Angiographic control versus ischaemia-driven management of patients undergoing percutaneous revascularisation of the unprotected left main coronary artery with second-generation drug-eluting stents: rationale and design of the PULSE trial.
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Computed Tomography Angiography
Coronary Angiography
Coronary Artery Disease
/ diagnostic imaging
Drug-Eluting Stents
Female
Humans
Italy
Male
Middle Aged
Multicenter Studies as Topic
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
/ adverse effects
Predictive Value of Tests
Prospective Studies
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
CT scanning
coronary angiography
coronary artery disease
coronary intervention (PCI)
Journal
Open heart
ISSN: 2053-3624
Titre abrégé: Open Heart
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101631219
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2020
10 2020
Historique:
received:
17
01
2020
revised:
22
06
2020
accepted:
02
09
2020
entrez:
30
10
2020
pubmed:
31
10
2020
medline:
23
12
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The role of planned angiographic control (PAC) over a conservative management driven by symptoms and ischaemia following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main (ULM) with second-generation drug-eluting stents remains controversial. PAC may timely detect intrastent restenosis, but it is still unclear if this translated into improved prognosis. PULSE is a prospective, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Consecutive patients treated with PCI on ULM will be included, and after the index revascularisation patients will be randomised to PAC strategy performed with CT coronary after 6 months versus a conservative symptoms and ischaemia-driven follow-up management. Follow-up will be for at least 18 months from randomisation. Major adverse cardiovascular events at 18 months (a composite endpoint including death, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI) (excluding periprocedural MI), unstable angina, stent thrombosis) will be the primary efficacy outcome. Secondary outcomes will include any unplanned target lesion revascularisation (TLR) and TLR driven by PAC. Safety endpoints embrace worsening of renal failure and bleeding events. A sample size of 550 patients (275 per group) is required to have a 80% chance of detecting, as significant at the 5% level, a 7.5% relative reduction in the primary outcome. NCT04144881.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The role of planned angiographic control (PAC) over a conservative management driven by symptoms and ischaemia following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main (ULM) with second-generation drug-eluting stents remains controversial. PAC may timely detect intrastent restenosis, but it is still unclear if this translated into improved prognosis.
METHODS AND ANALYSIS
PULSE is a prospective, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Consecutive patients treated with PCI on ULM will be included, and after the index revascularisation patients will be randomised to PAC strategy performed with CT coronary after 6 months versus a conservative symptoms and ischaemia-driven follow-up management. Follow-up will be for at least 18 months from randomisation. Major adverse cardiovascular events at 18 months (a composite endpoint including death, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI) (excluding periprocedural MI), unstable angina, stent thrombosis) will be the primary efficacy outcome. Secondary outcomes will include any unplanned target lesion revascularisation (TLR) and TLR driven by PAC. Safety endpoints embrace worsening of renal failure and bleeding events. A sample size of 550 patients (275 per group) is required to have a 80% chance of detecting, as significant at the 5% level, a 7.5% relative reduction in the primary outcome.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
NCT04144881.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33122421
pii: openhrt-2020-001253
doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2020-001253
pmc: PMC7597506
pii:
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04144881']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial Protocol
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
Heart. 2013 Aug;99(15):1106-12
pubmed: 23723447
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Feb;18(2):159-166
pubmed: 27099274
Am Heart J. 2015 May;169(5):663-73
pubmed: 25965714
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Mar 22;57(12):1349-58
pubmed: 21414531
N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 15;360(3):213-24
pubmed: 19144937
Clin Res Cardiol. 2010 Apr;99(4):235-42
pubmed: 20047051
Int J Cardiol. 2016 May 15;211:37-42
pubmed: 26970964
Circulation. 2011 Jun 14;123(23):2736-47
pubmed: 21670242
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Nov 2;56(19):1597-604
pubmed: 20888162
EuroIntervention. 2007 Feb;2(4):435-43
pubmed: 19755282
Eur Heart J. 2015 Jan 7;36(2):94-9
pubmed: 25298237
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jun 24;63(24):2659-73
pubmed: 24632282
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Jul 28;66(4):403-69
pubmed: 25553722
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Jul 1;118(1):32-9
pubmed: 27209125
Circulation. 1999 Nov 2;100(18):1872-8
pubmed: 10545431
Eur Heart J. 2019 Jan 7;40(2):87-165
pubmed: 30165437
Eur Heart J. 2017 Nov 7;38(42):3160-3172
pubmed: 29020300
Crit Care. 2007;11(2):R31
pubmed: 17331245
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Apr;3(4):403-11
pubmed: 20398868
EuroIntervention. 2013 Nov;9(7):809-16
pubmed: 24280157