Do Patients Regret Having Received Systemic Treatment for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Prospective Evaluation.
Decision aid
Non-small cell lung cancer
Patient-reported outcomes
Quality of life
Regret
Journal
The oncologist
ISSN: 1549-490X
Titre abrégé: Oncologist
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9607837
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2021
03 2021
Historique:
received:
28
02
2020
accepted:
05
10
2020
pubmed:
25
10
2020
medline:
22
6
2021
entrez:
24
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Thousands of patients annually receive treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but little is known about their views on the decision to receive that treatment, or regret. This trial prospectively evaluated the incidence of regret and whether baseline characteristics, patient decision-making parameters, or clinical progress early in the treatment course predicts regret. Patients receiving systemic treatment for advanced NSCLC completed every 3-week patient reported outcome (PRO) assessment using the electronic Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (eLCSS-QL), including the 3-Item Global Index (3-IGI; assessing overall distress, activities, and quality of life [QL]). A prespecified secondary aim was to determine the frequency of regret evaluated at 3 months after starting treatment. Patients were randomized to usual care or enhanced care (which included use of the DecisionKEYS decision aid). Of 164 patients entered, 160 received treatment and 142 were evaluable for regret. In total, 11.5% of patients and 9% of their supporters expressed regret. Baseline characteristics did not predict regret; regret was rarely expressed by those who had a less than 20% decline or improvement in the 3-IGI PRO score after two treatment cycles. In contrast, when asked if they would make the same decision again, only 1% not having a 20% 3-IGI decline expressed regret, versus 14% with a 3-IGI decline (p = .01). The majority of patients having regret were identified early using the PRO 3-IGI of the eLCSS-QL measure. Identifying patients at risk for regret allows for interventions, including frank discussions of progress and goals early in the treatment course, which could address regret in patients and their supporters. This report documents prospectively, for the first time, the incidence of treatment-related regret in patients with advanced lung cancer and outlines that risk of regret is associated with patient-determined worsening health status early in the course of treatment. Identifying patients at risk for regret early in treatment (before the third cycle of treatment) appears to be crucial. Counseling at that time should include a discussion of consideration of treatment change and the reason for this change.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Thousands of patients annually receive treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but little is known about their views on the decision to receive that treatment, or regret. This trial prospectively evaluated the incidence of regret and whether baseline characteristics, patient decision-making parameters, or clinical progress early in the treatment course predicts regret.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Patients receiving systemic treatment for advanced NSCLC completed every 3-week patient reported outcome (PRO) assessment using the electronic Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (eLCSS-QL), including the 3-Item Global Index (3-IGI; assessing overall distress, activities, and quality of life [QL]). A prespecified secondary aim was to determine the frequency of regret evaluated at 3 months after starting treatment. Patients were randomized to usual care or enhanced care (which included use of the DecisionKEYS decision aid).
RESULTS
Of 164 patients entered, 160 received treatment and 142 were evaluable for regret. In total, 11.5% of patients and 9% of their supporters expressed regret. Baseline characteristics did not predict regret; regret was rarely expressed by those who had a less than 20% decline or improvement in the 3-IGI PRO score after two treatment cycles. In contrast, when asked if they would make the same decision again, only 1% not having a 20% 3-IGI decline expressed regret, versus 14% with a 3-IGI decline (p = .01).
CONCLUSION
The majority of patients having regret were identified early using the PRO 3-IGI of the eLCSS-QL measure. Identifying patients at risk for regret allows for interventions, including frank discussions of progress and goals early in the treatment course, which could address regret in patients and their supporters.
IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE
This report documents prospectively, for the first time, the incidence of treatment-related regret in patients with advanced lung cancer and outlines that risk of regret is associated with patient-determined worsening health status early in the course of treatment. Identifying patients at risk for regret early in treatment (before the third cycle of treatment) appears to be crucial. Counseling at that time should include a discussion of consideration of treatment change and the reason for this change.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33098189
doi: 10.1002/onco.13571
pmc: PMC7930410
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
224-230Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA157409
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2020 AlphaMed Press.
Références
Cancer. 1994 Apr 15;73(8):2087-98
pubmed: 8156514
Med Decis Making. 1995 Jan-Mar;15(1):25-30
pubmed: 7898294
J Oncol Pract. 2015 Nov;11(6):486-90
pubmed: 26464496
N Engl J Med. 2017 Oct 19;377(16):1507-1509
pubmed: 29045218
Support Care Cancer. 1999 May;7(3):140-8
pubmed: 10335932
West J Med. 2001 Apr;174(4):247-53
pubmed: 11290678
Med Decis Making. 2003 Jul-Aug;23(4):281-92
pubmed: 12926578
Support Care Cancer. 2013 Jan;21(1):165-72
pubmed: 22684988
Cancer. 2014 Apr 1;120 Suppl 7:1091-6
pubmed: 24643646
J Thorac Oncol. 2014 Sep;9(9):1243-8
pubmed: 25122420
Support Care Cancer. 2013 Mar;21(3):889-99
pubmed: 23052911
JAMA. 1999 Dec 22-29;282(24):2313-20
pubmed: 10612318
N Engl J Med. 2010 Aug 19;363(8):733-42
pubmed: 20818875
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2014;32(1):112-23
pubmed: 24428254
Support Care Cancer. 2019 May;27(5):1613-1637
pubmed: 30737578
Med Decis Making. 2016 Aug;36(6):777-90
pubmed: 26975351
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2013 Jan;40(1):E24-31
pubmed: 23269778