The contribution of changes to tax and social security to stalled life expectancy trends in Scotland: a modelling study.

Health inequalities Poverty Public health policy Social epidemiology Socio-economic

Journal

Journal of epidemiology and community health
ISSN: 1470-2738
Titre abrégé: J Epidemiol Community Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7909766

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
20 Oct 2020
Historique:
received: 05 06 2020
revised: 19 09 2020
accepted: 13 10 2020
entrez: 21 10 2020
pubmed: 22 10 2020
medline: 22 10 2020
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Life expectancy (LE) improvements have stalled, and UK tax and welfare 'reforms' have been proposed as a cause. We estimated the effects of tax and welfare reforms from 2010/2011 to 2021/2022 on LE and inequalities in LE in Scotland. We applied a published estimate of the cumulative income impact of the reforms to the households within Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD) quintiles. We estimated the impact on LE by applying a rate ratio for the impact of income on mortality rates (by age group, sex and SIMD quintile) and calculating the difference between inflation-only changes in benefits and the reforms. We estimated that changes to household income resulting from the reforms would result in an additional 1041 (+3.7%) female deaths and 1013 (+3.8%) male deaths. These deaths represent an estimated reduction of female LE from 81.6 years to 81.2 years (-20 weeks), and male LE from 77.6 years to 77.2 years (-23 weeks). Cuts to benefits and tax credits were modelled to have the most detrimental impact on LE, and these were estimated to be most severe in the most deprived areas. The modelled impact on inequalities in LE was widening of the gap between the most and least deprived 20% of areas by a further 21 weeks for females and 23 weeks for males. This study provides further evidence that austerity, in the form of cuts to social security benefits, is likely to be an important cause of stalled LE across the UK.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Life expectancy (LE) improvements have stalled, and UK tax and welfare 'reforms' have been proposed as a cause. We estimated the effects of tax and welfare reforms from 2010/2011 to 2021/2022 on LE and inequalities in LE in Scotland.
METHODS METHODS
We applied a published estimate of the cumulative income impact of the reforms to the households within Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD) quintiles. We estimated the impact on LE by applying a rate ratio for the impact of income on mortality rates (by age group, sex and SIMD quintile) and calculating the difference between inflation-only changes in benefits and the reforms.
RESULTS RESULTS
We estimated that changes to household income resulting from the reforms would result in an additional 1041 (+3.7%) female deaths and 1013 (+3.8%) male deaths. These deaths represent an estimated reduction of female LE from 81.6 years to 81.2 years (-20 weeks), and male LE from 77.6 years to 77.2 years (-23 weeks). Cuts to benefits and tax credits were modelled to have the most detrimental impact on LE, and these were estimated to be most severe in the most deprived areas. The modelled impact on inequalities in LE was widening of the gap between the most and least deprived 20% of areas by a further 21 weeks for females and 23 weeks for males.
INTERPRETATION CONCLUSIONS
This study provides further evidence that austerity, in the form of cuts to social security benefits, is likely to be an important cause of stalled LE across the UK.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33082131
pii: jech-2020-214770
doi: 10.1136/jech-2020-214770
pmc: PMC7958084
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Références

Soc Sci Med. 2001 May;52(9):1371-90
pubmed: 11286362
Lancet Public Health. 2019 Oct;4(10):e487-e488
pubmed: 31578981
Popul Stud (Camb). 2014 Mar;68(1):81-94
pubmed: 24134548
BMJ Open. 2018 Aug 30;8(8):e022924
pubmed: 30166307
Am J Public Health. 2019 May;109(5):768-770
pubmed: 30897000
Lancet Public Health. 2018 Jul;3(7):e333-e340
pubmed: 29976327
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020 Nov 3;:
pubmed: 33144334
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020 Sep;74(9):741-746
pubmed: 32385127
Econ Hum Biol. 2019 May;33:211-223
pubmed: 31003198
BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 23;10(1):e034832
pubmed: 31980513
Sociol Health Illn. 2018 May;40(4):750-768
pubmed: 29500841
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 31;9(10):e029936
pubmed: 31676648
Lancet Public Health. 2020 Mar;5(3):e150-e156
pubmed: 32113518
Lancet Public Health. 2019 Nov;4(11):e575-e582
pubmed: 31677776
BMJ. 2020 Feb 24;368:m693
pubmed: 32094110
Lancet Public Health. 2020 Mar;5(3):e157-e164
pubmed: 32113519

Auteurs

Elizabeth Richardson (E)

Place and Wellbeing Directorate, Public Health Scotland, Glasgow, UK.

Martin Taulbut (M)

Place and Wellbeing Directorate, Public Health Scotland, Glasgow, UK.

Mark Robinson (M)

The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Australia.

Andrew Pulford (A)

Place and Wellbeing Directorate, Public Health Scotland, Glasgow, UK.

Gerry McCartney (G)

Place and Wellbeing Directorate, Public Health Scotland, Glasgow, UK gmccartney@nhs.net.

Classifications MeSH