Reduction of breathing artifacts in multifrequency magnetic resonance elastography of the abdomen.


Journal

Magnetic resonance in medicine
ISSN: 1522-2594
Titre abrégé: Magn Reson Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8505245

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 2021
Historique:
received: 03 04 2020
revised: 21 08 2020
accepted: 28 09 2020
pubmed: 27 10 2020
medline: 15 5 2021
entrez: 26 10 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

With abdominal magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) often suffering from breathing artifacts, it is recommended to perform MRE during breath-hold. However, breath-hold acquisition prohibits extended multifrequency MRE examinations and yields inconsistent results when patients cannot hold their breath. The purpose of this work was to analyze free-breathing strategies in multifrequency MRE of abdominal organs. Abdominal MRE with 30, 40, 50, and 60 Hz vibration frequencies and single-shot, multislice, full wave-field acquisition was performed four times in 11 healthy volunteers: once with multiple breath-holds and three times during free breathing with ungated, gated, and navigated slice adjustment. Shear wave speed maps were generated by tomoelastography inversion. Image registration was applied for correction of intrascan misregistration of image slices. Sharpness of features was quantified by the variance of the Laplacian. Total scan times ranged from 120 seconds for ungated free-breathing MRE to 376 seconds for breath-hold examinations. As expected, free-breathing MRE resulted in larger organ displacements (liver, 4.7 ± 1.5 mm; kidneys, 2.4 ± 2.2 mm; spleen, 3.1 ± 2.4 mm; pancreas, 3.4 ± 1.4 mm) than breath-hold MRE (liver, 0.7 ± 0.2 mm; kidneys, 0.4 ± 0.2 mm; spleen, 0.5 ± 0.2 mm; pancreas, 0.7 ± 0.5 mm). Nonetheless, breathing-related displacement did not affect mean shear wave speed, which was consistent across all protocols (liver, 1.43 ± 0.07 m/s; kidneys, 2.35 ± 0.21 m/s; spleen, 2.02 ± 0.15 m/s; pancreas, 1.39 ± 0.15 m/s). Image registration before inversion improved the quality of free-breathing examinations, yielding no differences in image sharpness to uncorrected breath-hold MRE in most organs (P > .05). Overall, multifrequency MRE is robust to breathing when considering whole-organ values. Respiration-related blurring can readily be corrected using image registration. Consequently, ungated free-breathing MRE combined with image registration is recommended for multifrequency MRE of abdominal organs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33104294
doi: 10.1002/mrm.28558
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1962-1973

Informations de copyright

© 2020 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Références

Venkatesh SK, Yin M, Ehman RL. Magnetic resonance elastography of liver: Technique, analysis, and clinical applications. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013;37:544-555.
Venkatesh SK, Ehman RL. Magnetic resonance elastography of abdomen. Abdom Imaging. 2015;40:745-759.
Garteiser P, Doblas S, Van Beers BE. Magnetic resonance elastography of liver and spleen: Methods and applications. NMR Biomed. 2018;31:e3891.
Huwart L, Sempoux C, Salameh N, et al. Liver fibrosis: Noninvasive assessment with MR elastography versus aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index. Radiology. 2007;245:458-466.
Yin M, Talwalkar JA, Glaser KJ, et al. Assessment of hepatic fibrosis with magnetic resonance elastography. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5:1207-1213.e1202.
Guo J, Buening C, Schott E, et al. In vivo abdominal MR elastography for the assessment of portal hypertension before and after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) implantation. Investigative Radiology. 2015;50:347-351.
Navin PJ, Gidener T, Allen AM, et al. The role of magnetic resonance elastography in the diagnosis of noncirrhotic portal hypertension. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;s1542-3565(19)31162-0.
Marticorena Garcia SR, Fischer T, Durr M, et al. Multifrequency magnetic resonance elastography for the assessment of renal allograft function. Invest Radiol. 2016;51:591-595.
Lang ST, Guo J, Bruns A, et al. Multiparametric quantitative MRI for the detection of IgA nephropathy using tomoelastography, DWI, and BOLD imaging. Invest Radiol. 2019;54:669-674.
Marticorena Garcia SR, Grossmann M, Bruns A, et al. Tomoelastography paired with T2* magnetic resonance imaging detects lupus nephritis with normal renal function. Invest Radiol. 2019;54:89-97.
Garteiser P, Doblas S, Daire JL, et al. MR elastography of liver tumours: Value of viscoelastic properties for tumour characterisation. Eur Radiol. 2012;22:2169-2177.
Shi Y, Gao F, Li Y, et al. Differentiation of benign and malignant solid pancreatic masses using magnetic resonance elastography with spin-echo echo planar imaging and three-dimensional inversion reconstruction: A prospective study. Eur Radiol. 2018;28:936-945.
Gordic S, Ayache JB, Kennedy P, et al. Value of tumor stiffness measured with MR elastography for assessment of response of hepatocellular carcinoma to locoregional therapy. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017;42:1685-1694.
Shahryari M, Tzschatzsch H, Guo J, et al. Tomoelastography distinguishes noninvasively between benign and malignant liver lesions. Cancer Res. 2019;79:5704-5710.
Muthupillai R, Lomas DJ, Rossman PJ, Greenleaf JF, Manduca A, Ehman RL. Magnetic resonance elastography by direct visualization of propagating acoustic strain waves. Science. 1995;269:1854-1857.
Hirsch S, Braun J, Sack I. Magnetic Resonance Elastography: Physical Background and Medical Applications. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH; 2017:456.
Murphy IG, Graves MJ, Reid S, et al. Comparison of breath-hold, respiratory navigated and free-breathing MR elastography of the liver. Magn Reson Imaging. 2017;37:46-50.
QIBA MR Elastography Biomarker Committee. Magnetic Resonance Elastography of the Liver, Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance. 2. Profile Stage: Consensus. QIBA, June 6, 2019. http://qibawiki.rsna.org/index.php/Profiles. Accessed January 4, 2020.
Majeed W, Kalra P, Kolipaka A. Simultaneous multislice rapid magnetic resonance elastography of the liver. NMR Biomed. 2020;33:e4252.
Ebersole C, Ahmad R, Rich AV, Potter LC, Dong H, Kolipaka A. A Bayesian method for accelerated magnetic resonance elastography of the liver. Magn Reson Med. 2018;80:1178-1188.
Kennedy P, Wagner M, Castera L, et al. Quantitative elastography methods in liver disease: Current evidence and future directions. Radiology. 2018;286:738-763.
Ipek-Ugay S, Tzschatzsch H, Braun J, Fischer T, Sack I. Physiologic reduction of hepatic venous blood flow by the Valsalva Maneuver decreases liver stiffness. J Ultrasound Med. 2017;36:1305-1311.
Millonig G, Friedrich S, Adolf S, et al. Liver stiffness is directly influenced by central venous pressure. J Hepatol. 2010;52:206-210.
Hudert CA, Tzschatzsch H, Rudolph B, et al. Tomoelastography for the evaluation of pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Invest Radiol. 2019;54:198-203.
Marticorena Garcia SR, Grossmann M, Lang ST, et al. Tomoelastography of the native kidney: Regional variation and physiological effects on in vivo renal stiffness. Magn Reson Med. 2018;79:2126-2134.
Hirsch S, Guo J, Reiter R, et al. MR elastography of the liver and the spleen using a piezoelectric driver, single-shot wave-field acquisition, and multifrequency dual parameter reconstruction. Magn Reson Med. 2014;71:267-277.
Asbach P, Klatt D, Schlosser B, et al. Viscoelasticity-based staging of hepatic fibrosis with multifrequency MR elastography. Radiology. 2010;257:80-86.
Etchell E, Juge L, Hatt A, Sinkus R, Bilston LE. Liver stiffness values are lower in pediatric subjects than in adults and increase with age: A multifrequency MR elastography study. Radiology. 2017;283:222-230.
Dittmann F, Reiter R, Guo J, et al. Tomoelastography of the prostate using multifrequency MR elastography and externally placed pressurized-air drivers. Magn Reson Med. 2018;79:1325-1333.
Henningsson M, Botnar RM. Advanced respiratory motion compensation for coronary MR angiography. Sensors (Basel). 2013;13:6882-6899.
Klein S, Staring M, Murphy K, Viergever MA, Pluim JP. elastix: A toolbox for intensity-based medical image registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010;29:196-205.
Mattes D, Haynor DR, Vesselle H, Lewellen TK, Eubank W. PET-CT image registration in the chest using free-form deformations. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2003;22:120-128.
Tzschatzsch H, Guo J, Dittmann F, et al. Tomoelastography by multifrequency wave number recovery from time-harmonic propagating shear waves. Med Image Anal. 2016;30:1-10.
Meyer T, Tzschätzsch H, Braun J, Kalra P, Kolipaka A, Sack I. Online platform for extendable server-based processing of magnetic resonance elastography data. In: Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Montreal, Canada, 2019. Abstract. 3966.
Reiter R, Tzschatzsch H, Schwahofer F, et al. Diagnostic performance of tomoelastography of the liver and spleen for staging hepatic fibrosis. Eur Radiol. 2020;30:1719-1729.
Pech-Pacheco JL, Cristobal G, Chamorro-Martinez J, Fernandez-Valdivia J. Diatom autofocusing in brightfield microscopy: a comparative study. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Barcelona, Spain, 2000. pp 314-317.
Gandhi D, Kalra P, Raterman B, Mo X, Dong H, Kolipaka A. Magnetic resonance elastography of kidneys: SE-EPI MRE reproducibility and its comparison to GRE MRE. NMR Biomed. 2019;32:e4141.
Gandhi D, Kalra P, Raterman B, Mo X, Dong H, Kolipaka A. Magnetic resonance elastography-derived stiffness of the kidneys and its correlation with water perfusion. NMR Biomed. 2020;33:e4237.
Kolipaka A, Schroeder S, Mo X, Shah Z, Hart PA, Conwell DL. Magnetic resonance elastography of the pancreas: Measurement reproducibility and relationship with age. Magn Reson Imaging. 2017;42:1-7.
Dittmann F, Tzschatzsch H, Hirsch S, et al. Tomoelastography of the abdomen: Tissue mechanical properties of the liver, spleen, kidney, and pancreas from single MR elastography scans at different hydration states. Magn Reson Med. 2017;78:976-983.
Glaser KJ, Chen J, Ehman RL. Fast 2D hepatic MR elastography for free-breathing and short breath hold applications. In: Proceedings of the 24th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Singapore, 2015. Abstract 2522.
Li J, Dzyubak B, Glaser KJ, et al. Repeatability and clinical performance of non-gated, free-breathing, MR elastography (MRE) of the liver. In: Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Montreal, Canada, 2019. Abstract 3972.
Brandner ED, Wu A, Chen H, et al. Abdominal organ motion measured using 4D CT. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;65:554-560.
Dzyubak B, Venkatesh SK, Manduca A, Glaser KJ, Ehman RL. Automated liver elasticity calculation for MR elastography. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016;43:1055-1063.
Kim DW, Kim SY, Yoon HM, Kim KW, Byun JH. Comparison of technical failure of MR elastography for measuring liver stiffness between gradient-recalled echo and spin-echo echo-planar imaging: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020;51:1086-1102.
Yin M, Glaser KJ, Manduca A, et al. Distinguishing between hepatic inflammation and fibrosis with MR elastography. Radiology. 2017;284:694-705.

Auteurs

Mehrgan Shahryari (M)

Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Tom Meyer (T)

Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Carsten Warmuth (C)

Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Helge Herthum (H)

Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Gergely Bertalan (G)

Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Heiko Tzschätzsch (H)

Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Lisa Stencel (L)

Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Steffen Lukas (S)

Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Ledia Lilaj (L)

Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Jürgen Braun (J)

Institute of Medical Informatics, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Ingolf Sack (I)

Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH