Designing and piloting a generic research architecture and workflows to unlock German primary care data for secondary use.
Data management architecture
Electronic health records
GDPR
Health information exchange
Informed consent
Medical record linkage
Primary health care
Secondary use
Trusted third party
Journal
Journal of translational medicine
ISSN: 1479-5876
Titre abrégé: J Transl Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101190741
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 10 2020
19 10 2020
Historique:
received:
26
06
2020
accepted:
23
09
2020
entrez:
20
10
2020
pubmed:
21
10
2020
medline:
15
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Medical data from family doctors are of great importance to health care researchers but seem to be locked in German practices and, thus, are underused in research. The RADAR project (Routine Anonymized Data for Advanced Health Services Research) aims at designing, implementing and piloting a generic research architecture, technical software solutions as well as procedures and workflows to unlock data from family doctor's practices. A long-term medical data repository for research taking legal requirements into account is established. Thereby, RADAR helps closing the gap between the European countries and to contribute data from primary care in Germany. The RADAR project comprises three phases: (1) analysis phase, (2) design phase, and (3) pilot. First, interdisciplinary workshops were held to list prerequisites and requirements. Second, an architecture diagram with building blocks and functions, and an ordered list of process steps (workflow) for data capture and storage were designed. Third, technical components and workflows were piloted. The pilot was extended by a data integration workflow using patient-reported outcomes (paper-based questionnaires). The analysis phase resulted in listing 17 essential prerequisites and guiding requirements for data management compliant with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Based on this list existing approaches to fulfil the RADAR tasks were evaluated-for example, re-using BDT interface for data exchange and Trusted Third Party-approach for consent management and record linkage. Consented data sets of 100 patients were successfully exported, separated into person-identifying and medical data, pseudonymised and saved. Record linkage and data integration workflows for patient-reported outcomes in the RADAR research database were successfully piloted for 63 responders. The RADAR project successfully developed a generic architecture together with a technical framework of tools, interfaces, and workflows for a complete infrastructure for practicable and secure processing of patient data from family doctors. All technical components and workflows can be reused for further research projects. Additionally, a Trusted Third Party-approach can be used as core element to implement data privacy protection in such heterogeneous family doctor's settings. Optimisations identified comprise a fully-electronic consent recording using tablet computers, which is part of the project's extension phase.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Medical data from family doctors are of great importance to health care researchers but seem to be locked in German practices and, thus, are underused in research. The RADAR project (Routine Anonymized Data for Advanced Health Services Research) aims at designing, implementing and piloting a generic research architecture, technical software solutions as well as procedures and workflows to unlock data from family doctor's practices. A long-term medical data repository for research taking legal requirements into account is established. Thereby, RADAR helps closing the gap between the European countries and to contribute data from primary care in Germany.
METHODS
The RADAR project comprises three phases: (1) analysis phase, (2) design phase, and (3) pilot. First, interdisciplinary workshops were held to list prerequisites and requirements. Second, an architecture diagram with building blocks and functions, and an ordered list of process steps (workflow) for data capture and storage were designed. Third, technical components and workflows were piloted. The pilot was extended by a data integration workflow using patient-reported outcomes (paper-based questionnaires).
RESULTS
The analysis phase resulted in listing 17 essential prerequisites and guiding requirements for data management compliant with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Based on this list existing approaches to fulfil the RADAR tasks were evaluated-for example, re-using BDT interface for data exchange and Trusted Third Party-approach for consent management and record linkage. Consented data sets of 100 patients were successfully exported, separated into person-identifying and medical data, pseudonymised and saved. Record linkage and data integration workflows for patient-reported outcomes in the RADAR research database were successfully piloted for 63 responders.
CONCLUSION
The RADAR project successfully developed a generic architecture together with a technical framework of tools, interfaces, and workflows for a complete infrastructure for practicable and secure processing of patient data from family doctors. All technical components and workflows can be reused for further research projects. Additionally, a Trusted Third Party-approach can be used as core element to implement data privacy protection in such heterogeneous family doctor's settings. Optimisations identified comprise a fully-electronic consent recording using tablet computers, which is part of the project's extension phase.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33076938
doi: 10.1186/s12967-020-02547-x
pii: 10.1186/s12967-020-02547-x
pmc: PMC7574413
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
394Références
Gesundheitswesen. 2018 Nov;80(11):1026-1034
pubmed: 28697524
Gesundheitswesen. 2003 Feb;65(2):109-14
pubmed: 12632320
Gesundheitswesen. 2010 Jun;72(6):323-31
pubmed: 20491004
J Transl Med. 2015 Jun 04;13:176
pubmed: 26040848
Gesundheitswesen. 2018 Nov;80(11):987-993
pubmed: 30273938
Eur J Epidemiol. 2014 May;29(5):371-82
pubmed: 24840228
Gesundheitswesen. 2007 Dec;69(12):679-85
pubmed: 18181071
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2008;102(5):313-9
pubmed: 19006919
Scand J Public Health. 2011 Jul;39(7 Suppl):30-3
pubmed: 21775347
ESC Heart Fail. 2017 Nov;4(4):440-447
pubmed: 28742243
Methods Inf Med. 2015;54(4):364-371
pubmed: 26196494
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Jun;44(3):827-36
pubmed: 26050254
Scand J Public Health. 2011 Jul;39(7 Suppl):34-7
pubmed: 21775348
Gesundheitswesen. 2010 Jun;72(6):332-9
pubmed: 20440676