Effect of the presence of the articular cartilage on the femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty in female and varus osteoarthritis knees.
Aged
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
/ methods
Bone Malalignment
/ diagnostic imaging
Cartilage, Articular
/ diagnostic imaging
Female
Femur
/ diagnostic imaging
Humans
Knee Joint
/ diagnostic imaging
Male
Middle Aged
Osteoarthritis, Knee
/ diagnostic imaging
Rotation
Sex Characteristics
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Articular cartilage
Cartilage thickness
Femoral rotation
Korean patients
Varus knee
Journal
Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research
ISSN: 1749-799X
Titre abrégé: J Orthop Surg Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101265112
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 Oct 2020
29 Oct 2020
Historique:
received:
25
05
2020
accepted:
20
10
2020
entrez:
30
10
2020
pubmed:
31
10
2020
medline:
3
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Surgical techniques for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) require femoral rotational corrections that alter the position of the surface of the posterior femoral joint especially in kinematic alignment. However, preoperative planning of TKA based on computed tomography (CT), without knowing the femoral cartilage thickness, may cause post-surgery failures in femoral rotation. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of posterior condyle cartilage thickness on rotational alignment in the femoral component. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were obtained for 139 male and 531 female osteoarthritis patients. The angles defined by the femoral posterior condylar axis (PCA) and the surgical transepicondylar axis (TEA) were evaluated with respect to the presence of cartilage. Additionally, these effects were evaluated with respect to patient gender and varus/valgus condition. In all patients, the angle between the TEA and PCA was significantly greater in the presence of cartilage than in the absence of cartilage. This result was also seen in female patients. However, there was no difference in the TEA/PCA angle in male patients based on the presence of cartilage. The TEA/PCA angle was significantly greater in the presence of cartilage than in the absence of cartilage in the female varus group. However, there were no differences in the TEA/PCA angle based on the presence of cartilage in the male varus/valgus and female valgus groups. Cartilage thickness in the posterior femoral condyle was significantly greater on the lateral side than on the medial side in all and male patients. However, there was no difference between the genders regarding cartilage thickness. Surgical planning for TKA based on CT does not consider articular cartilage and could lead to external malrotation of the femoral implant. Therefore, the effect of the remaining posterior condylar cartilage should be considered by surgeons to prevent over-rotation of the femoral component, especially in female varus knees.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33121532
doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-02030-9
pii: 10.1186/s13018-020-02030-9
pmc: PMC7597046
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
499Références
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Jul;(388):147-56
pubmed: 11451114
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985 Dec;67(9):1321-7
pubmed: 4077902
J Med Invest. 2017;64(1.2):24-29
pubmed: 28373624
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Apr;26(4):1145-1151
pubmed: 28401277
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Oct;87(10):2276-80
pubmed: 16203894
Orthopedics. 2017 May 1;40(3):188-190
pubmed: 28112787
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Nov;103(7):1047-1056
pubmed: 28864235
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993 Jan;(286):40-7
pubmed: 8425366
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995 Dec;(321):168-72
pubmed: 7497664
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Sep;462:137-42
pubmed: 17563704
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Apr;26(4):1117-1122
pubmed: 28184957
Knee. 2012 Jun;19(3):185-9
pubmed: 21398130
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998 Nov;(356):144-53
pubmed: 9917679
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012 Aug;20(8):1463-9
pubmed: 21979303
Surg Radiol Anat. 2016 Mar;38(2):203-11
pubmed: 26253858
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Nov;25(11):3576-3584
pubmed: 28770298
J Arthroplasty. 2001 Jun;16(4):493-7
pubmed: 11402414
J Arthroplasty. 2012 Jun;27(6):1155-8
pubmed: 22342129
J Arthroplasty. 2002 Jan;17(1):2-10
pubmed: 11805918
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Nov;(392):38-45
pubmed: 11716411
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 May;91(5):683-90
pubmed: 19407308
Acta Orthop. 2010 Jun;81(3):347-53
pubmed: 20450421
Knee. 2016 Dec;23(6):975-980
pubmed: 27817981
Acta Orthop Scand. 2004 Feb;75(1):74-7
pubmed: 15022812
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2002 May;10(3):194-7
pubmed: 12012038