Forest production efficiency increases with growth temperature.
Journal
Nature communications
ISSN: 2041-1723
Titre abrégé: Nat Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101528555
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 10 2020
21 10 2020
Historique:
received:
04
04
2020
accepted:
18
09
2020
entrez:
22
10
2020
pubmed:
23
10
2020
medline:
23
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Forest production efficiency (FPE) metric describes how efficiently the assimilated carbon is partitioned into plants organs (biomass production, BP) or-more generally-for the production of organic matter (net primary production, NPP). We present a global analysis of the relationship of FPE to stand-age and climate, based on a large compilation of data on gross primary production and either BP or NPP. FPE is important for both forest production and atmospheric carbon dioxide uptake. We find that FPE increases with absolute latitude, precipitation and (all else equal) with temperature. Earlier findings-FPE declining with age-are also supported by this analysis. However, the temperature effect is opposite to what would be expected based on the short-term physiological response of respiration rates to temperature, implying a top-down regulation of carbon loss, perhaps reflecting the higher carbon costs of nutrient acquisition in colder climates. Current ecosystem models do not reproduce this phenomenon. They consistently predict lower FPE in warmer climates, and are therefore likely to overestimate carbon losses in a warming climate.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33087724
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19187-w
pii: 10.1038/s41467-020-19187-w
pmc: PMC7578801
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
5322Références
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 02;10(12):e0144124
pubmed: 26629819
Ecol Appl. 2010 Apr;20(3):663-83
pubmed: 20437955
New Phytol. 2019 Apr;222(2):670-686
pubmed: 30394553
Chemosphere. 2002 Dec;49(8):837-44
pubmed: 12430661
Tree Physiol. 2018 May 1;38(5):690-695
pubmed: 29304257
Glob Chang Biol. 2013 Jan;19(1):45-63
pubmed: 23504720
Funct Plant Biol. 2003 Feb;30(2):171-186
pubmed: 32689003
Tree Physiol. 2017 Mar 1;37(3):281-284
pubmed: 28338713
Ann Bot. 2011 Nov;108(7):1365-80
pubmed: 21948663
Glob Chang Biol. 2020 Feb 24;:
pubmed: 32091184
Ecology. 2010 Mar;91(3):652-61
pubmed: 20426325
Nat Commun. 2016 Dec 14;7:13717
pubmed: 27966534
Tree Physiol. 2008 Apr;28(4):499-508
pubmed: 18244937
Ecol Lett. 2016 Dec;19(12):1419-1428
pubmed: 27758027
Tree Physiol. 2020 May 30;40(6):695-699
pubmed: 32083672
New Phytol. 2010 Aug;187(3):608-21
pubmed: 20553394
Plant Cell Environ. 2009 Jan;32(1):22-30
pubmed: 19021883
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2014;65:667-87
pubmed: 24274032
Glob Chang Biol. 2020 Mar;26(3):1474-1484
pubmed: 31560157
Plant Cell Environ. 2006 Mar;29(3):367-81
pubmed: 17080592
New Phytol. 2005 Aug;167(2):437-55
pubmed: 15998397
Nature. 2014 Aug 7;512(7512):39-43
pubmed: 25043056
New Phytol. 2016 Aug;211(3):850-63
pubmed: 27122489
Tree Physiol. 1998 Feb;18(2):129-134
pubmed: 12651397
Glob Chang Biol. 2017 Jan;23(1):209-223
pubmed: 27562605
Glob Chang Biol. 2020 Mar;26(3):1739-1753
pubmed: 31578796
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jun 17;111(24):8856-60
pubmed: 24889643
Trends Plant Sci. 2016 Mar;21(3):256-265
pubmed: 26832948
Tree Physiol. 2019 Aug 1;39(8):1473-1483
pubmed: 30924876
Ecol Appl. 2019 Mar;29(2):e01837
pubmed: 30549378
Tree Physiol. 2019 Dec 1;39(12):1937-1960
pubmed: 31748793
J Adv Model Earth Syst. 2018 Oct;10(10):2427-2452
pubmed: 31007835
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jan 26;107(4):1447-51
pubmed: 20080600
Ecology. 2006 Jan;87(1):64-75
pubmed: 16634297
Nature. 2016 Mar 31;531(7596):633-6
pubmed: 26982730
Ecol Lett. 2008 Aug;11(8):793-801
pubmed: 18445031
Ecol Lett. 2012 Jun;15(6):520-6
pubmed: 22472207