Effect of Vocimagene Amiretrorepvec in Combination With Flucytosine vs Standard of Care on Survival Following Tumor Resection in Patients With Recurrent High-Grade Glioma: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Aged
Antineoplastic Agents
/ administration & dosage
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ administration & dosage
Bevacizumab
/ administration & dosage
Brain Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Cytosine Deaminase
/ administration & dosage
Female
Flucytosine
/ administration & dosage
Glioma
/ drug therapy
Humans
Isocitrate Dehydrogenase
/ genetics
Lomustine
/ administration & dosage
Male
Middle Aged
Recombinant Proteins
/ administration & dosage
Standard of Care
Survival Analysis
Temozolomide
/ administration & dosage
Treatment Outcome
Journal
JAMA oncology
ISSN: 2374-2445
Titre abrégé: JAMA Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101652861
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 12 2020
01 12 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
30
10
2020
medline:
12
2
2021
entrez:
29
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
New treatments are needed to improve the prognosis of patients with recurrent high-grade glioma. To compare overall survival for patients receiving tumor resection followed by vocimagene amiretrorepvec (Toca 511) with flucytosine (Toca FC) vs standard of care (SOC). A randomized, open-label phase 2/3 trial (TOCA 5) in 58 centers in the US, Canada, Israel, and South Korea, comparing posttumor resection treatment with Toca 511 followed by Toca FC vs a defined single choice of approved (SOC) therapies was conducted from November 30, 2015, to December 20, 2019. Patients received tumor resection for first or second recurrence of glioblastoma or anaplastic astrocytoma. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive Toca 511/FC (n = 201) or SOC control (n = 202). For the Toca 511/FC group, patients received Toca 511 injected into the resection cavity wall at the time of surgery, followed by cycles of oral Toca FC 6 weeks after surgery. For the SOC control group, patients received investigators' choice of single therapy: lomustine, temozolomide, or bevacizumab. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) in time from randomization date to death due to any cause. Secondary outcomes reported in this study included safety, durable response rate (DRR), duration of DRR, durable clinical benefit rate, OS and DRR by IDH1 variant status, and 12-month OS. All 403 randomized patients (median [SD] age: 56 [11.46] years; 62.5% [252] men) were included in the efficacy analysis, and 400 patients were included in the safety analysis (3 patients on the SOC group did not receive resection). Final analysis included 271 deaths (141 deaths in the Toca 511/FC group and 130 deaths in the SOC control group). The median follow-up was 22.8 months. The median OS was 11.10 months for the Toca 511/FC group and 12.22 months for the control group (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% CI 0.83, 1.35; P = .62). The secondary end points did not demonstrate statistically significant differences. The rates of adverse events were similar in the Toca 511/FC group and the SOC control group. Among patients who underwent tumor resection for first or second recurrence of glioblastoma or anaplastic astrocytoma, administration of Toca 511 and Toca FC, compared with SOC, did not improve overall survival or other efficacy end points. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02414165.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33119048
pii: 2772174
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.3161
pmc: PMC7596685
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antineoplastic Agents
0
Recombinant Proteins
0
Bevacizumab
2S9ZZM9Q9V
Lomustine
7BRF0Z81KG
Flucytosine
D83282DT06
vocimagene amiretrorepvec
DC4WO3WA4Q
Isocitrate Dehydrogenase
EC 1.1.1.41
IDH1 protein, human
EC 1.1.1.42.
Cytosine Deaminase
EC 3.5.4.1
Temozolomide
YF1K15M17Y
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02414165']
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1939-1946Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P50 CA211015
Pays : United States
Références
Neuro Oncol. 2020 May 15;22(5):684-693
pubmed: 31747009
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Jul 1;6(7):1003-1010
pubmed: 32437507
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Aug;15(9):943-53
pubmed: 25035291
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Sep 10;31(26):3212-8
pubmed: 23940216
Neuro Oncol. 2007 Jan;9(1):29-38
pubmed: 17108063
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Sep 1;23(17):4959-4969
pubmed: 28864724
Neuro Oncol. 2020 May 15;22(5):705-717
pubmed: 31844890
Neuro Oncol. 2018 Sep 3;20(10):1383-1392
pubmed: 29762717
Cancer Sci. 2012 Feb;103(2):269-73
pubmed: 22034964
Neuro Oncol. 2011 Oct;13(10):1118-24
pubmed: 21813511
CNS Oncol. 2016 Jul;5(3):145-57
pubmed: 27230974
Neuro Oncol. 2012 Feb;14(2):145-59
pubmed: 22070930
N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 10;352(10):987-96
pubmed: 15758009
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Apr 20;28(12):2051-7
pubmed: 20308655
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 1;28(7):1168-74
pubmed: 20124186
Neurology. 2010 Oct 26;75(17):1560-6
pubmed: 20975057
Neuro Oncol. 2017 Jul 1;19(7):930-939
pubmed: 28387849
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Oct 1;24(19):4680-4693
pubmed: 29945998
Sci Transl Med. 2016 Jun 1;8(341):341ra75
pubmed: 27252174
Neuro Oncol. 2017 Feb 1;19(2):252-258
pubmed: 27994066
Neurosurg Focus. 2006 Apr 15;20(4):E19
pubmed: 16709025