A Pedagogical Approach to Integrative Neuromuscular Training to Improve Motor Competence in Children: A Randomized Controlled Trail.
Journal
Journal of strength and conditioning research
ISSN: 1533-4287
Titre abrégé: J Strength Cond Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9415084
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2020
Nov 2020
Historique:
entrez:
26
10
2020
pubmed:
27
10
2020
medline:
7
4
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Font-Lladó, R, López-Ros, V, Montalvo, AM, Sinclair, G, Prats Puig, A, and Fort-Vanmeerhaeghe, A. A pedagogical approach to integrative neuromuscular training to improve motor competence in children: a RCT. J Strength Cond Res 34(11): 3078-3085, 2020-To assess the effectiveness of a pedagogical approach to an integrative neuromuscular training (INT) program as a warm-up in physical education (PE) lessons in healthy children: (a) to improve the level of motor competence (MC) and (b) to master fundamental motor skills (FMS) patterns, considering the baseline MC level and the time spent when performing different motor tasks. One hundred ninety students (7.43 ± 0.32 years; 52% girls) were included in this randomized controlled trail and grouped up according to MC basal levels (L1-L4). Motor competence and FMS patterns (CAMSA protocol) were assessed before and after the intervention in a group-based INT warm-up (n = 97) and a group-based conventional warm-up (n = 93). The INT program improved MC (p < 0.001; d = 0.71) and FMS (p < 0.001, d = 0.52). The independent predictors of MC change were: baseline MC level (β = -196; p < 0.012), time spent to perform the task (β = -0.235 p < 0.003), and participation in the INT program (β = 0.201; p < 0.005), explaining 71% of its variability. The INT warm-up shows correlations between improvements in MC in relation to time reduction (L1 p = 0.016, d, L2 p = 0.001, and L4 = 0.001) and FMS patterns (L1 p < 0.001, L2 p < 0.003, L3 p < 0.005, and L4 < 0.001) Moreover, only L3, it showed correlation between changes in time and FMS mastery (p = 0.001). Our results showed that a pedagogical approach to an INT program developed as a warm-up in primary school PE lessons can improve MC and FMS patterns in all subjects, independent of the initial MC level. More interestingly, only in L3, the improvement in MC can be explained by the balance in time required to perform the task and the level of improvement in FMS patterns.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33105357
doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003772
pii: 00124278-202011000-00009
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3078-3085Références
Allison PC, Barret KR. Connecting what you teach to why you teach it. In: Constructing Children's Physical Education Experiences. Understanding the Content for Teaching. Boston, MA: Allyn, 2000. pp. 13–81.
Balyi I, Hamilton A. Long-term athlete development: Trainability in childhood and adolescence. In: Windows of Opportunity. Optimal Trainability. Victoria, United Kingdom: National Coaching Institute British Columbia & Advanced Training and Performance Ltd, 2004. pp. 194.
Barnett LM, van Beurden E, Morgan PJ, Brooks LO, Beard JR. Childhood motor skill proficiency as a predictor of adolescent physical activity. J Adolescheal44: 252–259, 2009.
Clark JE, Metcalfe JS. The mountain of motor development: A metaphor. In. Motor Development: Research and Reviews. Vol 2. Clark JE, Humphrey JH, eds. Reston, VA: NASPE Publications, 2002. pp. 163–190.
Connolly K, Bruner JS. Competence: Its nature and nuture. In: The Growth of Competence. London: Academic Press, 1973. pp. 3–7.
Davids K, Button C, Bennett S. Traditional theories of skill acquisition. In: Dynamics of Skill Acquisition. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2008. pp. 3–29.
Fitts PM, Posner MI. Speed versus accuracy. In: Human Performance. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole Pub. Co, 1967. pp. 109–112.
Fort-Vanmeerhaeghe A, Román-Viñas B, Font-Lladó R. Why is it important to develop motor competence in child34hood and adolescence? The basis for a healthy lifestyle. Apunts Medicina de l'Esport103–112, 2017.
Fort-Vanmeerhaeghe A, Romero-Rodriguez D, Lloyd RS, Kushner A, Myer GD. Integrative neuromuscular training in youth athletes. Part II: Strategies to prevent injuries and improve performance. Strength Cond J38: 9–27, 2016.
Gallahue D, Ozmun J, Goodway J. Motor development: Theoretical models. In: Understanding Motor Development: Infants, Children, adolescents, adults (8th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2012. pp. 46–62.
Gentile AM. Skill acquisition: Action, movement, and neuromotor processes. In. Carr JH, Shepard RB, eds. Movement Science: Foundations for Physical Therapy(2nd ed.). Rockville, MD: Aspen, 2000. pp. 111–187.
Haibach P, Reid G, Collier D. Infant motor development. In: Motor Learning and Development. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2018. pp. 98–114.
Haywood K. Theoretical perspectives in motor development. In: Life Span Motor Development(7th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2019. pp. 17–27.
Kozieł SM, Malina RM. Modified maturity offset prediction equations: Validation in independent longitudinal samples of boys and girls. Sports Med48: 221–236, 2017.
Lander N, Eather N, Morgan PJ, Salmon J, Barnett LM. Characteristics of teacher training in school-based physical education interventions to improve fundamental movement skills and/or physical activity: A systematic review. Sports Med47: 135–161, 2016.
Lloyd R, Oliver J. The youth physical development model: A new approach to long-term athletic development. Strength Cond J34: 61–72, 2012.
Logan SW, Ross SM, Chee K, Stodden DF, Robinson L. Fundamental motor skills: A systematic review of terminology. J Sports Sci36: 781–796, 2017.
Longmuir PE, Boyer C, Lloyd M, et al. Canadian Agility and Movement Skill Assessment (CAMSA): Validity, objectivity, and reliability evidence for children 8-12 years of age. J Sport Health Sci6: 231–240, 2017.
Lubans DR, Morgan PJ, Cliff DP, Barnett LM, Okely AD. Fundamental movement skills in children and adolescents. Review of associated health benefits. Sports Med40: 1019–1035, 2010.
Malina RM, Bouchard C. Motor development. In: Growth, Maturation, and Physical Activity(2nd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetic Pub; 2004. pp. 195–214.
Malina RM, Rogol AD, Cumming SP, et al. Biological maturation of youth athletes: Assessment and implications. Br J Sports Med49: 852–859, 2015.
McKenzie TL, Lounsbery M. Physical education teacher effectiveness in a public health context. Res Q Exerc Sport84: 419–430, 2013.
Morgan PJ, Barnett LM, Cliff DP, et al. Fundamental movement skill interventions in youth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatrics132: e1361–e1383, 2013.
Myer GD, Faigenbaum AD, Chu DA, et al. Integrative training for children and adolescents: Techniques and practices for reducing sports-related injuries and enhancing athletic performance. Phys Sports Med39: 74–84, 2011.
Myer GD, Faigenbaum AD, Ford KR, et al. When to initiate integrative neuromuscular training to reduce sports-related injuries and enhance health in youth?Cur Sports Med Rep: 157–166, 2011.
Myer GD, Lloyd RS, Brent JL. How young is too young to start training?ACS Ms Heal Fit J17: 14–23, 2013.
Newell KM. Constraints on the development of coordination revisited. J Sport Exerc Psychol22s2, 2000.
Physical education curriculum for secondary school. Decree 187/2015. Generalitat de Catalunya Official Report. 6945. pp. 245–259.
Platvoet S, Faber IR, de Niet M, et al. Development of a tool to assess fundamental movement skills in applied settings. Front Educ3: 75, 2018.
Robinson LE, Stodden DF, Barnett LM, et al. Motor competence and its effect on positive developmental trajectories of health. Sports Med45: 1273–1284, 2015.
Rudd JR, Barnett LM, Butson ML, et al. Fundamental movement skills are more than run, throw and catch: The role of stability skills. PLoS One10: 10, 2015.
Schmidt RA, Lee TD. Motor programs. Motor control and brief actions. In: Motor Learning and Performance. From Principles to Application(5th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2014. pp. 89–123.
Schmidt RA. Motor Schema theory after 27 years: Reflections and implications for a new theory. Res Q ExercSport74: 366–375, 2003.
Stodden DF, Goodway JD, Langendorfer SJ, et al. A developmental perspective on the role of motor skill competence in physical activity: An emergent relationship. Quest60: 290–306, 2008.
Turvey MT, Fitch HL, Tuller B. The Bernstein perspective: The problems of degrees of freedom and context conditioned variability. In. Kelso JAS, ed. Human Motor Behavior: An Introduction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1982. pp. 239–252.
Viru A, Loko J, Harro M, et al. Critical periods in the development of performance capacity during childhood and adolescence. Eur J Phys Educ4: 75–119, 1999.
Wang J. Key principles of open motor-skill training for peak performance. JOPERD87: 8–15, 2016.
Wulf G, Schith RA. Feedback-induced variability and the learning of generalized motor programs. J Mot Behav26: 348–361, 1994.
Wulf G.. Internal versus external focus feedback. In: Attention and Motor Learning. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2007. pp. 83–106.