Direct repair of chronic pectoralis major tears in active duty military patients.
Chronic pectoralis major tear
Direct repair
Military patients
Pectoralis major tear
Journal
Journal of orthopaedics
ISSN: 0972-978X
Titre abrégé: J Orthop
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101233220
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
received:
08
06
2020
revised:
18
08
2020
accepted:
04
10
2020
entrez:
23
10
2020
pubmed:
24
10
2020
medline:
24
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To express the significance and report the clinical outcomes of active duty military patients who underwent direct pectoralis major repairs in a chronic setting. Retrospective review of data collected on 16 active duty military patients who underwent direct repair of a chronic pectoralis major tear. Pre-operative and post-operative evaluations (minimum 2 year follow up; mean, 53.46 months; range, 24-88 months) included range of motion, Bak classification, visual analog scale (VAS), Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) Score, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Score, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Shoulder Score. Using a Bak classification, 94% (15/16) of patients were reported with good or excellent results. Mean VAS score improved from 7.08 ± 1.66 to 0.54 ± 1.20 (p < 0.0001). Mean SANE score improved from 42.31 ± 19.96 to 94.62 ± 5.94 (p < 0.0001). The average Quick DASH score increased from 55.42 ± 15.34 to 7.30 ± 6.39 (p < 0.0001). The average ASES score increased from 48.71 ± 13.80 to 94.62 ± 7.63 (p < 0.0001). There was no loss of motion after surgery in forward flexion, external rotation or internal rotation. The average internal rotation muscle power increased from 4.15 ± 0.48 to 4.92 ± 0.28 (p < 0.0001). 6.25% (1/16) patients developed a keloid scar, tender to direct pressure post-operatively. 94% (15/16) of patients returned to their pre-operative level of recreational and military job activity. Military patients who underwent direct repair of a chronic pectoralis major tear had excellent clinical outcomes, low risk of complications, and a high return to pre-operative level of recreational and military job activity. Case Series; IV.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33093755
doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.10.002
pii: S0972-978X(20)30318-4
pmc: PMC7560649
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
458-462Informations de copyright
© 2020 Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Références
Am J Sports Med. 2004 Jul-Aug;32(5):1256-62
pubmed: 15262651
Iowa Orthop J. 2015;35:8-12
pubmed: 26361438
Am J Sports Med. 1992 Sep-Oct;20(5):587-93
pubmed: 1443329
Br J Sports Med. 2001 Jun;35(3):202-6
pubmed: 11375884
Am J Sports Med. 2000 Jan-Feb;28(1):9-15
pubmed: 10653537
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994 Jul;75(7):819-21
pubmed: 8024433
Orthopedics. 2010 Jan;33(1):23
pubmed: 20055351
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1975;(109):120-1
pubmed: 1132193
World J Orthop. 2016 Oct 18;7(10):670-677
pubmed: 27795949
Am J Sports Med. 2000 Mar-Apr;28(2):254-6
pubmed: 10751005
Open Access J Sports Med. 2010 Oct 11;1:201-5
pubmed: 24198558
Acta Orthop Belg. 2017 Sep;83(3):433-437
pubmed: 30423645
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Jul;47(9):2151-2157
pubmed: 31303006
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Mar;21(3):412-22
pubmed: 21831661
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Jan 4;99(1):25-32
pubmed: 28060230