Spinopelvic Parameters among Healthy Volunteers in Iran.
Spinopelvic
agittal balance
arameter
ealthy people
ormal range
Journal
The archives of bone and joint surgery
ISSN: 2345-4644
Titre abrégé: Arch Bone Jt Surg
Pays: Iran
ID NLM: 101636743
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2020
Sep 2020
Historique:
entrez:
22
10
2020
pubmed:
23
10
2020
medline:
23
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Recently, in approach to spinal pathologies, the whole spine should be considered as a biomechanical unit. Studies have shown the great importance of sagittal and coronal balance and the relationship between the various parts of spine together and pelvis. Former studies have shown a close relationship between spinopelvic parameters and sagittal balance. A complete understanding of sagittal balance basics is needed to achieve the best outcome and avoiding future complications after treatment of spinal deformities. In this study, the normal range of spinopelvic parameters among healthy volunteers in Iran has been evaluated. This cross-sectional study was conducted on healthy volunteers in 2017. The lateral whole-spine X-ray was obtained under the standard conditions. Two spine surgeons measured the parameters including pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, sacral slope and lumbar lordosis. In this study 100 volunteers were studied; out of whom, 41 participants were male and the mean age was 47.5±11.7 years. The average pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, and sacral slope were 51.5±10.9, 17.4±9.9, and 34.8±8.8 degrees, respectively. The pelvic tilt was significantly lower in women. It was found that with increasing age, the pelvic incidence and pelvic tilt increases while lumbar lordosis decreases ( This study is the first study on the normal range of spinopelvic parameters in healthy individuals in Iran.. Our data showed that PT and PI-LL are significantly lower in women, while, PT, PI and PI-LL increase and LL decreases in older ages.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Recently, in approach to spinal pathologies, the whole spine should be considered as a biomechanical unit. Studies have shown the great importance of sagittal and coronal balance and the relationship between the various parts of spine together and pelvis. Former studies have shown a close relationship between spinopelvic parameters and sagittal balance. A complete understanding of sagittal balance basics is needed to achieve the best outcome and avoiding future complications after treatment of spinal deformities. In this study, the normal range of spinopelvic parameters among healthy volunteers in Iran has been evaluated.
METHODS
METHODS
This cross-sectional study was conducted on healthy volunteers in 2017. The lateral whole-spine X-ray was obtained under the standard conditions. Two spine surgeons measured the parameters including pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, sacral slope and lumbar lordosis.
RESULTS
RESULTS
In this study 100 volunteers were studied; out of whom, 41 participants were male and the mean age was 47.5±11.7 years. The average pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, and sacral slope were 51.5±10.9, 17.4±9.9, and 34.8±8.8 degrees, respectively. The pelvic tilt was significantly lower in women. It was found that with increasing age, the pelvic incidence and pelvic tilt increases while lumbar lordosis decreases (
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
This study is the first study on the normal range of spinopelvic parameters in healthy individuals in Iran.. Our data showed that PT and PI-LL are significantly lower in women, while, PT, PI and PI-LL increase and LL decreases in older ages.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33088864
doi: 10.22038/abjs.2020.40734.2106
pmc: PMC7547167
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
620-624Informations de copyright
2020 © BY THE ARCHIVES OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY.
Références
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015 Jul;25 Suppl 1:S21-4
pubmed: 26023066
Eur Spine J. 2011 Sep;20 Suppl 5:586-90
pubmed: 21811824
Eur Spine J. 2011 Sep;20 Suppl 5:572-7
pubmed: 21833574
Eur Spine J. 2013 Nov;22 Suppl 6:S842-6
pubmed: 24072339
Clin Spine Surg. 2017 Nov;30(9):392-403
pubmed: 28368866
Global Spine J. 2016 Mar;6(2):169-75
pubmed: 26933619
Global Spine J. 2017 Sep;7(6):536-542
pubmed: 28894683
Clin Spine Surg. 2017 Mar;30(2):E119-E123
pubmed: 27764059
Eur Spine J. 2011 Sep;20 Suppl 5:602-8
pubmed: 21830081
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Sep 15;29(18):2049-54
pubmed: 15371707
Global Spine J. 2018 Feb;8(1):17-24
pubmed: 29456911
Eur Spine J. 2018 Feb;27(2):426-432
pubmed: 27771788
Eur Spine J. 2014 Oct;23 Suppl 6:616-27
pubmed: 25212448
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 May 15;19(10):1117-23; discussion 1123-4
pubmed: 8059266
Spine J. 2013 Nov;13(11):1500-9
pubmed: 24094715
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 May 1;30(9):1082-5
pubmed: 15864163
Eur Spine J. 2010 Nov;19(11):1824-36
pubmed: 20567858
Chin Med J (Engl). 2010 Nov;123(21):2978-82
pubmed: 21162941