The diagnostic performance of CA125 for the detection of ovarian and non-ovarian cancer in primary care: A population-based cohort study.
Adult
Aged
Biomarkers, Tumor
/ blood
CA-125 Antigen
/ analysis
Cohort Studies
Early Detection of Cancer
/ methods
Female
Humans
Mass Screening
/ methods
Middle Aged
Neoplasms
/ diagnosis
Ovarian Neoplasms
/ blood
Population
Predictive Value of Tests
Primary Health Care
Sensitivity and Specificity
United Kingdom
Journal
PLoS medicine
ISSN: 1549-1676
Titre abrégé: PLoS Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101231360
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2020
10 2020
Historique:
received:
03
02
2020
accepted:
11
09
2020
entrez:
28
10
2020
pubmed:
29
10
2020
medline:
22
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The serum biomarker cancer antigen 125 (CA125) is widely used as an investigation for possible ovarian cancer in symptomatic women presenting to primary care. However, its diagnostic performance in this setting is unknown. We evaluated the performance of CA125 in primary care for the detection of ovarian and non-ovarian cancers. We studied women in the United Kingdom Clinical Practice Research Datalink with a CA125 test performed between 1 May 2011-31 December 2014. Ovarian and non-ovarian cancers diagnosed in the year following CA125 testing were identified from the cancer registry. Women were categorized by age: <50 years and ≥50 years. Conventional measures of test diagnostic accuracy, including sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value, were calculated for the standard CA125 cut-off (≥35 U/ml). The probability of a woman having cancer at each CA125 level between 1-1,000 U/ml was estimated using logistic regression. Cancer probability was also estimated on the basis of CA125 level and age in years using logistic regression. We identified CA125 levels equating to a 3% estimated cancer probability: the "risk threshold" at which the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence advocates urgent specialist cancer investigation. A total of 50,780 women underwent CA125 testing; 456 (0.9%) were diagnosed with ovarian cancer and 1,321 (2.6%) with non-ovarian cancer. Of women with a CA125 level ≥35 U/ml, 3.4% aged <50 years and 15.2% aged ≥50 years had ovarian cancer. Of women with a CA125 level ≥35 U/ml who were aged ≥50 years and who did not have ovarian cancer, 20.4% were diagnosed with a non-ovarian cancer. A CA125 value of 53 U/ml equated to a 3% probability of ovarian cancer overall. This varied by age, with a value of 104 U/ml in 40-year-old women and 32 U/ml in 70-year-old women equating to a 3% probability. The main limitations of our study were that we were unable to determine why CA125 tests were performed and that our findings are based solely on UK primary care data, so caution is need in extrapolating them to other healthcare settings. CA125 is a useful test for ovarian cancer detection in primary care, particularly in women ≥50 years old. Clinicians should also consider non-ovarian cancers in women with high CA125 levels, especially if ovarian cancer has been excluded, in order to prevent diagnostic delay. Our results enable clinicians and patients to determine the estimated probability of ovarian cancer and all cancers at any CA125 level and age, which can be used to guide individual decisions on the need for further investigation or referral.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The serum biomarker cancer antigen 125 (CA125) is widely used as an investigation for possible ovarian cancer in symptomatic women presenting to primary care. However, its diagnostic performance in this setting is unknown. We evaluated the performance of CA125 in primary care for the detection of ovarian and non-ovarian cancers.
METHODS AND FINDINGS
We studied women in the United Kingdom Clinical Practice Research Datalink with a CA125 test performed between 1 May 2011-31 December 2014. Ovarian and non-ovarian cancers diagnosed in the year following CA125 testing were identified from the cancer registry. Women were categorized by age: <50 years and ≥50 years. Conventional measures of test diagnostic accuracy, including sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value, were calculated for the standard CA125 cut-off (≥35 U/ml). The probability of a woman having cancer at each CA125 level between 1-1,000 U/ml was estimated using logistic regression. Cancer probability was also estimated on the basis of CA125 level and age in years using logistic regression. We identified CA125 levels equating to a 3% estimated cancer probability: the "risk threshold" at which the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence advocates urgent specialist cancer investigation. A total of 50,780 women underwent CA125 testing; 456 (0.9%) were diagnosed with ovarian cancer and 1,321 (2.6%) with non-ovarian cancer. Of women with a CA125 level ≥35 U/ml, 3.4% aged <50 years and 15.2% aged ≥50 years had ovarian cancer. Of women with a CA125 level ≥35 U/ml who were aged ≥50 years and who did not have ovarian cancer, 20.4% were diagnosed with a non-ovarian cancer. A CA125 value of 53 U/ml equated to a 3% probability of ovarian cancer overall. This varied by age, with a value of 104 U/ml in 40-year-old women and 32 U/ml in 70-year-old women equating to a 3% probability. The main limitations of our study were that we were unable to determine why CA125 tests were performed and that our findings are based solely on UK primary care data, so caution is need in extrapolating them to other healthcare settings.
CONCLUSIONS
CA125 is a useful test for ovarian cancer detection in primary care, particularly in women ≥50 years old. Clinicians should also consider non-ovarian cancers in women with high CA125 levels, especially if ovarian cancer has been excluded, in order to prevent diagnostic delay. Our results enable clinicians and patients to determine the estimated probability of ovarian cancer and all cancers at any CA125 level and age, which can be used to guide individual decisions on the need for further investigation or referral.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33112854
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003295
pii: PMEDICINE-D-20-00302
pmc: PMC7592785
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
CA-125 Antigen
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e1003295Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : NIHR-CS-012-009
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : FR17 424
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : C8640/A23385
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : IS-BRC-1215-20007
Pays : United Kingdom
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Oncologist. 2012;17(12):1515-33
pubmed: 23024155
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jun 1;29(16):2253-8
pubmed: 21537035
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Mar;13(3):285-91
pubmed: 22257524
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jun 20;33(18):2062-71
pubmed: 25964255
Hum Reprod. 1989 Jan;4(1):1-12
pubmed: 2651469
Eur J Epidemiol. 2019 Jan;34(1):91-99
pubmed: 30219957
Gynecol Oncol. 2002 Apr;85(1):175-8
pubmed: 11925140
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2001 May;10(5):489-93
pubmed: 11352859
BMC Cancer. 2019 Nov 1;19(1):1028
pubmed: 31676000
BMJ. 2009 Aug 25;339:b2998
pubmed: 19706933
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Nov;193(5):1630-9
pubmed: 16260202
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424
pubmed: 30207593
BMJ Open. 2016 May 13;6(5):e011664
pubmed: 27178981
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009 Feb;142(2):99-105
pubmed: 18995946
BMJ. 2015 Oct 28;351:h5527
pubmed: 26511519
PLoS Med. 2015 Oct 06;12(10):e1001885
pubmed: 26440803
BMJ. 2016 Jun 22;353:i3139
pubmed: 27334281
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Jun;44(3):827-36
pubmed: 26050254
N Engl J Med. 1983 Oct 13;309(15):883-7
pubmed: 6310399
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jun 28;20(24):7864-77
pubmed: 24976723
Br J Cancer. 2019 May;120(11):1045-1051
pubmed: 31015558
N Engl J Med. 2013 Sep 5;369(10):920-31
pubmed: 24004119
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2005 Sep-Oct;15(5):679-91
pubmed: 16174214
Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Sep;130(3):674-81
pubmed: 23822892
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014 Jan;124(1):1-5
pubmed: 24219974
Fam Pract. 2018 Mar 27;35(2):199-202
pubmed: 29029123
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Feb;15(2):232-40
pubmed: 24433682
Br J Cancer. 2014 Feb 4;110(3):584-92
pubmed: 24366304
BMJ Open. 2016 Aug 09;6(8):e010333
pubmed: 27507231
Radiology. 1999 Jul;212(1):19-27
pubmed: 10405715