The Worst-Motive Fallacy: A Negativity Bias in Motive Attribution.

attribution cognitive bias experimental philosophy meta-ethics moral intuitions moral judgment motives open data open materials preregistered

Journal

Psychological science
ISSN: 1467-9280
Titre abrégé: Psychol Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9007542

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 22 10 2020
medline: 19 8 2021
entrez: 21 10 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In this article, we describe a hitherto undocumented fallacy-in the sense of a mistake in reasoning-constituted by a negativity bias in the way that people attribute motives to others. We call this the "worst-motive fallacy," and we conducted two experiments to investigate it. In Experiment 1 (

Identifiants

pubmed: 33085928
doi: 10.1177/0956797620954492
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1430-1438

Auteurs

Joel Walmsley (J)

Department of Philosophy, University College Cork.

Cathal O'Madagain (C)

Département d'Études Cognitives, École Normale Supérieure.
School of Collective Intelligence, Université Mohammed VI Polytechnique.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH