Cystocele Repair by a Modified Surgical Technique of Bilateral Pubococcygeus Plication: Long-Term Surgical and Functional Results.
anterior vaginal wall defect repair
cystocele repair
native tissue repair
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 Oct 2020
16 Oct 2020
Historique:
received:
23
09
2020
revised:
30
09
2020
accepted:
15
10
2020
entrez:
21
10
2020
pubmed:
22
10
2020
medline:
22
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Here we describe our modified surgical technique of bilateral pubococcygeus plication (BPCP) for cystocele repair and assess its safety and long-term outcomes. This is a prospective study of 147 consecutive women who underwent BPCP for cystocele between January 2010 to January 2018. Inclusion criteria was naïve women with symptomatic cystocele ≥ POP-Q 2nd stage. Exclusion criteria: stress urinary incontinence (SUI), urgency urinary incontinence, other associated vaginal wall prolapses ≥ stage 2, neurological diseases, previous SUI surgeries, and previous radiation/surgery of the pelvic area. BPCP was performed by obtaining the medialization of the pubococcygeus muscle fibers of the right and left sides. Statistical analysis was performed. Objective cure was POP-Q < 2nd stage. Subjective cure and functional outcomes were evaluated by validated questionnaires. Patient's satisfaction was assessed by a Likert-type scale. Mean operative time was 64 min. At a mean follow-up of 82.4 months, objective and subjective success rates were 89.8% and 92.2% respectively. De novo urgency was 3.2%. Surgery did not alter sexual function. Complications occurred in 4.8%, and were: wrong dissection plane, hematoma, and pain lasting between 24-72 h. BPCP for correction of cystocele is safe and effective, with limited risk of complication and good long-term results.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33081090
pii: jcm9103318
doi: 10.3390/jcm9103318
pmc: PMC7602712
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Lancet. 2017 Jan 28;389(10067):381-392
pubmed: 28010989
Curr Urol Rep. 2019 Oct 14;20(11):70
pubmed: 31612341
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Dec;185(6):1299-304; discussion 1304-6
pubmed: 11744900
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Jul;29(7):943-948
pubmed: 29845304
Int J Biol Macromol. 2020 Apr 1;148:501-509
pubmed: 31958554
Eur Urol. 2006 Jun;49(6):1079-86
pubmed: 16460875
Neurourol Urodyn. 2018 Jan;37(1):278-283
pubmed: 28464362
J Sex Med. 2014 Feb;11(2):447-53
pubmed: 24224761
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2005 Mar;271(3):195-9
pubmed: 15290166
Neurourol Urodyn. 2016 Feb;35(2):137-68
pubmed: 26749391
J Urol. 2015 Sep;194(3):721-7
pubmed: 25837536
Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Apr;31(4):745-753
pubmed: 31506808
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Dec;48(6):681-692
pubmed: 26865209
BJOG. 2000 Apr;107(4):544-51
pubmed: 10759276
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Jun;184(7):1357-62; discussion 1362-4
pubmed: 11408853
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jul;197(1):82.e1-4
pubmed: 17618768
J Urol. 2007 Jul;178(1):153-6; discussion 156
pubmed: 17499285
Br J Urol. 1982 Aug;54(4):377-80
pubmed: 7116104
Int Urogynecol J. 2010 May;21(5):523-8
pubmed: 20013110
J Clin Med. 2020 Jun 11;9(6):
pubmed: 32545258
Urology. 1997 Jan;49(1):35-40
pubmed: 9000182
Biomed Res Int. 2019 Apr 4;2019:9051963
pubmed: 31080834