Evolution of public beliefs about schizophrenia and attitudes towards those afflicted in Austria over two decades.
Attitudes
Austria
Beliefs
Schizophrenia
Time trend
Journal
Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology
ISSN: 1433-9285
Titre abrégé: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8804358
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2021
Aug 2021
Historique:
received:
03
07
2020
accepted:
23
09
2020
pubmed:
31
10
2020
medline:
30
7
2021
entrez:
30
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In the recent years, it was possible to observe two trends: First, there has been a trend to greater mental health literacy, in particular towards a biological model of schizophrenia. Secondly, an increase in public acceptance of professional help and psychiatric treatment has been observed in western countries. This indicates that the societal idea about mental illness and how it can be treated has changed. However, no changes or even changes to the worse occurred regarding the attitudes towards those suffering from the illness, particularly concerning schizophrenia. Thus, the question arises as to whether similar trends can also be found in Austria. We use data from two representative population surveys in Austria, conducted 1998 (n = 1042) and 2018 (n = 1010) using face-to-face interviews, the same sampling procedure, interview mode, and interview schedule. The data show that today Austrians tend to opt less frequently for genetic factors and chronic stress as causes of schizophrenia than 20 years ago. There were only slight changes regarding intended first help-seeking actions except for a stronger endorsement of lay help. The believe in an effective treatment of schizophrenia has increased significantly and there was a marked trend towards preference of medication over psychotherapy. Social acceptance of people with schizophrenia has increased, but also the ascription of violence. In summary, the evolution of attitudes and beliefs concerning schizophrenia in Austria shows a rather inconsistent pattern and differs to some extent from what has been observed in other western countries. This is important to know when planning awareness-raising or stigma-reducing initiatives.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33125508
doi: 10.1007/s00127-020-01963-0
pii: 10.1007/s00127-020-01963-0
pmc: PMC8316207
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1427-1435Subventions
Organisme : Common Health Targets by the frame contract from Austrian Pharmaceutical Industries and Social Insurance Gemeinsame Gesundheitsziele aus sdem Rahmen-Pharmavertrag
ID : 99901008400
Informations de copyright
© 2020. The Author(s).
Références
Am J Public Health. 2013 May;103(5):853-60
pubmed: 23488508
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2015 Nov;132(5):357-64
pubmed: 25676686
World Psychiatry. 2015 Oct;14(3):362-3
pubmed: 26407795
Psychiatry Res. 2014 Dec 15;220(1-2):609-14
pubmed: 25110311
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2003 Oct;108(4):304-9
pubmed: 12956832
Psychiatry Res. 2016 Mar 30;237:271-8
pubmed: 26805560
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2014 Mar;48(3):213-5
pubmed: 24151015
Br J Psychiatry. 2011 Nov;199(5):367-72
pubmed: 22045945
Br J Psychiatry. 2012 May;200(5):419-25
pubmed: 22442098
Psychiatry Res. 2012 May 30;197(3):302-6
pubmed: 22417929
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2016 Sep;51(9):1257-64
pubmed: 27048265
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2001 Mar;103(3):220-5
pubmed: 11240579
Br J Psychiatry. 2016 Apr;208(4):389-97
pubmed: 26585098
Psychiatr Prax. 2009 Oct;36(7):327-33
pubmed: 19724998
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Oct;38(10):1735-1743
pubmed: 31589533
Br J Psychiatry. 2013 Aug;203(2):146-51
pubmed: 23787060
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2012 Jun;125(6):440-52
pubmed: 22242976
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Nov;96:95-103
pubmed: 24034956