Do residential localities matter? Revisiting preference heterogeneity and ranking of ecological attributes of an inland river basin.

Choice experiment Hei river basin Preference heterogeneity Ranking of attributes River ecosystem Willingness to pay

Journal

The Science of the total environment
ISSN: 1879-1026
Titre abrégé: Sci Total Environ
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0330500

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Apr 2021
Historique:
received: 20 06 2020
revised: 05 10 2020
accepted: 06 10 2020
pubmed: 31 10 2020
medline: 31 10 2020
entrez: 30 10 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Recognition of public preferences and the assessment of the river basin are valuable for efficient river basin management, and improvement in ecological attributes of river basin can provide considerable non-market benefits. Accordingly, the current study examines the heterogeneity in preferences and ranking of river ecosystem services amongst residents on the basis of their willingness to pay (WTP) to enhance these services. Given the different environmental and economic conditions of urban and rural residents in China, their views on ecological restoration differ. Various Likert scales were used to explore residents' perceptions and ranking of ecological attributes. Findings revealed that urban and rural residents care about water for their daily life, with the mean value of 2.08 and 2.10 and the lowest standard deviation of 1.63 and 1.59, respectively where the range of scale is '1 is the most important and 7 is the least important'. Agricultural and industrial water, weather management in Yangsha Lake, vegetation restoration, biodiversity conservation and downstream ecological protection were the next most imperative ecological attributes. Moreover, the results from random parameter logit (RPL) models show that river water quality has the highest marginal utility value, whereas recreational conditions have the lowest marginal utility value in all respondents' models. A considerable difference exists amongst urban and rural residents' WTP for improvements in ecological amenities. Amongst all households, lower basin residents prefer and value ecological attributes and are ready to pay whatever cost for restoration. Generally, urban residents have high implicit prices for most of river ecosystem attributes. Findings reveal that the policymakers should consider the existing preference heterogeneity when designing ecosystem payment plans and allocating resources.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33121777
pii: S0048-9697(20)36500-1
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142970
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

142970

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest I confirmed that no conflict of interest exists in the submission of this manuscript, and is approved by all authors for publication in your journal.

Auteurs

Imran Khan (I)

College of Economics & Management, Northwest A&F University, 3 Taicheng Road, Yangling 712100, China; Department of Economics, The Unversity of Haripur, Haripur 22620, Pakistan. Electronic address: imran@nwafu.edu.cn.

Hongdou Lei (H)

College of Economics & Management, Northwest A&F University, 3 Taicheng Road, Yangling 712100, China. Electronic address: leihongdou@nwafu.edu.cn.

Ihsan Muhammad (I)

Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Earth Surface System and Environment Carrying Capacity, College of Urban and Environmental Science, Northwest University, Xi'an 710127, China. Electronic address: ihsan@stumail.nwu.edu.cn.

Minjuan Zhao (M)

College of Economics & Management, Northwest A&F University, 3 Taicheng Road, Yangling 712100, China. Electronic address: minjuan.zhao@nwafu.edu.cn.

Classifications MeSH