Assessment of burnout in medical students using the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Student Survey: a cross-sectional data analysis.
Burnout
MBI-SS
Maslach
Medicine
Motivation
Students
Wellness
Journal
BMC medical education
ISSN: 1472-6920
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Educ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088679
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 Oct 2020
21 Oct 2020
Historique:
received:
27
02
2020
accepted:
01
10
2020
entrez:
22
10
2020
pubmed:
23
10
2020
medline:
15
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Medical student burnout can cause emotional and physical exhaustion and detachment. The objectives of this study were to evaluate burnout using the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Student Survey (MBI-SS), identify factors that may predict burnout, and assess wellness initiatives effectiveness at reducing burnout. The MBI-SS was administered to all medical students (Classes 2019 to 2022) at the University of Illinois College of Medicine (UICOM) from February to May 2019. Factor analysis and internal consistency of the MBI-SS were assessed. Mean MSBI-SS subscale scores for burnout were calculated for cynicism (CY), emotional exhaustion (EE), and academic efficacy (AE). Multiple regression analysis was used to identify student factors that may predict burnout. A total of 273 (21.6%) UICOM students completed the survey and 110 (40.3%) respondents reported self-perceived burnout. MBI-SS subscale scores were significantly higher for CY and EE, and significantly lower for AE in students who reported suffering from burnout versus students who did not report burnout. Mean ± SD subscale scores for CY, EE, and AE in burnout students were 14.44 ± 5.59, 23.23 ± 4.74, and 24.81 ± 5.35, respectively. In comparison, mean ± SD subscale scores for CY, EE, and AE in non-burnout students were 7.59 ± 5.16, 14.96 ± 5.71, and 28.74 ± 3.21, respectively. Regression analysis denoted significant associations between burnout and being out-of-phase in the curriculum, the effectiveness of wellness initiatives, and strength of motivation for medical school (SMMS) in both the two- and three-dimensional MBI-SS models. Gender was significantly associated with burnout in only the two-dimensional model. Self-reported burnout in medical students at UICOM was validated using the MBI-SS. Being out-of-phase in the curriculum, being female, rating wellness initiatives as less effective, and demonstrating lower motivation for continued medical school education may be used as predictors of medical student burnout. This investigation may act as a guide for measuring burnout in medical student populations and how the implementation of wellness initiatives may ameliorate burnout.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Medical student burnout can cause emotional and physical exhaustion and detachment. The objectives of this study were to evaluate burnout using the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Student Survey (MBI-SS), identify factors that may predict burnout, and assess wellness initiatives effectiveness at reducing burnout.
METHODS
METHODS
The MBI-SS was administered to all medical students (Classes 2019 to 2022) at the University of Illinois College of Medicine (UICOM) from February to May 2019. Factor analysis and internal consistency of the MBI-SS were assessed. Mean MSBI-SS subscale scores for burnout were calculated for cynicism (CY), emotional exhaustion (EE), and academic efficacy (AE). Multiple regression analysis was used to identify student factors that may predict burnout.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 273 (21.6%) UICOM students completed the survey and 110 (40.3%) respondents reported self-perceived burnout. MBI-SS subscale scores were significantly higher for CY and EE, and significantly lower for AE in students who reported suffering from burnout versus students who did not report burnout. Mean ± SD subscale scores for CY, EE, and AE in burnout students were 14.44 ± 5.59, 23.23 ± 4.74, and 24.81 ± 5.35, respectively. In comparison, mean ± SD subscale scores for CY, EE, and AE in non-burnout students were 7.59 ± 5.16, 14.96 ± 5.71, and 28.74 ± 3.21, respectively. Regression analysis denoted significant associations between burnout and being out-of-phase in the curriculum, the effectiveness of wellness initiatives, and strength of motivation for medical school (SMMS) in both the two- and three-dimensional MBI-SS models. Gender was significantly associated with burnout in only the two-dimensional model.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Self-reported burnout in medical students at UICOM was validated using the MBI-SS. Being out-of-phase in the curriculum, being female, rating wellness initiatives as less effective, and demonstrating lower motivation for continued medical school education may be used as predictors of medical student burnout. This investigation may act as a guide for measuring burnout in medical student populations and how the implementation of wellness initiatives may ameliorate burnout.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33087080
doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02274-3
pii: 10.1186/s12909-020-02274-3
pmc: PMC7579892
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
376Références
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 12;9:2105
pubmed: 30483171
Acad Med. 2015 Jul;90(7):961-9
pubmed: 25650824
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 7;13(3):e0191746
pubmed: 29513668
Acad Med. 2006 Apr;81(4):374-84
pubmed: 16565189
Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Jul;46(7):894-902
pubmed: 19362309
Fam Med. 2017 Jun;49(6):456-459
pubmed: 28633172
Teach Learn Med. 2019 Apr-May;31(2):154-169
pubmed: 30577705
Crit Care Med. 2018 Jan;46(1):116-122
pubmed: 29016364
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 7;9(3):e022097
pubmed: 30850399
Med Educ Online. 2014 Aug 25;19:25209
pubmed: 25160716
Acad Med. 2016 Sep;91(9):1251-6
pubmed: 26934693
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Oct 10;17(1):184
pubmed: 29017594
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Nov 20;16(1):220
pubmed: 30458785
South Med J. 2010 Aug;103(8):758-63
pubmed: 20622724
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Nov 16;17(1):217
pubmed: 29145854
Med Educ Online. 2017;22(1):1358579
pubmed: 28762297
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Jun 4;170(11):784-790
pubmed: 31132791
Stress Health. 2014 Feb;30(1):82-8
pubmed: 23349135
Fam Med. 2019 May;51(5):399-404
pubmed: 31081911
JAMA. 2016 Dec 6;316(21):2214-2236
pubmed: 27923088
Lancet. 2016 Nov 5;388(10057):2272-2281
pubmed: 27692469
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2011 Apr;84(4):453-9
pubmed: 21373879
Med Educ. 2013 Feb;47(2):173-81
pubmed: 23323656
Med Teach. 2019 Feb;41(2):172-183
pubmed: 29656675
Clin Teach. 2013 Aug;10(4):242-5
pubmed: 23834570
J Gen Intern Med. 2000 Jun;15(6):372-80
pubmed: 10886471
Cureus. 2018 Dec 4;10(12):e3681
pubmed: 30761233
Acad Med. 2014 May;89(5):749-54
pubmed: 24667503
Eur Psychiatry. 2019 Jan;55:36-42
pubmed: 30384110
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Mar 1;32(7):678-86
pubmed: 24470006
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016 Nov;37(11):1272-1277
pubmed: 27514583
Rand Health Q. 2014 Dec 1;3(4):1
pubmed: 28083306
Med Educ Online. 2004 Dec;9(1):4355
pubmed: 28253126
Am J Pharm Educ. 2008 Apr 15;72(2):43
pubmed: 18483608