Community Perception Regarding Maternity Service Provision in Public Health Institutions in 2018 and 2019: A Qualitative Study.
attitude
maternal health
maternity service
perception
qualitative
Journal
International journal of women's health
ISSN: 1179-1411
Titre abrégé: Int J Womens Health
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101531698
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
16
02
2020
accepted:
02
09
2020
entrez:
29
10
2020
pubmed:
30
10
2020
medline:
30
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In the perspective of health care, community perception is defined as a combination of experiences, expectations and perceived needs. The community and client's perception of health services seem to have been largely ignored by health-care providers in developing countries. There is a knowledge gap about communities' perception and perspective of maternal health. If the community's perception is known, the quality of maternity care may be improved, maternal morbidity and mortality could be decreased, and the overall health of the mother can be improved. The aim of this study was to explore community's perception of maternity service provision in public health institutions. A qualitative study with the underpinning philosophy of phenomenology was conducted in five subcities of Mekelle city, Ethiopia. Focus group discussions (FGDs) and in-depth interviews (IDSs) with participants who are residing in Mekelle city and who experienced maternity service as a client or as attendants were conducted to collect the necessary information. Using a semi-structured tool that has been translated into the local language, collected data were analyzed thematically using computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software ATLAS version 7. Qualitative data were transcribed through replaying the tape recorded interview from IDIs and FGDs. The text was carefully read and similar ideas were organized together. The participant's inductive meanings were extracted verbatim and described in narratives. The researcher and research assistants independently transcribed participant's comments verbatim to confirm the reliability of the findings. Participants reported that maternal health services in public health institutions were negative. Participants described experiencing poor staff attitude, lack of prescribed drugs in the institutional pharmacies, long waiting time, family proximity by professionals, poor attention to women during labor, lack of privacy and mistreatment made them develop a negative perception towards public health institutions. Despite these complaints, participants acknowledged public health facilities for affordable, accessible, qualified personnel and usually stocked with quality medications and equipment. This study revealed that the community has a negative perception of the maternal health services in the public health institutions. The main reasons for their negative perception were poor staff attitude, unavailability of prescribed drugs in the institutional pharmacies, long waiting time, family proximity by professionals, poor attention to women during labor, lack of privacy and mistreatment.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
In the perspective of health care, community perception is defined as a combination of experiences, expectations and perceived needs. The community and client's perception of health services seem to have been largely ignored by health-care providers in developing countries. There is a knowledge gap about communities' perception and perspective of maternal health. If the community's perception is known, the quality of maternity care may be improved, maternal morbidity and mortality could be decreased, and the overall health of the mother can be improved. The aim of this study was to explore community's perception of maternity service provision in public health institutions.
METHODS
METHODS
A qualitative study with the underpinning philosophy of phenomenology was conducted in five subcities of Mekelle city, Ethiopia. Focus group discussions (FGDs) and in-depth interviews (IDSs) with participants who are residing in Mekelle city and who experienced maternity service as a client or as attendants were conducted to collect the necessary information. Using a semi-structured tool that has been translated into the local language, collected data were analyzed thematically using computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software ATLAS version 7. Qualitative data were transcribed through replaying the tape recorded interview from IDIs and FGDs. The text was carefully read and similar ideas were organized together. The participant's inductive meanings were extracted verbatim and described in narratives. The researcher and research assistants independently transcribed participant's comments verbatim to confirm the reliability of the findings.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Participants reported that maternal health services in public health institutions were negative. Participants described experiencing poor staff attitude, lack of prescribed drugs in the institutional pharmacies, long waiting time, family proximity by professionals, poor attention to women during labor, lack of privacy and mistreatment made them develop a negative perception towards public health institutions. Despite these complaints, participants acknowledged public health facilities for affordable, accessible, qualified personnel and usually stocked with quality medications and equipment.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
This study revealed that the community has a negative perception of the maternal health services in the public health institutions. The main reasons for their negative perception were poor staff attitude, unavailability of prescribed drugs in the institutional pharmacies, long waiting time, family proximity by professionals, poor attention to women during labor, lack of privacy and mistreatment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33116927
doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S250044
pii: 250044
pmc: PMC7547801
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
773-783Informations de copyright
© 2020 Girma et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors report no conflicts of interests in this work.
Références
Int J Womens Health. 2018 Jan 09;10:25-34
pubmed: 29386917
Reprod Health. 2017 Mar 16;14(1):44
pubmed: 28302182
Med Educ Online. 2012;17:17172
pubmed: 22509091
Trop Med Int Health. 2007 Nov;12(11):1279-87
pubmed: 17956542
Pan Afr Med J. 2014 Jan 31;17:76
pubmed: 25018826
Curr Med Res Opin. 2013 Nov;29(11):1475-82
pubmed: 23998506
Ethiop J Health Sci. 2013 Jul;23(2):158-64
pubmed: 23950632
Health Policy Plan. 2018 Jan 1;33(1):1-8
pubmed: 29036530
Soc Sci Med. 1995 Apr;40(7):903-18
pubmed: 7792630
BMC Med Educ. 2012 Mar 22;12:13
pubmed: 22439893
Reprod Health. 2018 May 2;15(1):73
pubmed: 29720201
Lancet. 2016 Nov 5;388(10057):2307-2320
pubmed: 27642018
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Oct 4;18(1):392
pubmed: 30286734
Curationis. 2005 May;28(2):13-21
pubmed: 16045107
J Community Health Nurs. 2014;31(2):118-29
pubmed: 24788049
Ethiop J Health Sci. 2011 Jul;21(2):101-9
pubmed: 24776780
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Dec 21;14:425
pubmed: 25527872
Int J Qual Health Care. 2006 Oct;18(5):359-64
pubmed: 16931825
Soc Sci Med. 2001 May;52(9):1359-70
pubmed: 11286361
Afr J Reprod Health. 2008 Aug;12(2):120-31
pubmed: 20695047
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Apr 18;15:97
pubmed: 25928085