Prevalence and Predictors of Postpartum Depression Among Male Partners Who Came to Postnatal Follow-up Clinic with Their Partner in Selected Public Health Centers of Wolaita Zone, Ethiopia, 2019.
Edinburgh postnatal depression scale
parenthood
paternal postpartum depression
Journal
Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment
ISSN: 1176-6328
Titre abrégé: Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101240304
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
20
07
2020
accepted:
08
09
2020
entrez:
29
10
2020
pubmed:
30
10
2020
medline:
30
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Paternal postpartum depression is a serious public health problem which has a significant effect on mortality and morbidity level. Its effect is not limited to the partner, but it also affects the family, the marital relationship and development of the child. Therefore, this study was planned to assess the prevalence and predictors of paternal postpartum depression among accompanying partners in selected public health centers of Wolaita Zone, Ethiopia. An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 423 male partners. The study was conducted in 25 randomly selected health centers and samples proportionally allocated to each health center. Finally, the study participants were selected by systematic random sampling method. The collected data were entered into EpiData version 4.2.0 and exported to IBM SPSS for further analysis. The Edinburgh postnatal depression scale was considered at a cutoff point ≥10 to detect depression. Descriptive and binary logistic regression analyses were done. Adjusted odds ratio (AOR) and Four hundred and ten partners participated in this study making a response rate of 97%. Seventy (17%) of the participants had paternal postpartum depression. Family income (AOR=3.0; 95%CI: 1.1-8.2), substance use (AOR=4.5; 95%CI: 1.5-13.3), family support (AOR=3.9; 95%CI: 1.3-11.3), marital relation (AOR=4.1; 95%CI: 1.5-11.0), unplanned pregnancy (AOR=3.5; 95%CI: 1.4-8.7) and infant sleeping problems (AOR=10.0; 95%CI: 4.1-24.0) were variables significantly associated with paternal postnatal depression.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Paternal postpartum depression is a serious public health problem which has a significant effect on mortality and morbidity level. Its effect is not limited to the partner, but it also affects the family, the marital relationship and development of the child. Therefore, this study was planned to assess the prevalence and predictors of paternal postpartum depression among accompanying partners in selected public health centers of Wolaita Zone, Ethiopia.
METHODOLOGY
METHODS
An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 423 male partners. The study was conducted in 25 randomly selected health centers and samples proportionally allocated to each health center. Finally, the study participants were selected by systematic random sampling method. The collected data were entered into EpiData version 4.2.0 and exported to IBM SPSS for further analysis. The Edinburgh postnatal depression scale was considered at a cutoff point ≥10 to detect depression. Descriptive and binary logistic regression analyses were done. Adjusted odds ratio (AOR) and
RESULTS
RESULTS
Four hundred and ten partners participated in this study making a response rate of 97%. Seventy (17%) of the participants had paternal postpartum depression. Family income (AOR=3.0; 95%CI: 1.1-8.2), substance use (AOR=4.5; 95%CI: 1.5-13.3), family support (AOR=3.9; 95%CI: 1.3-11.3), marital relation (AOR=4.1; 95%CI: 1.5-11.0), unplanned pregnancy (AOR=3.5; 95%CI: 1.4-8.7) and infant sleeping problems (AOR=10.0; 95%CI: 4.1-24.0) were variables significantly associated with paternal postnatal depression.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33116529
doi: 10.2147/NDT.S273045
pii: 273045
pmc: PMC7549131
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Retracted Publication
Langues
eng
Pagination
2307-2316Commentaires et corrections
Type : RetractionIn
Informations de copyright
© 2020 Markos and Arba.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work. Authors received no funding for this study.
Références
Pediatrics. 2006 Aug;118(2):659-68
pubmed: 16882821
Midwifery. 2016 Apr;35:47-52
pubmed: 27060400
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2004 Jul-Aug;33(4):410-20
pubmed: 15346666
Nord J Psychiatry. 2013 Dec;67(6):407-13
pubmed: 23286693
Res Nurs Health. 2016 Aug;39(4):253-62
pubmed: 27209152
Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2018 Aug 31;14:196-206
pubmed: 30258485
J Affect Disord. 2013 Aug 15;150(1):44-9
pubmed: 23489392
Am J Mens Health. 2019 Jan-Feb;13(1):1557988319831219
pubmed: 30776946
Br J Dev Psychol. 2005 Nov;23(4):609-21
pubmed: 21214600
Midwifery. 2006 Jun;22(2):169-80
pubmed: 16356610
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2007 Sep;41(9):718-25
pubmed: 17687657
Br J Psychiatry. 1987 Jun;150:782-6
pubmed: 3651732
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2005 May;46(5):479-89
pubmed: 15845128
Child Abuse Negl. 2017 Aug;70:231-239
pubmed: 28633058
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Aug;33(16):2797-2804
pubmed: 30563402
Midwifery. 2018 Jan;56:121-127
pubmed: 29096280
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2006 Mar;113(3):230-2
pubmed: 16466407
J Affect Disord. 2016 Dec;206:189-203
pubmed: 27475890
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2013;9:379-407
pubmed: 23394227
Lancet. 2004 Jan 24;363(9405):303-10
pubmed: 14751705
Nurs Health Sci. 2010 Jun;12(2):170-6
pubmed: 20602688
Pediatrics. 2013 Feb;131(2):e463-9
pubmed: 23296445
J Pediatr Health Care. 2013 Nov-Dec;27(6):479-85
pubmed: 23182851
Dev Psychol. 2004 Nov;40(6):1133-47
pubmed: 15535762
Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol. 2015 May 14;1:12
pubmed: 27057329
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2013 Apr;48(4):563-73
pubmed: 22898826
J Affect Disord. 2011 May;130(3):358-77
pubmed: 20599275
Contemp Nurse. 2010 Feb-Mar;34(2):199-210
pubmed: 20509804
J Affect Disord. 2011 Jul;132(1-2):243-6
pubmed: 21277023
BMC Res Notes. 2018 Aug 29;11(1):623
pubmed: 30157909
Lancet. 2005 Jun 25-Jul 1;365(9478):2158-9
pubmed: 15978909