A phase II randomised, placebo-controlled trial of low dose (metronomic) cyclophosphamide and nintedanib (BIBF1120) in advanced ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer.
Administration, Metronomic
Administration, Oral
Aged
Angiogenesis Inhibitors
/ administration & dosage
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ administration & dosage
Cyclophosphamide
/ administration & dosage
Fallopian Tube Neoplasms
/ diagnosis
Female
Humans
Indoles
/ administration & dosage
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Staging
Ovarian Neoplasms
/ diagnosis
Peritoneal Neoplasms
/ diagnosis
Progression-Free Survival
Quality of Life
Late stage relapsed ovarian cancer
Nintedanib
Oral cyclophosphamide
Prior bevacizumab
Journal
Gynecologic oncology
ISSN: 1095-6859
Titre abrégé: Gynecol Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0365304
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2020
12 2020
Historique:
received:
02
03
2020
accepted:
27
09
2020
pubmed:
21
10
2020
medline:
17
4
2021
entrez:
20
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We investigated the safety and efficacy of a combination of the oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor, nintedanib (BIBF 1120) with oral cyclophosphamide in patients with relapsed ovarian cancer. Patients with relapsed ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer received oral cyclophosphamide (100 mg o.d.) and were randomised (1,1) to also have either oral nintedanib or placebo. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included progression free survival (PFS), response rate, toxicity, and quality of life. 117 patients were randomised, 3 did not start trial treatment, median age 64 years. Forty-five (39%) had received ≥5 lines chemotherapy. 30% had received prior bevacizumab. The median OS was 6.8 (nintedanib) versus 6.4 (placebo) months (hazard ratio 1.08; 95% confidence interval 0.72-1.62; P = 0.72). The 6-month PFS rate was 29.6% versus 22.8% (P = 0.57). Grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 64% (nintedanib) versus 54% (placebo) of patients (P = 0.28); the most frequent G3/4 toxicities were lymphopenia (18.6% nintedanib versus 16.4% placebo), diarrhoea (13.6% versus 0%), neutropenia (11.9% versus 0%), fatigue (10.2% versus 9.1%), and vomiting (10.2% versus 7.3%). Patients who had received prior bevacizumab treatment had 52 days less time on treatment (P < 0.01). 26 patients (23%) took oral cyclophosphamide for ≥6 months. There were no differences in quality of life between treatment arms. This is the largest reported cohort of patients with relapsed ovarian cancer treated with oral cyclophosphamide. Nintedanib did not improve outcomes when added to oral cyclophosphamide. Although not significant, more patients than expected remained on treatment for ≥6 months. This may reflect a higher proportion of patients with more indolent disease or the higher dose of cyclophosphamide used. Clinicaltrials.govNCT01610869.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
We investigated the safety and efficacy of a combination of the oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor, nintedanib (BIBF 1120) with oral cyclophosphamide in patients with relapsed ovarian cancer.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Patients with relapsed ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer received oral cyclophosphamide (100 mg o.d.) and were randomised (1,1) to also have either oral nintedanib or placebo. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included progression free survival (PFS), response rate, toxicity, and quality of life.
RESULTS
117 patients were randomised, 3 did not start trial treatment, median age 64 years. Forty-five (39%) had received ≥5 lines chemotherapy. 30% had received prior bevacizumab. The median OS was 6.8 (nintedanib) versus 6.4 (placebo) months (hazard ratio 1.08; 95% confidence interval 0.72-1.62; P = 0.72). The 6-month PFS rate was 29.6% versus 22.8% (P = 0.57). Grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 64% (nintedanib) versus 54% (placebo) of patients (P = 0.28); the most frequent G3/4 toxicities were lymphopenia (18.6% nintedanib versus 16.4% placebo), diarrhoea (13.6% versus 0%), neutropenia (11.9% versus 0%), fatigue (10.2% versus 9.1%), and vomiting (10.2% versus 7.3%). Patients who had received prior bevacizumab treatment had 52 days less time on treatment (P < 0.01). 26 patients (23%) took oral cyclophosphamide for ≥6 months. There were no differences in quality of life between treatment arms.
CONCLUSIONS
This is the largest reported cohort of patients with relapsed ovarian cancer treated with oral cyclophosphamide. Nintedanib did not improve outcomes when added to oral cyclophosphamide. Although not significant, more patients than expected remained on treatment for ≥6 months. This may reflect a higher proportion of patients with more indolent disease or the higher dose of cyclophosphamide used.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION
Clinicaltrials.govNCT01610869.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33077258
pii: S0090-8258(20)33958-5
doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.09.048
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Angiogenesis Inhibitors
0
Indoles
0
Cyclophosphamide
8N3DW7272P
nintedanib
G6HRD2P839
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01610869']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
692-698Subventions
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : 13359
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : C21279/A13359
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest Professor Marcia Hall reports grants and personal fees from Clovis Oncology, BMS and Merck and personal fees from Roche, GSK/Tesaro, Astra Zeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim and Amgen outside the submitted work. Dr. Susana Banerjee reports personal fees from Roche, AstraZeneca, GSK/Tesaro, Clovis Oncology, Pharmamar, Seattle Genetics, Merck Serono, Amgen and Genmab; grants from Astra Zeneca and GSK/Tesaro and travel support from Nucana all outside the submitted work. Dr. Rosemary Lord reports personal fees from Tesaro and Astra Zeneca, outside the submitted work. Dr. Andrew Clamp has received research funding and personal fees from Astra Zeneca, and personal fees from Clovis Oncology, Astra Zeneca, GSK/Tesaro, and Roche outside the submitted work. Dr. Shibani Nicum reports grants and personal fees from Astra Zeneca and personal fees from MSD, Roche, Abbvie, Clovis Oncology outside the submitted work. Professor J Ledermann has received fees for Advisory Boards, lectures, symposia from Boehringer Ingelheim, Astra Zeneca, MSD/Merck, Amgen, Artios, GSK/Tesaro, Eisai. He has received research funding from MSD/Merck and AstraZeneca, all outside the submitted work. Dr. Rebecca Bowen reports personal fees from Roche, AstraZeneca, GSK/Tesaro, Clovis Oncology, Amgen, Celgene and Lily Oncology, outside the submitted work. Dr. Agniescka Michael reports personal fees from Roche, outside the submitted work. Dr. Ros Glasspool reports research funding from Boehringer Ingelheim for the NiCCC clinical trial, further research funding from Lilly/Ignyta and personal fees from AstraZeneca, MSD, Clovis, GSK/Tesaro, Immunogen and Sotio outside the submitted work. Professor Gordon Rustin reports personal fees from Abbvie, outside the submitted work.