The Fifth International Survey of Critical Care Nursing Organizations: Implications for Policy.
Critical care
education
international
nursing
professional issues
survey
workforce
Journal
Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing
ISSN: 1547-5069
Titre abrégé: J Nurs Scholarsh
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100911591
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2020
11 2020
Historique:
accepted:
23
07
2020
pubmed:
23
10
2020
medline:
29
4
2021
entrez:
22
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To examine the activities, concerns, and expectations of critical care nurses and professional critical care nursing organizations worldwide. A descriptive survey methodology was used. This study is the fifth worldwide quadrennial review of its type to monitor variations in critical care nursing needs and provide robust evidence to inform policy related to critical care nursing practice. The fifth World Federation of Critical Care Nurses international survey of critical care nursing organizations was emailed to potential participants from countries with critical care nursing organizations or known critical care nurse leaders. Data were collected online. Responses were entered into SPSS version 23 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and analyzed by geographical region and national wealth group. Eighty-two national representative respondents participated in the survey, of whom two thirds (n = 56, 68%) had an established critical care nursing organization in their country. The five most important issues identified were working conditions, teamwork, staffing levels, the need for formal practice guidelines and competencies, and wages. The top five critical care nursing organization services that were considered to be of most importance were professional representation, as well as provision of workshops and education forums, national conferences, practice standards and guidelines, and local conferences. The most important contributions expected from the World Federation of Critical Care Nurses were standards for clinical practice and professional practice, international conferences, professional representation, and study and education grants. The results highlight priority areas for critical care nursing and reinforce the need to address factors that can inform critical care nursing policy and practice. Results of this survey should be incorporated into strategic action plans at the national and international levels. Nursing leaders, policymakers, and other interested stakeholders should consider these findings when planning critical care workforce requirements. Interested parties should work collaboratively to inform recommendations for further policy and action.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33089651
doi: 10.1111/jnu.12599
pmc: PMC7756856
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
652-660Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. Journal of Nursing Scholarship published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Sigma Theta Tau International.
Références
J Adv Nurs. 2011 Mar;67(3):550-62
pubmed: 21091912
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2017 Dec;12(1):1267346
pubmed: 28452605
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 22;10(10):e0140141
pubmed: 26492196
Nurs Crit Care. 2011 Jan-Feb;16(1):5-10
pubmed: 21199549
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2013 Oct;10(5):509-13
pubmed: 24161054
Aust Crit Care. 2012 Nov;25(4):224-37
pubmed: 22306291
Crit Care. 2018 Oct 29;22(1):284
pubmed: 30373648
J Intensive Care Soc. 2017 May;18(2):149-156
pubmed: 28979563
Crit Care Clin. 2006 Jul;22(3):393-406, vii
pubmed: 16893727
Int Nurs Rev. 2015 Dec;62(4):453-61
pubmed: 26303926
Int Nurs Rev. 2001 Dec;48(4):208-17
pubmed: 11775754
PLoS One. 2015 Jan 24;10(1):e0116949
pubmed: 25617837