MiR-100 is a predictor of endocrine responsiveness and prognosis in patients with operable luminal breast cancer.
endocrine therapy
luminal breast cancer
miR-100
prognosis
response prediction
Journal
ESMO open
ISSN: 2059-7029
Titre abrégé: ESMO Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101690685
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2020
10 2020
Historique:
received:
21
07
2020
revised:
14
09
2020
accepted:
16
09
2020
entrez:
30
10
2020
pubmed:
31
10
2020
medline:
19
8
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Overexpression of miR-100 in stem cells derived from basal-like breast cancers causes loss of stemness, induction of luminal breast cancer markers and response to endocrine therapy. We, therefore, explored miR-100 as a novel biomarker in patients with luminal breast cancer. miR-100 expression was studied in 90 patients with oestrogen-receptor-positive/human-epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer enrolled in a prospective study of endocrine therapy given either preoperatively, or for the treatment of de novo metastatic disease. Response was defined as a Ki67 ≤2.7% after 21±3 days of treatment. The prognostic role of miR-100 expression was evaluated in the Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium (METABRIC) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) breast cancer datasets. Additionally, we explored the correlation between miR-100 and the expression its targets reported as being associated with endocrine resistance. Finally, we evaluated whether a signature based on miR-100 and its target genes could predict the luminal A molecular subtype. Baseline miR-100 was significantly anticorrelated with baseline and post-treatment Ki67 (p<0.001 and 0.004, respectively), and independently associated with response to treatment (OR 3.329, p=0.047). In the METABRIC dataset, high expression of miR-100 identified women with luminal A tumours treated with adjuvant endocrine therapy with improved overall survival (HR 0.55, p<0.001). miR-100 was negatively correlated with PLK1, FOXA1, mTOR and IGF1R expression, potentially explaining its prognostic effect. Finally, a miR-100-based signature developed in patients enrolled in the prospective study outperformed Ki67 alone in predicting the luminal A phenotype. Our findings suggest that miR-100 should be further explored as a biomarker in patients with luminal breast cancer.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33122354
pii: S2059-7029(20)32720-4
doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2020-000937
pmc: PMC7597498
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 3-alpha
0
MIRN100 microRNA, human
0
MicroRNAs
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e000937Informations de copyright
© Author (s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: FM has received personal speaker’s fees from Roche, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Eli Lilly, Daiichi Sankyo, Astra Zeneca. EB is the recipient of a Ph.D. fellowship from the Department of Medical Sciences, University of Torino ('Dipartimenti di Eccellenza 2018–2022', Project no. D15D18000410001).
Références
J Cell Physiol. 2018 Nov;233(11):8538-8550
pubmed: 29923196
Int J Cancer. 2010 May 1;126(9):2036-48
pubmed: 19739117
Nature. 2000 Aug 17;406(6797):747-52
pubmed: 10963602
Int J Cancer. 2012 Jun 15;130(12):2857-66
pubmed: 21792889
Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Jul 1;25(13):3887-3895
pubmed: 30814109
Nat Rev Cancer. 2015 Jun;15(6):321-33
pubmed: 25998712
Endocrinology. 2005 Nov;146(11):4609-18
pubmed: 16037379
Nature. 2012 Apr 18;486(7403):346-52
pubmed: 22522925
Cancer Res. 2010 Jun 1;70(11):4666-75
pubmed: 20484036
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Oct 25;113(43):E6600-E6609
pubmed: 27791031
J Clin Med. 2019 Oct 11;8(10):
pubmed: 31614612
Cancer Res. 2015 Jan 15;75(2):405-14
pubmed: 25480943
Cancer Biomark. 2020 Aug 21;:
pubmed: 32894240
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Aug 17;97(16):1180-4
pubmed: 16106022
Clin Cancer Res. 2004 Dec 1;10(23):8059-67
pubmed: 15585641
Nature. 2012 Jan 04;481(7381):389-93
pubmed: 22217937
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jul 8;100(14):8418-23
pubmed: 12829800
Cell Physiol Biochem. 2015;37(6):2143-59
pubmed: 26606597
Lancet. 2015 Oct 3;386(10001):1341-1352
pubmed: 26211827
CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jan;70(1):7-30
pubmed: 31912902
J Pak Med Assoc. 2018 May;68(5):759-763
pubmed: 29885177
Ann Oncol. 2019 Oct 1;30(10):1541-1557
pubmed: 31373601
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 May 20;101(10):736-50
pubmed: 19436038
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Dec;160(3):439-446
pubmed: 27744485
Cancer Biomark. 2019;24(1):43-49
pubmed: 30530966
Oncotarget. 2015 Feb 10;6(4):2315-30
pubmed: 25537513
J Clin Invest. 2010 Jul;120(7):2406-13
pubmed: 20530877
Mol Cell. 2014 Mar 6;53(5):806-18
pubmed: 24582497
Onco Targets Ther. 2017 Jan 23;10:493-502
pubmed: 28176958
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Jan 17;99(2):167-70
pubmed: 17228000
Cell Biochem Funct. 2016 Apr;34(3):142-8
pubmed: 26916216
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Feb 18;21(4):
pubmed: 32085669
Oncotarget. 2014 Aug 15;5(15):6375-86
pubmed: 25071007
Cancer Res. 2009 Nov 1;69(21):8472-81
pubmed: 19843843