A Survey on the Use and Barriers of Surface Electromyography in Neurorehabilitation.
clinical research
expert opinion
muscle activation
neurorehabilitation
sEMG
surface electromyography
survey
Journal
Frontiers in neurology
ISSN: 1664-2295
Titre abrégé: Front Neurol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101546899
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
17
06
2020
accepted:
25
08
2020
entrez:
30
10
2020
pubmed:
31
10
2020
medline:
31
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Historical, educational, and technical barriers have been reported to limit the use of surface electromyography (sEMG) in clinical neurorehabilitation settings. In an attempt to identify, review, rank, and interpret potential factors that may play a role in this scenario, we gathered information on (1) current use of sEMG and its clinical potential; (2) professional figures primarily dealing with sEMG; (3) educational aspects, and (4) possible barriers and reasons for its apparently limited use in neurorehabilitation. To this aim, an online 30-question survey was sent to 52 experts on sEMG from diverse standpoints, backgrounds, and countries. Participants were asked to respond to each question on a 5-point Likert scale or by ranking items. A cut-off of 75% agreement was chosen as the consensus threshold. Thirty-five invitees (67%) completed the electronic survey. Consensus was reached for 77% of the proposed questions encompassing current trends in sEMG use in neurorehabilitation, educational, technical, and methodological features as well as its translational utility for clinicians and patients. Data evidenced the clinical utility of sEMG for patient assessment, to define the intervention plan, and to complement/optimize other methods used to quantify muscle and physical function. The aggregate opinion of the interviewed experts confirmed that sEMG is more frequently employed in technical/methodological than clinical research. Moreover, the slow dissemination of research findings and the lack of education on sEMG seem to prevent prompt transfer into practice. The findings of the present survey may contribute to the ongoing debate on the appropriateness and value of sEMG for neurorehabilitation professionals and its potential translation into clinical settings.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33123079
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.573616
pmc: PMC7566898
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
573616Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Manca, Cereatti, Bar-On, Botter, Della Croce, Knaflitz, Maffiuletti, Mazzoli, Merlo, Roatta, Turolla and Deriu.
Références
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2008 Dec;18(6):879-90
pubmed: 19004645
Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2003 Jun;28(2):81-91
pubmed: 12827987
Gait Posture. 2017 Oct;58:252-260
pubmed: 28825997
Phys Ther. 2016 May;96(5):594-6
pubmed: 27140963
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2019 Oct;48:53-68
pubmed: 31229925
Phys Ther. 1983 Sep;63(9):1448-59
pubmed: 6351119
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Apr;100(4):663-675
pubmed: 30392855
Clin Neurophysiol. 2012 Jun;123(6):1216-25
pubmed: 22364723
Neurophysiol Clin. 2005 Jul;35(2-3):59-71
pubmed: 16087069
Brain. 1995 Apr;118 ( Pt 2):495-510
pubmed: 7735890
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Apr;67(4):401-9
pubmed: 24581294
Front Neurol. 2020 Sep 02;11:934
pubmed: 32982942
Spinal Cord. 2011 Mar;49(3):421-9
pubmed: 21079622
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2013 Apr;23(2):285-95
pubmed: 23123100
Phys Ther. 2017 May 1;97(5):497-498
pubmed: 28605558
JAMA. 2003 Apr 16;289(15):1969-75
pubmed: 12697800
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 Feb;84(2):291-6
pubmed: 12601663
Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 1973;1:259-84
pubmed: 4806378
Clin Neurophysiol. 2013 Apr;124(4):740-51
pubmed: 23146713
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1994 Jun;90(6):404-32
pubmed: 7515784
Eur Spine J. 2018 Sep;27(9):2130-2138
pubmed: 29869721
Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2019 Nov;62(6):426-430
pubmed: 30500361
Phys Ther. 1991 Dec;71(12):961-80
pubmed: 1946629
Adv Neurol. 1983;39:907-14
pubmed: 6660128
Hastings Cent Rep. 1975 Dec;5(6):13-23
pubmed: 126962
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 3;10(6):e037133
pubmed: 32499274
Neurology. 2000 Jul 25;55(2):171-7
pubmed: 10908886
Eval Health Prof. 2006 Mar;29(1):7-32
pubmed: 16510878
Brain. 1987 Apr;110 ( Pt 2):361-79
pubmed: 3567527