Operative Treatment of Proximal Humeral Fracture-dislocations Through an Anterolateral Deltoid Split Approach.
Fracture fixation
Internal
Minimally invasive surgical procedures
Operative
Shoulder dislocation
Shoulder fractures
Surgical procedures
Journal
The archives of bone and joint surgery
ISSN: 2345-4644
Titre abrégé: Arch Bone Jt Surg
Pays: Iran
ID NLM: 101636743
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2020
Sep 2020
Historique:
entrez:
22
10
2020
pubmed:
23
10
2020
medline:
23
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Proximal humeral fracture-dislocations (PHFD) are a special entity in proximal humeral fracture treatment. The aim of this study is to present our minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) technique through an anterolateral deltoid split approach. In addition, we performed a retrospective cohort study analyzing the patient reported functional outcome and complications. A single center cohort study was performed. All patients operated through a deltoid split approach for PHFD between 2009 and 2016 were eligible for inclusion. The primary endpoint was subjective shoulder function measured with QuickDASH and subjective shoulder value (SSV). Secondary endpoints were complications and implant-related irritation. 28 patients were included. The mean age was 49 (SD ± 10.3). The mean follow-up was 48 months (SD ± 23.7). The mean QuickDASH score was 6.8 (SD ±7.8) and the mean SSV was 86 (SD ±14.6). Four patients had a conversion into a reversed arthroplasty (14%), one patient (4%) a shortening of secondary perforated screws, four patients an early re-osteosynthesis (14%), four patients (14%) developed an AVN and in one patient damage of the axillary nerve was observed. 21 patients (75%) had their implant removed. Patient reported functional results after humeral head preservation and internal fixation of PHFDs through an anterolateral deltoid spilt approach are promising. However, there is a high rate of re-operations either because of complications or for implant removal. Comparing our data to literature these rates are not depending on the approach chosen.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Proximal humeral fracture-dislocations (PHFD) are a special entity in proximal humeral fracture treatment. The aim of this study is to present our minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) technique through an anterolateral deltoid split approach. In addition, we performed a retrospective cohort study analyzing the patient reported functional outcome and complications.
METHODS
METHODS
A single center cohort study was performed. All patients operated through a deltoid split approach for PHFD between 2009 and 2016 were eligible for inclusion. The primary endpoint was subjective shoulder function measured with QuickDASH and subjective shoulder value (SSV). Secondary endpoints were complications and implant-related irritation.
RESULTS
RESULTS
28 patients were included. The mean age was 49 (SD ± 10.3). The mean follow-up was 48 months (SD ± 23.7). The mean QuickDASH score was 6.8 (SD ±7.8) and the mean SSV was 86 (SD ±14.6). Four patients had a conversion into a reversed arthroplasty (14%), one patient (4%) a shortening of secondary perforated screws, four patients an early re-osteosynthesis (14%), four patients (14%) developed an AVN and in one patient damage of the axillary nerve was observed. 21 patients (75%) had their implant removed.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Patient reported functional results after humeral head preservation and internal fixation of PHFDs through an anterolateral deltoid spilt approach are promising. However, there is a high rate of re-operations either because of complications or for implant removal. Comparing our data to literature these rates are not depending on the approach chosen.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33088860
doi: 10.22038/abjs.2020.42728.2162
pmc: PMC7547160
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
589-597Informations de copyright
2020 © BY THE ARCHIVES OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY.
Références
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Aug;27(8):1526-1534
pubmed: 29735376
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004 Jul-Aug;13(4):427-33
pubmed: 15220884
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 May;87(5):1038-46
pubmed: 15866967
Injury. 2013 Apr;44(4):442-7
pubmed: 23026114
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2017 Apr;27(3):285-294
pubmed: 27562590
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993 Apr;(289):156-60
pubmed: 8472406
Injury. 2013 Apr;44(4):456-60
pubmed: 23043975
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11:S174-88
pubmed: 22588743
Injury. 2009 Feb;40(2):186-91
pubmed: 19100544
Acta Orthop Scand. 2001 Aug;72(4):365-71
pubmed: 11580125
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014 Feb;134(2):269-75
pubmed: 21901558
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Feb;475(2):532-539
pubmed: 27830484
JAMA. 2015 Mar 10;313(10):1037-47
pubmed: 25756440
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019 Feb;139(2):203-209
pubmed: 30421113
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008 Jan-Feb;17(1):2-8
pubmed: 18308202
J Orthop Trauma. 2009 Mar;23(3):163-72
pubmed: 19516088
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Oct;26(10):e293-e299
pubmed: 28522075
Open Orthop J. 2017 Sep 30;11:1108-1114
pubmed: 29152005
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000 Mar;82(3):304-14
pubmed: 10724223
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 Apr;88(4):502-8
pubmed: 16567786
Injury. 2017 Jun;48(6):1175-1182
pubmed: 28372791
Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2012 Feb;24(1):61-73
pubmed: 22270881
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2017 Dec;137(12):1677-1683
pubmed: 28914349
Int Orthop. 2016 Mar;40(3):579-85
pubmed: 26686493