Management of Pain and Anxiety during Bone Marrow Aspiration: An Italian National Survey.


Journal

Pain management nursing : official journal of the American Society of Pain Management Nurses
ISSN: 1532-8635
Titre abrégé: Pain Manag Nurs
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100890606

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2021
Historique:
received: 01 04 2020
revised: 19 08 2020
accepted: 09 09 2020
pubmed: 29 10 2020
medline: 26 11 2021
entrez: 28 10 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Bone marrow aspiration (BMA) or biopsy is a necessary and frequent procedure for diagnosis and monitoring of hematological diseases. Pharmacological pain management approaches exist; however, previous experience and psychological preparation for BMA may impact pain perception. This study aimed to explore current practices in procedural pain management for BMA or biopsy. A cross-sectional internet-based survey was performed by the Nurses Group of the Italian Transplant Group (GITMO). Participants were nurses working in bone marrow transplant centers regularly performing BMA/biopsies. Sixty out of 94 centers receiving the survey responded (63.8%), 47 adult and 13 pediatric centers. The majority of them (75%) provided only verbal information for patient preparation before BMA. . Injected local anesthetics were used in 55.4% of centers, and combined with topical anesthetics in 33.9% of centers. Use of oral anesthetics was rare; however, anxiolytics and benzodiazepines were occasionally used (18.3%, 18.3% respectively). All pediatric centers used deep sedation for the procedure (p < .001), but drug choice depended on anesthetist preference. Ice packs (35.0%) and oral analgesia as required (40.0%) were used for postprocedural pain. Nurses perceived their patients' pain scores as relatively low (3.5 on scale 0-10), but recognized that it was a painful procedure provoking anxiety, and that pain management could be improved. Results revealed the lack of a standardized approach to procedural pain management for BMA in this study sample. Assessing a patient's pain experience is a key component to identifying effective pain management for BMA.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Bone marrow aspiration (BMA) or biopsy is a necessary and frequent procedure for diagnosis and monitoring of hematological diseases. Pharmacological pain management approaches exist; however, previous experience and psychological preparation for BMA may impact pain perception.
AIMS
This study aimed to explore current practices in procedural pain management for BMA or biopsy.
DESIGN/SETTING/PARTICIPANTS
A cross-sectional internet-based survey was performed by the Nurses Group of the Italian Transplant Group (GITMO). Participants were nurses working in bone marrow transplant centers regularly performing BMA/biopsies.
RESULTS
Sixty out of 94 centers receiving the survey responded (63.8%), 47 adult and 13 pediatric centers. The majority of them (75%) provided only verbal information for patient preparation before BMA. . Injected local anesthetics were used in 55.4% of centers, and combined with topical anesthetics in 33.9% of centers. Use of oral anesthetics was rare; however, anxiolytics and benzodiazepines were occasionally used (18.3%, 18.3% respectively). All pediatric centers used deep sedation for the procedure (p < .001), but drug choice depended on anesthetist preference. Ice packs (35.0%) and oral analgesia as required (40.0%) were used for postprocedural pain. Nurses perceived their patients' pain scores as relatively low (3.5 on scale 0-10), but recognized that it was a painful procedure provoking anxiety, and that pain management could be improved.
CONCLUSIONS
Results revealed the lack of a standardized approach to procedural pain management for BMA in this study sample. Assessing a patient's pain experience is a key component to identifying effective pain management for BMA.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33109451
pii: S1524-9042(20)30194-6
doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2020.09.005
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

349-355

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 American Society for Pain Management Nursing. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Sarah J Liptrott (SJ)

IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

Stefano Botti (S)

Hematology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy. Electronic address: stefano.botti@ausl.re.it.

Francesca Bonifazi (F)

Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Marco Cioce (M)

Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

Valentina De Cecco (V)

Department of Onco-Haematology and Cell and Gene Therapy, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

Anna Rita Pesce (AR)

Ematologia Azienda Ospedaliera S.S. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy.

Alessandro Caime (A)

IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

Elena Rostagno (E)

Pediatric Oncology and Hematology Unit, University of Bologna Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy.

Emanuela Samarani (E)

BMT Unit, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy.

Letizia Galgano (L)

Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Firenze, Italy.

Fabio Ciceri (F)

Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.

Laura Orlando (L)

Istituto Oncologico della Svizzera Italiana, Bellinzona, Switzerland.

Gianpaolo Gargiulo (G)

Haematology Unit, Federico II University Hospital of Naples, Naples, Italy.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH