Lack of Serologic Evidence of Infection Among Health Care Personnel and Other Contacts of First 2 Confirmed Patients With COVID-19 in Illinois, 2020.
COVID-19
/ epidemiology
Contact Tracing
/ statistics & numerical data
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
Female
Health Personnel
/ statistics & numerical data
Humans
Illinois
/ epidemiology
Male
Occupational Exposure
/ statistics & numerical data
Pandemics
Personal Protective Equipment
Risk Assessment
SARS-CoV-2
COVID-19
SARS-CoV-2
antibodies
epidemiology
serology
Journal
Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)
ISSN: 1468-2877
Titre abrégé: Public Health Rep
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9716844
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
pubmed:
29
10
2020
medline:
29
12
2020
entrez:
28
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Widespread global transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus causing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), continues. Many questions remain about asymptomatic or atypical infections and transmission dynamics. We used comprehensive contact tracing of the first 2 confirmed patients in Illinois with COVID-19 and serologic SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing to determine whether contacts had evidence of undetected COVID-19. Contacts were eligible for serologic follow-up if previously tested for COVID-19 during an initial investigation or had greater-risk exposures. Contacts completed a standardized questionnaire during the initial investigation. We classified exposure risk as high, medium, or low based on interactions with 2 index patients and use of personal protective equipment (PPE). Serologic testing used a SARS-CoV-2 spike enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay on serum specimens collected from participants approximately 6 weeks after initial exposure to either index patient. The 2 index patients provided serum specimens throughout their illness. We collected data on demographic, exposure, and epidemiologic characteristics. Of 347 contacts, 110 were eligible for serologic follow-up; 59 (17% of all contacts) enrolled. Of these, 53 (90%) were health care personnel and 6 (10%) were community contacts. Seventeen (29%) reported high-risk exposures, 15 (25%) medium-risk, and 27 (46%) low-risk. No participant had evidence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. The 2 index patients had antibodies detected at dilutions >1:6400 within 4 weeks after symptom onset. In serologic follow-up of the first 2 known patients in Illinois with COVID-19, we found no secondary transmission among tested contacts. Lack of seroconversion among these contacts adds to our understanding of conditions (ie, use of PPE) under which SARS-CoV-2 infections might not result in transmission and demonstrates that SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing is a useful tool to verify epidemiologic findings.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33108976
doi: 10.1177/0033354920966064
pmc: PMC7856379
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
88-96Références
Emerg Infect Dis. 2007 Oct;13(10):1562-4
pubmed: 18258008
JAMA. 2020 May 26;323(20):2087-2089
pubmed: 32301962
Lancet. 2020 Apr 4;395(10230):1137-1144
pubmed: 32178768
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Apr 03;69(13):377-381
pubmed: 32240128
Lancet. 2020 Mar 28;395(10229):1054-1062
pubmed: 32171076
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Mar 27;69(12):347-352
pubmed: 32214086
Emerg Infect Dis. 2004 Feb;10(2):256-60
pubmed: 15030693
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Mar 15;64(6):736-742
pubmed: 28011603
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Apr 10;69(14):411-415
pubmed: 32271722
Nat Med. 2020 May;26(5):672-675
pubmed: 32296168
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Apr 17;69(15):446-450
pubmed: 32298246
J Infect Dis. 2010 May 15;201(10):1509-16
pubmed: 20377412
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Apr 17;69(15):472-476
pubmed: 32298249