Endoscopic submucosal dissection of large polyps in the right colon using an endoscopic snare with a double-balloon endolumenal interventional platform: an ex vivo study in a porcine colorectal model.
Double-balloon endolumenal interventional platform
ESD
Endoscopic snare
Traction
Journal
Surgical endoscopy
ISSN: 1432-2218
Titre abrégé: Surg Endosc
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8806653
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2021
11 2021
Historique:
received:
04
04
2020
accepted:
15
10
2020
pubmed:
27
10
2020
medline:
26
10
2021
entrez:
26
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a challenging procedure for the removal of colorectal tumors, especially tumors located in the right colon. The use of traction could make this procedure technically easier and reduce procedure times and complication rates. In this study, we demonstrated the feasibility and utility of a traction technique utilizing an endoscopic snare through an overtube, a double-balloon endolumenal interventional platform (DEIP) in a porcine colorectal model. A total of 120 procedures were performed using three different techniques: standard ESD technique (STD), ESD with DEIP (DEIP alone), and ESD with DEIP and a snare (DEIP + Snare). The snare was passed inside the overtube and used as a grasper on the tissue to provide traction. Lesions 3 or 4 cm in diameter were removed with a 5 mm margin from the anterior and posterior walls of the proximal Transverse Colon, the Hepatic Flexure, and the posterior wall of the Cecum. The outcomes measured included procedure times and the number of muscularis propria injuries. The DEIP + Snare group showed significantly shorter total procedure and submucosal dissection times for lesions in all locations (median 28.1 min (DEIP + Snare, n = 32) vs 39.8 (STD, n = 32) vs 39.7 (DEIP alone, n = 32); 7.5 min vs 25.3 vs 25.1) and had fewer muscularis propria injuries (median 0 [range 0-2] vs 2 [0-7] vs 1 [0-6]) than the two other groups. Larger lesions (4 cm) were successfully removed by regrasping the tissue in DEIP + Snare group, which showed significantly shorter total procedure time [31.4 min (DEIP + Snare, n = 8) vs 40.1 (STD, n = 8) vs 45.6 (DEIP alone, n = 8)] and submucosal dissection time (12.3 min vs 27.6 vs 29.1) than the two other groups. ESD traction technique with an endolumenal platform and snare enables faster removal of large polyps in the right colon with fewer injuries than standard methods of ESD.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a challenging procedure for the removal of colorectal tumors, especially tumors located in the right colon. The use of traction could make this procedure technically easier and reduce procedure times and complication rates. In this study, we demonstrated the feasibility and utility of a traction technique utilizing an endoscopic snare through an overtube, a double-balloon endolumenal interventional platform (DEIP) in a porcine colorectal model.
METHODS
A total of 120 procedures were performed using three different techniques: standard ESD technique (STD), ESD with DEIP (DEIP alone), and ESD with DEIP and a snare (DEIP + Snare). The snare was passed inside the overtube and used as a grasper on the tissue to provide traction. Lesions 3 or 4 cm in diameter were removed with a 5 mm margin from the anterior and posterior walls of the proximal Transverse Colon, the Hepatic Flexure, and the posterior wall of the Cecum. The outcomes measured included procedure times and the number of muscularis propria injuries.
RESULTS
The DEIP + Snare group showed significantly shorter total procedure and submucosal dissection times for lesions in all locations (median 28.1 min (DEIP + Snare, n = 32) vs 39.8 (STD, n = 32) vs 39.7 (DEIP alone, n = 32); 7.5 min vs 25.3 vs 25.1) and had fewer muscularis propria injuries (median 0 [range 0-2] vs 2 [0-7] vs 1 [0-6]) than the two other groups. Larger lesions (4 cm) were successfully removed by regrasping the tissue in DEIP + Snare group, which showed significantly shorter total procedure time [31.4 min (DEIP + Snare, n = 8) vs 40.1 (STD, n = 8) vs 45.6 (DEIP alone, n = 8)] and submucosal dissection time (12.3 min vs 27.6 vs 29.1) than the two other groups.
CONCLUSIONS
ESD traction technique with an endolumenal platform and snare enables faster removal of large polyps in the right colon with fewer injuries than standard methods of ESD.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33104913
doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08100-7
pii: 10.1007/s00464-020-08100-7
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
6319-6328Informations de copyright
© 2020. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Yoshida N, Wakabayashi N, Kanemasa K, Sumida Y, Hasegawa D, Inoue K, Morimoto Y, Kashiwa A, Konishi H, Yagi N, Naito Y, Yanagisawa A, Yoshikawa T (2009) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors: technical difficulties and rate of perforation. Endoscopy 41:758–761
doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1215028
Isomoto H, Nishiyama H, Yamaguchi N, Fukuda E, Ishii H, Ikeda K, Ohnita K, Nakao K, Kohno S, Shikuwa S (2009) Clinicopathological factors associated with clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal epithelial neoplasms. Endoscopy 41:679–683
doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1214979
Saito Y, Uraoka T, Matsuda T, Emura F, Ikehara H, Mashimo Y, Kikuchi T, Fu KI, Sano Y, Saito D (2007) Endoscopic treatment of large superficial colorectal tumors: a case series of 200 endoscopic submucosal dissections (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 66:966–973
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.02.053
Zhou PH, Yao LQ, Qin XY (2009) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal epithelial neoplasm. Surg Endosc 23:1546–1551
doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0395-5
Niimi K, Fujishiro M, Kodashima S, Goto O, Ono S, Hirano K, Minatsuki C, Yamamichi N, Koike K (2010) Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal epithelial neoplasms. Endoscopy 42:723–729
doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1255675
Kim ES, Cho KB, Park KS, Lee KI, Jang BK, Chung WJ, Hwang JS (2011) Factors predictive of perforation during endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of colorectal tumors. Endoscopy 43:573–578
doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256339
Lee EJ, Lee JB, Choi YS, Lee SH, Lee DH, Kim DS, Youk EG (2012) Clinical risk factors for perforation during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for large-sized, nonpedunculated colorectal tumors. Surg Endosc 26:1587–1594
doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2075-5
Sakamoto T, Saito Y, Fukunaga S, Nakajima T, Matsuda T (2011) Learning curve associated with colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for endoscopists experienced in gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection. Dis Colon Rectum 54:1307–1312
doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182282ab0
Peery AF, Cools KS, Strassle PD, McGill SK, Crockett SD, Barker A, Koruda M, Grimm IS (2018) Increasing rates of surgery for patients with nonmalignant colorectal polyps in the United States. Gastroenterology 154:1352.e3-1360.e3
doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.01.003
Tsuji K, Yoshida N, Nakanishi H, Takemura K, Yamada S, Doyama H (2016) Recent traction methods for endoscopic submucosal dissection. World J Gastroenterol 22:5917–5926
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i26.5917
Sharma SK, Hiratsuka T, Hara H, Milsom JW (2018) Antigravity ESD - double-balloon-assisted underwater with traction hybrid technique. Endosc Int Open 6:E739–E744
doi: 10.1055/a-0578-8081
Sharma S, Momose K, Hara H, East J, Sumiyama K, Nakajima K, Silbehumer G, Milsom J (2019) Facilitating endoscopic submucosal dissection: double balloon endolumenal platform significantly improves dissection time compared with conventional technique (with video). Surg Endosc 33:315–321
doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6336-4
Jung D, Youn YH, Jahng J, Kim JH, Park H (2013) Risk of electrocoagulation syndrome after endoscopic submucosal dissection in the colon and rectum. Endoscopy 45:714–717
doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1344555
Sharma SK, Momose K, Sedrakyan A, Sonoda T, Sharaiha RZ (2019) Endoscopic stabilization device evaluation using IDEAL framework: a quality improvement study. Int J Surg 67:18–23
doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.02.010
Wang F, Leng X, Gao Y, Zhao K, Sun Y, Bian H, Liu H, Liu P (2019) Endoscopic submucosal dissection of distal intestinal tumors using grasping forceps for traction. Tech Coloproctol 23:1079–1083
doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-02102-x
Uraoka T, Ishikawa S, Kato J, Higashi R, Suzuki H, Kaji E, Kuriyama M, Saito S, Akita M, Hori K, Harada K, Ishiyama S, Shiode J, Kawahara Y, Yamamoto K (2010) Advantages of using thin endoscope-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection technique for large colorectal tumors. Dig Endosc 22:186–191
doi: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2010.00992.x
Ito S, Hotta K, Imai K, Yamaguchi Y, Kishida Y, Takizawa K, Kakushima N, Tanaka M, Kawata N, Yoshida M, Ishiwatari H, Matsubayashi H, Ono H (2018) Risk factors of post-endoscopic submucosal dissection electrocoagulation syndrome for colorectal neoplasm. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 33:2001–2006
doi: 10.1111/jgh.14302
Sato K, Ito S, Kitagawa T, Kato M, Tominaga K, Suzuki T, Maetani I (2014) Factors affecting the technical difficulty and clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors. Surg Endosc 28:2959–2965
doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3558-y
Yamada S, Doyama H, Ota R, Takeda Y, Tsuji K, Tsuji S, Yoshida N (2016) Impact of the clip and snare method using the prelooping technique for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Endoscopy 48:281–285
doi: 10.1055/s-0042-112973
Teoh AY, Chiu PW, Hon SF, Mak TW, Ng EK, Lau JY (2013) Ex vivo comparative study using the Endolifter(R) as a traction device for enhancing submucosal visualization during endoscopic submucosal dissection. Surg Endosc 27:1422–1427
doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2583-y
Sakamoto N, Osada T, Shibuya T, Beppu K, Matsumoto K, Mori H, Kawabe M, Nagahara A, Otaka M, Ogihara T, Watanabe S (2009) Endoscopic submucosal dissection of large colorectal tumors by using a novel spring-action S-O clip for traction (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 69:1370–1374
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.12.245
Matsuzaki I, Hattori M, Yamauchi H, Goto N, Iwata Y, Yokoi T, Tsunemi M, Kobayashi M, Yamamura T, Miyahara R (2020) Magnetic anchor-guided endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors (with video). Surg Endosc 34:1012–1018
doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07127-9
Yandrapu H, Desai M, Siddique S, Vennalganti P, Vennalaganti S, Parasa S, Rai T, Kanakadandi V, Bansal A, Titi M, Repici A, Bechtold ML, Sharma P, Choudhary A (2017) Normal saline solution versus other viscous solutions for submucosal injection during endoscopic mucosal resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 85:693–699
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.12.003