A qualitative analysis and development of a conceptual model assessing financial toxicity in cancer patients accessing the universal healthcare system.
Cancer
Conceptual model
Financial toxicity
Patient experience
Qualitative research
Journal
Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer
ISSN: 1433-7339
Titre abrégé: Support Care Cancer
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9302957
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Jun 2021
Historique:
received:
20
06
2020
accepted:
16
10
2020
pubmed:
24
10
2020
medline:
18
5
2021
entrez:
23
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This paper illustrates a conceptual model for a new patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) aimed at measuring financial toxicity (FT) in oncological setting in Italy, where citizens are provided universal healthcare coverage. Focus groups with overall 34 patients/caregivers in three different Italian centers (from Northern, Centre, and Southern Italy) and an open-ended survey with 97 medical oncologists were undertaken. Transcripts from focus groups and the open-ended survey were analyzed to identify themes and links between themes. Themes from the qualitative research were supplemented with those reported in the literature; concepts identified formed the basis for item development that were then tested through the importance analysis (with 45 patients) and the cognitive debriefing (with other 45 patients) to test relevance and comprehension of the first draft PRO instrument. Ten domains were extracted by analyzing 156 concepts generated from focus groups and the open-ended survey. After controlling for redundancy, 55 items were generated and tested through the importance analysis. After controlling comprehension and feasibility through cognitive debriefing interviews, a first version of the questionnaire consisting of 30 items was devised. This qualitative study represents the first part of a study conducted to develop a new PROM to assess FT in Italy, by using a bottom-up approach that makes the most of patients' experiences and the health system analysis. clinicaltrials.gov NCT03473379 first posted on March 22, 2018.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33094357
doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05840-z
pii: 10.1007/s00520-020-05840-z
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03473379']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3219-3233Subventions
Organisme : Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro
ID : IG 20402
Références
Altice CK, Banegas MP, Tucker-Seeley RD, Yabroff KR (2017) Financial hardships experienced by cancer survivors: a systematic review. JNCI: J Natl Cancer Inst 109(2):djw205
Braveman P, Egerter S, Williams DR (2011) The social determinants of health: coming of age. Annu Rev Public Health 32:381–398
doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031210-101218
Carrera PM, Kantarjian HM, Blinder VS (2018) The financial burden and distress of patients with cancer: understanding and stepping-up action on the financial toxicity of cancer treatment. CA Cancer J Clin 68:153–165
doi: 10.3322/caac.21443
de Souza JA, Yap BJ, Hlubocky FJ, Wroblewski K, Ratain MJ, Cella D, Daugherty CK (2014) The development of a financial toxicity patient-reported outcome in cancer: the COST measure. Cancer 120:3245–3253
doi: 10.1002/cncr.28814
Desai A, Gyawali B (2020) Financial toxicity of cancer treatment: moving the discussion from acknowledgement of the problem to identifying solutions. EClinicalMedicine 20:100269
doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100269
FAVO (Federazione Italiana delle Associazioni di Volontariato in Oncologia) (2012) 4° Rapporto sulla condizione assistenziale dei malati oncologici. https://www.favo.it/osservatorio/quarto-rapporto.html
FAVO CENSIS (2011) Ad alta voce - I tumori in Italia: i bisogni e le aspettative dei pazienti e delle famiglie. https://www.perunavitacomeprima.org/public/immagini/file/censis_2011.pdf
Goldstein DA (2017) Financial toxicity in cancer care-edging toward solutions. Cancer 123:1301–1302
doi: 10.1002/cncr.30555
Gordon LG, Merollini KMD, Lowe A, Chan RJ (2017) A systematic review of financial toxicity among cancer survivors: we can’t pay the co-pay. Patient 10:295–309
doi: 10.1007/s40271-016-0204-x
Lasch KE, Marquis P, Vigneux M, Abetz L, Arnould B, Bayliss M, Crawford B, Rosa K (2010) PRO development: rigorous qualitative research as the crucial foundation. Qual Life Res 19:1087–1096
doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9677-6
Marmot M (2005) Social determinants of health inequalities. Lancet 365:1099–1104
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71146-6
Marmot M, Friel S, Bell R, Houweling TA, Taylor S, Commission on social determinants of H (2008) Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Lancet 372:1661–1669
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61690-6
Mitchell T, Thompson L (1994) A theory of temporal adjustment of the evaluation of events: rosy prospection & rosy retrospection. In: Stubbart C, Porac J, Meindl J (eds) . JAI Press, Advances in managerial cognition and organizational information-processing, pp 85–114
Nederhof AJ (1985) Methods of coping with social desirability bias: a review. European Journal of Social Psychology 15:263–280
doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420150303
O'Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, Cook DA (2014) Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med 89:1245–1251
doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388
O'Connor JM, Kircher SM, de Souza JA (2016) Financial toxicity in cancer care. J Community Support Oncol 14:101–106
doi: 10.12788/jcso.0239
Onwuegbuzie AJ, Leech N, Collins KMT (2010) Innovative data collection strategies in qualitative research. Qualitative report 15:696–726
Patrick DL, Burke LB, Gwaltney CJ, Leidy NK, Martin ML, Molsen E, Ring L (2011) Content validity--establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO good research practices task force report: part 1--eliciting concepts for a new PRO instrument. Value Health 14:967–977
doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.014
Patrick DL, Burke LB, Gwaltney CJ, Leidy NK, Martin ML, Molsen E, Ring L (2011) Content validity--establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force report: part 2--assessing respondent understanding. Value Health
Perrone F, Di Maio M, Efficace F, Gallo C, Giannarelli D, Montesarchio V, Riva S (2019) Assessing financial toxicity in patients with cancer: moving away from a one-size-fits-all approach. J Oncol Pract JOP1900200
Perrone F, Jommi C, Di Maio M, Gimigliano A, Gridelli C, Pignata S, Ciardiello F, Nuzzo F, de Matteis A, Del Mastro L, Bryce J, Daniele G, Morabito A, Piccirillo MC, Rocco G, Guizzaro L, Gallo C (2016) The association of financial difficulties with clinical outcomes in cancer patients: secondary analysis of 16 academic prospective clinical trials conducted in Italy. Annals of oncology 27:2224–2229
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw433
Richardson JTE (1999) The concepts and methods of phenomenographic research. Review of educational research 69:53–82
doi: 10.3102/00346543069001053
Riva S, Bryce J, De Lorenzo F, Del Campo L, Di Maio M, Efficace F, Frontini L, Giannarelli D, Gitto L, Iannelli E, Jommi C, Montesarchio V, Traclo F, Vaccaro CM, Gallo C, Perrone F (2019) Development and validation of a patient-reported outcome tool to assess cancer-related financial toxicity in Italy: a protocol. BMJ Open 9:e031485
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031485
Rotter J, Spencer JC, Wheeler SB (2019) Financial toxicity in advanced and metastatic cancer: overburdened and underprepared. J Oncol Pract JOP1800518
Russell BH (2013) Social research methods - qualitative and quantitative approaches. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oakx, California
Seale C (1999) Quality in qualitative research 5:465–478
Sharp L, Carsin AE, Timmons A (2013) Associations between cancer-related financial stress and strain and psychological well-being among individuals living with cancer. Psychooncology 22:745–755
doi: 10.1002/pon.3055
Starks H, Trinidad SB (2007) Choose your method: a comparison of phenomenology, discourse analysis, and grounded theory. Qual Health Res 17:1372–1380
Stover AM, Haverman L, van Oers HA, Greenhalgh J, Potter CM, Group IPPiCPISW (2020) Using an implementation science approach to implement and evaluate patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) initiatives in routine care settings. Qual Life Res
Strauss A, Corbin J (1998) Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage, Thousand Oaks
Tesch R (1990) Qualitative research: analysis types and software. Routledge
Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J (2007) Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 19:349–357
doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
Zafar SY, Peppercorn JM, Schrag D, Taylor DH, Goetzinger AM, Zhong X, Abernethy AP (2013) The financial toxicity of cancer treatment: a pilot study assessing out-of-pocket expenses and the insured cancer patient's experience. Oncologist 18:381–390
doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0279