Learnings from conducting mental health research during 2004 tsunami in Tamil Nadu, India.
Crisis response
Disaster management
Disaster psychology
Evaluation
LMICs
Mental illness
Research
Tsunami
Journal
BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 Oct 2020
29 Oct 2020
Historique:
received:
17
02
2020
accepted:
20
10
2020
entrez:
30
10
2020
pubmed:
31
10
2020
medline:
15
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The Indian Ocean tsunami experience in 2004 caused a major loss of life and subsequent emotional trauma for survivors. Psychosocial needs in the aftermath of this disaster were extensive, yet the cohesion and effectiveness of response were limited due to lack of preparedness and relevant policy. The Schizophrenia Research Foundation (SCARF) was one of the organizations that quickly responded to provide psychosocial assistance to people in the tsunami affected areas and recognized a need for relevant research on disaster response. Therefore, we undertook research on the challenges, success and limitations of psychosocial interventions in alleviating post-traumatic symptomology. Both community-level workers and researchers were limited in their preparedness to carry out tasks related to response. Language barriers, cultural differences, and a gap in long-term services limited the breadth and scope of research that was able to be completed. Lack of policy, poor co-ordination of services, lack of trained researchers and limited resources were challenges that emerged during this period and various strategies were adopted to meet these challenges. Continued research and evaluation of data has brought crucial considerations to light, including the variance in symptomology, effective tools of measurement, and the nuanced response of survivors. Future research should take relevant factors into consideration including barriers to care. Understanding of the local language and religious beliefs are significant resources in understanding the nature of survivors' trauma response and effective means of coping. Lastly, limitations regarding time frame and scope of research should be evaluated to provide more effective, comprehensive methods in future studies.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The Indian Ocean tsunami experience in 2004 caused a major loss of life and subsequent emotional trauma for survivors. Psychosocial needs in the aftermath of this disaster were extensive, yet the cohesion and effectiveness of response were limited due to lack of preparedness and relevant policy. The Schizophrenia Research Foundation (SCARF) was one of the organizations that quickly responded to provide psychosocial assistance to people in the tsunami affected areas and recognized a need for relevant research on disaster response. Therefore, we undertook research on the challenges, success and limitations of psychosocial interventions in alleviating post-traumatic symptomology.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
Both community-level workers and researchers were limited in their preparedness to carry out tasks related to response. Language barriers, cultural differences, and a gap in long-term services limited the breadth and scope of research that was able to be completed. Lack of policy, poor co-ordination of services, lack of trained researchers and limited resources were challenges that emerged during this period and various strategies were adopted to meet these challenges.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Continued research and evaluation of data has brought crucial considerations to light, including the variance in symptomology, effective tools of measurement, and the nuanced response of survivors. Future research should take relevant factors into consideration including barriers to care. Understanding of the local language and religious beliefs are significant resources in understanding the nature of survivors' trauma response and effective means of coping. Lastly, limitations regarding time frame and scope of research should be evaluated to provide more effective, comprehensive methods in future studies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33121446
doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09733-y
pii: 10.1186/s12889-020-09733-y
pmc: PMC7594993
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1627Références
Bull World Health Organ. 2012 Nov 1;90(11):813-21
pubmed: 23226893
Indian J Psychiatry. 2017 Jan-Mar;59(1):21-26
pubmed: 28529357
Science. 1993 Dec 10;262(5140):1666-7
pubmed: 17781784
World Psychiatry. 2013 Feb;12(1):84
pubmed: 23471809
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2009;22(3):193-202
pubmed: 19819837
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2008 May;54(3):197-205
pubmed: 18575375
Lancet. 2011 Nov 5;378(9803):1654-63
pubmed: 22008420
Ind Psychiatry J. 2016 Jul-Dec;25(2):131-134
pubmed: 28659690
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2006 Jun;18(3):225-31
pubmed: 16753659
Environ Health. 2005 May 10;4(1):6
pubmed: 15882472
Indian J Psychol Med. 2015 Jul-Sep;37(3):261-71
pubmed: 26664073
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Nov 11;4(6):e001870
pubmed: 31798999
J Clin Psychiatry. 2020 Apr 14;81(3):
pubmed: 32297717
Indian J Psychiatry. 2010 Jan;52(Suppl 1):S286-90
pubmed: 21836696
Science. 2004 Dec 3;306(5702):1670-1
pubmed: 15576583
Perm J. 2017;21:17-024
pubmed: 28898197
Ind Psychiatry J. 2014 Jul-Dec;23(2):86-93
pubmed: 25788796