Red blood cells membrane micropolarity as a novel diagnostic indicator of type 1 and type 2 diabetes.
DMPC, dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine
DPPC, dipalmitoilphosphatidylcholine
Diabetes mellitus
Fluorescence lifetime microscopy
HDL, high-density lipoproteins
HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol
HbA1c, glycated Haemoglobin
LDL, low-density lipoproteins
LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
Membrane micropolarity
Metabolic imaging
PC, phosphatydilcholine
Personalized medicine
RBC, red blood cells
Red blood cells
T1DM, Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
T2DM, Type 2 diabetes Mellitus
Journal
Analytica chimica acta: X
ISSN: 2590-1346
Titre abrégé: Anal Chim Acta X
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101772417
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2019
Nov 2019
Historique:
received:
06
09
2019
revised:
09
10
2019
accepted:
10
10
2019
entrez:
29
10
2020
pubmed:
30
10
2020
medline:
30
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Classification of the category of diabetes is extremely important for clinicians to diagnose and select the correct treatment plan. Glycosylation, oxidation and other post-translational modifications of membrane and transmembrane proteins, as well as impairment in cholesterol homeostasis, can alter lipid density, packing, and interactions of Red blood cells (RBC) plasma membranes in type 1 and type 2 diabetes, thus varying their membrane micropolarity. This can be estimated, at a submicrometric scale, by determining the membrane relative permittivity, which is the factor by which the electric field between the charges is decreased relative to vacuum. Here, we employed a membrane micropolarity sensitive probe to monitor variations in red blood cells of healthy subjects (n=16) and patients affected by type 1 (T1DM, n=10) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM, n=24) to provide a cost-effective and supplementary indicator for diabetes classification. We find a less polar membrane microenvironment in T2DM patients, and a more polar membrane microenvironment in T1DM patients compared to control healthy patients. The differences in micropolarity are statistically significant among the three groups (p<0.01). The role of serum cholesterol pool in determining these differences was investigated, and other factors potentially altering the response of the probe were considered in view of developing a clinical assay based on RBC membrane micropolarity. These preliminary data pave the way for the development of an innovative assay which could become a tool for diagnosis and progression monitoring of type 1 and type 2 diabetes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33117983
doi: 10.1016/j.acax.2019.100030
pii: S2590-1346(19)30026-X
pmc: PMC7587021
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100030Informations de copyright
© 2019 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
Biophys J. 2018 Oct 16;115(8):1498-1508
pubmed: 30269886
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 23;7(1):9215
pubmed: 28835608
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2018 Aug;162:263-271
pubmed: 29903493
Biophys J. 2000 Mar;78(3):1376-89
pubmed: 10692323
Biophys J. 2008 Jan 15;94(2):L14-6
pubmed: 17981902
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009 Jan;1788(1):97-121
pubmed: 18823938
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014 Jul;1840(7):2192-202
pubmed: 24735797
J Lipid Res. 1967 Jul;8(4):374-9
pubmed: 6033604
J Lipid Res. 1968 Mar;9(2):155-67
pubmed: 4868699
Biophys J. 1999 Mar;76(3):1228-40
pubmed: 10049307
J Am Heart Assoc. 2012 Aug;1(4):e001826
pubmed: 23130164
Biochemistry. 1979 Jul 10;18(14):3075-8
pubmed: 465454
Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2011 Sep;9(5):533-71
pubmed: 21595628
Biochimie. 2006 May;88(5):449-60
pubmed: 16356621
Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Biol Lipids. 2018 Jul;1863(7):783-793
pubmed: 29654826
Biophys J. 2013 Mar 19;104(6):1238-47
pubmed: 23528083
Langmuir. 2006 Oct 10;22(21):8741-9
pubmed: 17014112
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2016 Jan 1;310(1):E1-E14
pubmed: 26530157
Lancet. 2017 Jun 3;389(10085):2239-2251
pubmed: 28190580
Biophys J. 2007 May 15;92(10):3346-57
pubmed: 17293396
MethodsX. 2018 Oct 29;5:1399-1412
pubmed: 30456174
J Supramol Struct. 1978;8(4):413-30
pubmed: 723275
Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab. 2009 Mar;5(3):150-9
pubmed: 19229235
Diabetes Care. 2009 Jan;32 Suppl 1:S62-7
pubmed: 19118289
Diabetes Metab. 2009 Nov;35(5):353-60
pubmed: 19733492
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1983 Feb 9;728(1):121-8
pubmed: 6687553
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015 Sep;1848(9):1908-26
pubmed: 26004840
Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1951 Oct;78(1):329-32
pubmed: 14892010
J Fluoresc. 2005 Nov;15(6):883-94
pubmed: 16328702
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 7;12(9):e0184109
pubmed: 28880900
Free Radic Res. 2016 Nov;50(sup1):S40-S50
pubmed: 27593084
Biophys J. 2000 Jan;78(1):290-305
pubmed: 10620293
Autophagy. 2015;11(10):1905-16
pubmed: 26506895
J Biol Chem. 1996 Jan 26;271(4):2023-8
pubmed: 8567654
J Biophotonics. 2014 Aug;7(8):589-96
pubmed: 23576407
J Biol Chem. 2014 Aug 29;289(35):24020-9
pubmed: 25074931
Opt Express. 2012 Jun 4;20(12):12729-41
pubmed: 22714302