Cognitive and physical impact of cognitive-motor dual-task training in cognitively impaired older adults: An overview.
Cognition
Cognitive impairment
Dementia
Dual-task training
Motor.
Journal
Neurophysiologie clinique = Clinical neurophysiology
ISSN: 1769-7131
Titre abrégé: Neurophysiol Clin
Pays: France
ID NLM: 8804532
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2020
Nov 2020
Historique:
received:
24
09
2020
revised:
12
10
2020
accepted:
12
10
2020
pubmed:
31
10
2020
medline:
16
9
2021
entrez:
30
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Ageing is associated with cognitive decline, ranging from normal to mild cognitive impairment or dementia. This leads to physical and cognitive impairments, which are risk factors for loss of autonomy. Therefore, cognitive and physical training are important for cognitively impaired older adults. The combination of both may represent an efficiency advantage. This overview aims to summarize the effectiveness of cognitive-motor dual-task (CMDT) interventions on cognitive, physical and dual-task functions in cognitively impaired older adults, as well as the safety, adherence, and retention of benefits of these interventions. We searched for systematic reviews or meta-analyses assessing the effects of CMDT interventions on cognitive or physical functions in older adults with mild cognitive impairment or dementia through eight databases (CDSR (Cochrane), MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ProQuest and SportDiscus). Two reviewers independently performed the selection, data extraction and risk of bias evaluation. Nine reviews were included in this overview. CMDT interventions were found to be more effective than active control groups on cognitive and physical functions in older adults with cognitive impairment, irrespective of intervention dose and modalities; no information on dual-task functions was available. Retention of benefits, adherence, need for supervision and safety are still unclear. These results should be interpreted with caution, considering the low average methodological quality of included reviews. Future intervention research should follow more rigorous methodological standards and focus on other forms of CMDT.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33121880
pii: S0987-7053(20)30120-9
doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2020.10.010
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
441-453Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.