Macromastia: an economic burden? A disease cost analysis based on real-world data in Germany.
Breast reduction mammoplasty
Conservative treatment
Disease costs
Gigantomastia
Health care
Macromastia
Journal
Archives of gynecology and obstetrics
ISSN: 1432-0711
Titre abrégé: Arch Gynecol Obstet
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8710213
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2021
02 2021
Historique:
received:
10
08
2020
accepted:
13
10
2020
pubmed:
31
10
2020
medline:
16
3
2021
entrez:
30
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Symptomatic macromastia causes physical and psychological problems that can lead to restrictions in the patients' social and working lives and a reduced quality of life. Associated medical treatments also have a considerable impact on health-care costs. Several studies have assessed these costs, but the total disease costs of macromastia have never been evaluated on the basis of real-world data. The data for 76 patients who underwent reduction mammoplasty between 2008 and 2016 were collected using a two-part questionnaire (preoperative and postoperative), as well as the patient files. Topics surveyed, besides demographic data, included physician visits, medical imaging, medical procedures, medical treatments, rehabilitation and convalescent measures, drug intake, medical aids, exercise activity, and sick leave days before surgery, to calculate the costs per year of conservative treatment of symptomatic macromastia. The mean time from start of symptoms to surgery was 11.82 years. The data for this group of patients with symptomatic macromastia show that costs per patient amount to €1677.55 per year. These costs include medical consultation, radiological imaging, medical treatments and procedures, physical therapy and rehabilitation, medication, special brassieres, exercise classes costs for sick leave due to problems with macromastia, and travel expenses. These results show that considerable health-care costs arise due to macromastia with conservative treatment. Overall, macromastia costs €1677.55 per patient/year. In particular, lost productivity due to sick days and the costs of physiotherapy are factors driving the high costs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33123809
doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05841-7
pii: 10.1007/s00404-020-05841-7
pmc: PMC7858209
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
521-531Références
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993 Jun;91(7):1270-6
pubmed: 8497527
Br J Plast Surg. 1997 Jun;50(4):242-8
pubmed: 9215080
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2007 Sep;16(7):1062-9
pubmed: 17903083
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997 Sep;100(4):875-83
pubmed: 9290655
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999 Jan;103(1):76-82; discussion 83-5
pubmed: 9915166
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000 Apr;105(4):1314-9
pubmed: 10744220
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Feb;119(2):481-6
pubmed: 17230079
Ann Plast Surg. 1980 Dec;5(6):425-31
pubmed: 6451196
BMJ. 1996 Aug 24;313(7055):454-7
pubmed: 8776311
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2008 Apr;40(2):100-4
pubmed: 18437668
Ann Plast Surg. 2005 Sep;55(3):227-31
pubmed: 16106157
Zentralbl Gynakol. 2004 Dec;126(6):359-64
pubmed: 15570550
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005 Apr;115(4):1034-8
pubmed: 15793442
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2006 Sep-Oct;30(5):535-7
pubmed: 16858658
Mayo Clin Proc. 2001 May;76(5):503-10
pubmed: 11357797
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 1999 Mar;31(2):137-42
pubmed: 10337560
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003 Feb;111(2):688-94
pubmed: 12560689
J Psychosom Res. 1998 Oct;45(4):331-9
pubmed: 9794279
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002 Apr 15;109(5):1556-66
pubmed: 11932597
Klin Wochenschr. 1981 Apr 15;59(8):403-7
pubmed: 6793771
Fertil Steril. 1975 Jul;26(7):627-33
pubmed: 1171026