Histology results of systematic prostate biopsies by in-bore magnetic resonance imaging vs. transrectal ultrasound.
Journal
Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada
ISSN: 1911-6470
Titre abrégé: Can Urol Assoc J
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101312644
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2021
May 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
30
10
2020
medline:
30
10
2020
entrez:
29
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We aimed to compare systematic biopsies (SBs) of in-bore magnetic resonance-guided prostate biopsy (MRGpB) with those performed under transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guidance in the clinical setting. Data on all 161 consecutive patients undergoing prostate biopsy at our institution between November 2017 and July 2019 were retrospectively collected. The patients were referred to biopsy due to elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and/or abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE) and/or at least one Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) lesion score of ≥3 on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). We included patients with PSA levels ≤20 ng/ml and those with 8-12 core biopsies. Histology results of SBs performed by in-bore MRGpB were compared to TRUS SBs. Chi-squared, Fischer's exact, and multivariate Pearson regression tests were used for statistical analysis (SPSS, IBM Corporation). In total, 128 patients were eligible for analysis. Their median age was 68 years (interquartile range [IQR] 61.5-72), mean prostate size 55±29 cc, and mean PSA and PSA density levels 7.6±3.5 ng/ml and 0.18±0.13 ng/ml/cc, respectively. Thirty-five patients (27.3%) had suspicious DRE findings. Both biopsy groups were similar for these parameters. Thirty-eight (62.3%) MRGpB patients had a previous biopsy vs. five (7.1%) TRUS-SB patients (p<0.0001). The number of patients diagnosed with clinically significant and non-significant disease was similar for both groups. High-risk disease was more prevalent in the TRUS-SB group (22.4% vs. 4.9%, p<0.01). Our data suggest that in-bore MRGpB is no better than TRUS for guiding SBs for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33119495
pii: cuaj.6607
doi: 10.5489/cuaj.6607
pmc: PMC8095281
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
E244-E247Références
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Feb;196(2):374-81
pubmed: 21257890
Eur Urol Oncol. 2020 Feb;3(1):112-118
pubmed: 31411973
JAMA Surg. 2019 Sep 1;154(9):811-818
pubmed: 31188412
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 10;378(19):1767-1777
pubmed: 29552975
Eur Urol. 2015 Sep;68(3):438-50
pubmed: 25480312
JAMA. 2015 Jan 27;313(4):390-7
pubmed: 25626035
Eur Urol Oncol. 2019 Jul;2(4):397-404
pubmed: 31277776
Urology. 2010 May;75(5):1034-9
pubmed: 20080294
Prostate Cancer. 2013;2013:705865
pubmed: 23533779
J Urol. 2019 Nov;202(5):944-951
pubmed: 31144593
Lancet. 2017 Feb 25;389(10071):815-822
pubmed: 28110982
Eur Radiol. 2006 Apr;16(4):927-38
pubmed: 16391907
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Jan;20(1):100-109
pubmed: 30470502
Eur Urol. 2002 Aug;42(2):93-103
pubmed: 12160578
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2016 May;14(5):509-19
pubmed: 27160230
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Aug;42(2):460-7
pubmed: 25469909
Urology. 2012 Jan;79(1):37-42
pubmed: 22055691
Eur Urol. 2016 Jan;69(1):149-56
pubmed: 25862143
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2017 Jun;15(3):417-427
pubmed: 28258961