Electrical Stun Gun and Modern Implantable Cardiac Stimulators: Update for a New Stun Gun Model.
Journal
Health physics
ISSN: 1538-5159
Titre abrégé: Health Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 2985093R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 03 2021
01 03 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
22
10
2020
medline:
29
12
2021
entrez:
21
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In 2017, the Italian National Institute of Health conducted a study to evaluate the potential risks of Conducted Electrical Weapons (CEW, AKA "stun guns") for users bearing a pacemaker (PM) or an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). The study addressed two specific models of stun guns: the TASER model X2 and AXON model X26P. In 2019, the same experimental protocol and testing procedure was adopted to evaluate the risk for another model of stun gun, the MAGEN model 5 (MAGEN, Israel). The MAGEN 5 differs from the previous stun guns tested in terms of peak voltage generated, duration of the shock, and trigger modality for repeated shocks. This note is an update of the previous study results, including the measurements on the MAGEN 5 stun gun. Despite the differences between the stun gun models, the effects on the PM/ICD behavior were the same as previously observed for the TASER stun guns.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33086265
pii: 00004032-202103000-00012
doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000001332
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
344-349Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Health Physics Society.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Références
Mattei E, Censi F, Calcagnini G. Electrical stun gun and modern implantable cardiac stimulators. Health Phys 116:18–26; 2019. DOI:10.1097/HP.0000000000000942.
doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000000942