. A controlled, multicenter trial with randomization using minimization. (University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry: UMIN000023863). 16 university hospitals and 3 tertiary care hospitals in Japan. 1502 patients with known previous or current cancer of the gastrointestinal tract and undergoing surveillance for gastrointestinal cancer. WLI followed by LCI examination (WLI group) or LCI followed by WLI examination (LCI group). Diagnosis of 1 or more neoplastic lesions in the pharynx, esophagus, or stomach in the first examination (primary outcome) and 1 or more neoplastic lesions overlooked in the first examination (secondary outcome). 752 patients were assigned to the WLI group and 750 to the LCI group. The percentage of patients with 1 or more neoplastic lesions diagnosed in the first examination was higher with LCI than with WLI (60 of 750 patients or 8.0% [95% CI, 6.2% to 10.2%] vs. 36 of 752 patients or 4.8% [CI, 3.4% to 6.6%]; risk ratio, 1.67 [CI, 1.12 to 2.50; Endoscopists were not blinded. LCI is more effective than WLI for detecting neoplastic lesions in the pharynx, esophagus, and stomach. Fujifilm Corporation.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Linked color imaging (LCI) is a new image-enhanced endoscopy technique that allows users to recognize slight differences in mucosal color.
OBJECTIVE
To compare the performance of LCI with white light imaging (WLI) in detecting neoplastic lesions in the upper gastrointestinal tract.
DESIGN
A controlled, multicenter trial with randomization using minimization. (University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry: UMIN000023863).
SETTING
16 university hospitals and 3 tertiary care hospitals in Japan.
PATIENTS
1502 patients with known previous or current cancer of the gastrointestinal tract and undergoing surveillance for gastrointestinal cancer.
INTERVENTION
WLI followed by LCI examination (WLI group) or LCI followed by WLI examination (LCI group).
MEASUREMENTS
Diagnosis of 1 or more neoplastic lesions in the pharynx, esophagus, or stomach in the first examination (primary outcome) and 1 or more neoplastic lesions overlooked in the first examination (secondary outcome).
RESULTS
752 patients were assigned to the WLI group and 750 to the LCI group. The percentage of patients with 1 or more neoplastic lesions diagnosed in the first examination was higher with LCI than with WLI (60 of 750 patients or 8.0% [95% CI, 6.2% to 10.2%] vs. 36 of 752 patients or 4.8% [CI, 3.4% to 6.6%]; risk ratio, 1.67 [CI, 1.12 to 2.50;
LIMITATION
Endoscopists were not blinded.
CONCLUSION
LCI is more effective than WLI for detecting neoplastic lesions in the pharynx, esophagus, and stomach.
PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE
Fujifilm Corporation.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
18-24Investigateurs
Yuichi Shimizu
(Y)
Satoshi Abiko
(S)
Keiko Yamamoto
(K)
Takahiko Kudo
(T)
Kana Matsuda
(K)
Kazuhiro Kamada
(K)
Takahiro Nakano
(T)
Kei Terasaki
(K)
Shun Takayama
(S)
Kazayuki Ogita
(K)
Yasuaki Nakajima
(Y)
Tetsuji Takayama
(T)
Hironori Wada
(H)
Masanori Takehara
(M)
Kaizou Kagemoto
(K)
Fumika Nakamura
(F)
Atsushi Masamune
(A)
Waku Hatta
(W)
Hiroyuki Okada
(H)
Masaya Iwamuro
(M)
Makoto Abe
(M)
Tatsuhiro Gotoda
(T)
Hiroyuki Sakae
(H)
Akiko Shiotani
(A)
Hiroshi Matsumoto
(H)
Minoru Fujita
(M)
Motoyasu Oosawa
(M)
Tatsushi Omatsu
(T)
Takeshi Yasuda
(T)
Akio Ido
(A)
Hidehito Maeda
(H)
Masayuki Kabayama
(M)
Ken Ohnita
(K)
Kazuhiko Nakao
(K)
Shinji Tanaka
(S)
Takahiro Kotachi
(T)
Akifumi Fukui
(A)
Akito Harusato
(A)
Kouhei Oka
(K)
Takashi Akutagawa
(T)
Kazunari Murakami
(K)
Ryo Ogawa
(R)
Hirofumi Kawamoto
(H)
Ken Haruma
(K)
Kazuhide Higuchi
(K)
Yuichi Kojima
(Y)
Kazuhiro Ota
(K)
Katsuhiro Mabe
(K)
Kimitoshi Kubo
(K)