The role of Weber's law in human time perception.
Human time perception
Scalar property
Weber’s law
Journal
Attention, perception & psychophysics
ISSN: 1943-393X
Titre abrégé: Atten Percept Psychophys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101495384
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2021
Jan 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
22
10
2020
medline:
13
2
2021
entrez:
21
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Weber's law predicts that stimulus sensitivity will increase proportionally with increases in stimulus intensity. Does this hold for the stimulus of time - specifically, duration in the milliseconds to seconds range? There is conflicting evidence on the relationship between temporal sensitivity and duration. Weber's law predicts a linear relationship between sensitivity and duration on interval timing tasks, while two alternative models predict a reverse J-shaped and a U-shaped relationship. Based on previous research, we hypothesised that temporal sensitivity in humans would follow a U-shaped function, increasing and then decreasing with increases in duration, and that this model would provide a better statistical fit to the data than the reverse-J or the simple Weber's Law model. In a two-alternative forced-choice interval comparison task, 24 participants made duration judgements about six groups of auditory intervals between 100 and 3,200 ms. Weber fractions were generated for each group of intervals and plotted against time to generate a function describing sensitivity to the stimulus of duration. Although the sensitivity function was slightly concave, and the model describing a U-shaped function gave the best fit to the data, the increase in the model fit was not sufficient to warrant the extra free parameter in the chosen model. Further analysis demonstrated that Weber's law itself provided a better description of sensitivity to changes in duration than either of the two models tested.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33083992
doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02128-6
pii: 10.3758/s13414-020-02128-6
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
435-447Références
Bizo, L. A., Chu, J. Y. M., Sanabria, F., & Killeen, P. R. (2006). The failure of Weber’s law in time perception and production. Behavioural Processes, 71(2–3), 201–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2005.11.006
doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2005.11.006
pubmed: 16386378
Brown, A. M. (2001). A step-by-step guide to non-linear regression analysis of experimental data using a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 65(3), 191–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2607(00)00124-3
doi: 10.1016/S0169-2607(00)00124-3
pubmed: 11339981
Buonomano, D. V. (2007). The biology of time across different scales. Nature Chemical Biology, 3(10), 594–597. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio1007-594
doi: 10.1038/nchembio1007-594
pubmed: 17876310
Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (1998). Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach (2nd). Springer-Verlag. https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9780387953649
Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2004). Multimodel Inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in Model Selection. Sociological Methods & Research, 33(2), 261–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124104268644
doi: 10.1177/0049124104268644
Burnham, K. P., Anderson, D. R., & Huyvaert, K. P. (2011). AIC model selection and multimodel inference in behavioral ecology: Some background, observations, and comparisons. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 65(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-010-1029-6
doi: 10.1007/s00265-010-1029-6
Cantor, M. B., & Wilson, J. F. (1981). Temporal uncertainty as an associative metric: Operant simulations of Pavlovian conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110(2), 232–268. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.110.2.232
doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.110.2.232
Church, R. M., Getty, D. J., & Lerner, N. D. (1976). Duration discrimination by rats. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 2(4), 303–312. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.2.4.303
doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.2.4.303
pubmed: 988110
Cliff, J., Jackson, S., McEwan, J., & Bizo, L. (2019). Weber’s Law and the Scalar Property of Timing: A Test of Canine Timing. Animals, 9(10), 801. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9100801
doi: 10.3390/ani9100801
Corke, M., Bell, J., Goodhew, S. C., Smithson, M., & Edwards, M. (2018). Perceived time slows during fleeting fun or fear. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(2), 562–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2016.1264000
doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1264000
El Haj, M., & Kapogiannis, D. (2016). Time distortions in Alzheimer’s disease: A systematic review and theoretical integration. Npj Aging and Mechanisms of Disease, 2(1), 16016. https://doi.org/10.1038/npjamd.2016.16
doi: 10.1038/npjamd.2016.16
pubmed: 28721270
pmcid: 5514999
Fetterman, J. G., & Killeen, P. R. (1990). A componential analysis of pacemaker-counter timing systems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(4), 766–780. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.16.4.766
doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.16.4.766
pubmed: 2148591
Fetterman, J. G., & Killeen, P. R. (1992). Time discrimination in Columba livia and Homo sapiens. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 18(1), 80–94. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.18.1.80
doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.18.1.80
pubmed: 1578202
Getty, D. J. (1975). Discrimination of short temporal intervals: A comparison of two models. Perception & Psychophysics, 18(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199358
doi: 10.3758/BF03199358
Gibbon, J. (1977). Scalar expectancy theory and Weber's law in animal timing. Psychological Review, 84(3), 279–325.
Gibbon, J., & Church, R. M. (1984). Sources of variance in an information processing theory of timing. In H. Roitblat, H. Terrace, & W. Sever (Eds.), Animal cognition (pp. 465–488). Erlbaum.
Gibbon, J., Malapani, C., Dale, C. L., & Gallistel, C. R. (1997). Toward a neurobiology of temporal cognition: Advances and challenges. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 7(2), 170–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4388(97)80005-0
doi: 10.1016/S0959-4388(97)80005-0
pubmed: 9142762
Grondin, S. (2001). From physical time to the first and second moments of psychological time. Psychological Bulletin, 127(1), 22–44. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.22
doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.22
pubmed: 11271754
Grondin, S. (2010a). Timing and time perception: A review of recent behavioral and neuroscience findings and theoretical directions. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(3), 561–582. https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.3.561
doi: 10.3758/APP.72.3.561
Grondin, S. (2010b). Unequal Weber fractions for the categorization of brief temporal intervals. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 72(5), 1422–1430. https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.5.1422
doi: 10.3758/APP.72.5.1422
Grondin, S. (2012). Violation of the scalar property for time perception between 1 and 2 seconds: Evidence from interval discrimination, reproduction, and categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(4), 880–890. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027188
doi: 10.1037/a0027188
pubmed: 22390291
Grondin, S. (2014). About the (Non)scalar Property for Time Perception. In H. Merchant & V. de Lafuente (Eds.), Neurobiology of Interval Timing (Vol. 829, pp. 17–32). Springer New York. 10.1007/978-1-4939-1782-2_2
Haß, J., Blaschke, S., Rammsayer, T., & Herrmann, J. M. (2008). A neurocomputational model for optimal temporal processing. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 25(3), 449–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10827-008-0088-4
doi: 10.1007/s10827-008-0088-4
pubmed: 18379866
Hinton, S. C., & Rao, S. M. (2004). “One-thousand one … one-thousand two …”: Chronometric counting violates the scalar property in interval timing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(1), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206456
doi: 10.3758/BF03206456
Holway, A. H., & Pratt, C. C. (1936). The Weber ratio for intensive discrimination. Psychological Review, 43(4), 322–340. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0059748
doi: 10.1037/h0059748
Jamieson, D. G., & Petrusic, W. M. (1975). The dependence of time-order error direction on stimulus range. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie, 29(3), 175–182.
Killeen, P. R., & Weiss, N. A. (1987). Optimal timing and the Weber function. Psychological Review, 94(4), 455–468. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.94.4.455
doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.94.4.455
pubmed: 3317471
Kingdom, F., & Prins, N. (2016). Psychophysics: A Practical Introduction (2nd). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407156-8.12001-8
Lavoie, P., & Grondin, S. (2004). Information processing limitations as revealed by temporal discrimination. Brain and Cognition, 54(3), 198–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2004.02.039
doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.02.039
pubmed: 15050774
Lejeune, H., & Wearden, J. H. (1991). The comparative psychology of fixed-interval responding: Some quantitative analyses. Learning and Motivation, 22(1–2), 84–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/0023-9690(91)90018-4
doi: 10.1016/0023-9690(91)90018-4
Lejeune, H., & Wearden, J. H. (2006). Scalar Properties in Animal Timing: Conformity and Violations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(11), 1875–1908. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210600784649
doi: 10.1080/17470210600784649
Malapani, C., Rakitin, B., Levy, R., Meck, W. H., Deweer, B., Dubois, B., & Gibbon, J. (1998). Coupled Temporal Memories in Parkinson’s Disease: A Dopamine-Related Dysfunction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10(3), 316–331. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892998562762
doi: 10.1162/089892998562762
pubmed: 9869707
Masin, S. (2009). The (Weber’s) law that never was. In M. Elliott & S. Antonijevic (Eds.), Fechner Day 2009: Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Psychophysics (pp. 441–446). International Society for Psychophysics.
Matell, M. S., & Meck, W. H. (2000). Neuropsychological mechanisms of interval timing behavior. BioEssays: News and Reviews in Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, 22(1), 94–103. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-1878(200001)22:1<94::AID-BIES14>3.0.CO;2-E
Millisecond. (2018). Inquisit (5.0) [Computer software]. Millisecond Software. https://www.millisecond.com
Navakatikyan, M. A. (2007). A model for residence time in concurrent variable interval performance. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 87(1), 121–141.
Sowden, P. T. (2012). Psychophysics. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 1: Foundations, planning, measures, and psychometrics. (pp. 445–458). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13619-024
Spiess, A.-N., & Neumeyer, N. (2010). An evaluation of R2 as an inadequate measure for nonlinear models in pharmacological and biochemical research: A Monte Carlo approach. BMC Pharmacology, 10(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2210-10-6
doi: 10.1186/1471-2210-10-6
pubmed: 20529254
pmcid: 2892436
Steinberg. (2015). Cubase (8.5) [Computer software]. Steinberg Media Technologies.
Ueda, N., Maruo, K., & Sumiyoshi, T. (2018). Positive symptoms and time perception in schizophrenia: A meta-analysis. Schizophrenia Research. Cognition, 13, 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scog.2018.07.002
doi: 10.1016/j.scog.2018.07.002
pubmed: 30105211
pmcid: 6083898
Wearden, J. H., & Lejeune, H. (2008). Scalar Properties in Human Timing: Conformity and Violations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(4), 569–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210701282576
doi: 10.1080/17470210701282576
Woodrow, H. (1930). The reproduction of temporal intervals. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 13(6), 473–499. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0070462
doi: 10.1037/h0070462