Morphometric characteristics of cervical vertebrae in subjects with short, normal, and long faces.
Cervical vertebrae
Long face
Morphometric characteristics
Normal face
Short face
Journal
Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA
ISSN: 1279-8517
Titre abrégé: Surg Radiol Anat
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8608029
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Jun 2021
Historique:
received:
31
08
2020
accepted:
10
10
2020
pubmed:
1
11
2020
medline:
11
9
2021
entrez:
31
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The prolonged change in the head posture alters the morphological characteristics of cervical vertebrae. The difference in the head posture among subjects with short, normal, and long anterior facial heights might have a significant influence on the morphological characteristics of cervical vertebrae. Thus, the present study was conducted to evaluate the morphometric characteristics of cervical vertebrae in subjects with short, normal, and long faces. Based on Frankfort mandibular plane angle (FMA) on lateral cephalograms, 135 subjects were equally divided into three groups, i.e. Group I [Short face], II [Normal face], and III [Long face]. The angular variables like Atlas-dens angle (ADA), Pars interarticularis-dens angle (PDA), Pars interarticularis-vertebrae angle of C3 vertebrae (PVA3), Pars interarticularis-vertebrae angle of C4 vertebrae (PVA4), Lamina-Pars interarticularis angle of C2 vertebrae (LP2), Lamina-Pars interarticularis angle of C3 vertebrae (LP3), and Lamina-Pars interarticularis angle of C4 vertebrae (LP4) in the first four cervical vertebrae were measured, analyzed, and compared. Descriptive statistics, analysis of variance, Bonferroni, and Pearson's correlation coefficient tests were used. The P value of 0.05 was considered as the level of significance. All parameters except PDA and PVA3 were comparable among the groups. The PDA was 54.35 A significant difference was found in the PDA among subjects with short, normal, and long faces. The vertical height of the face had a strong correlation with the morphology of axis vertebra.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33128647
doi: 10.1007/s00276-020-02599-0
pii: 10.1007/s00276-020-02599-0
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
865-872Références
Ansar J, Maheshwari S, Verma SK et al (2015) Soft tissue airway dimensions and craniocervical posture in subjects with different growth patterns. Angle Orthod 85:604–610
doi: 10.2319/042314-299.1
Anusuya V, Sharan J, Jena AK (2020) A study of cervical vertebra anomalies among individuals with different sagittal and vertical facial growth patterns. J Craniovert Jun Spine 11:75–80
doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_51_20
Baccetti T, Franchi L, Jr McNamara JA (2005) The cervical vertebral maturation [CVM] method for the assessment of optimal treatment timing in dentofacial orthopedics. Semin Orthod 11:119–129
doi: 10.1053/j.sodo.2005.04.005
Bench RW (1963) Growth of the cervical vertebrae as related to tongue, face, and denture behavior. Am J Orthod 49:183–214
doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(63)90050-2
Bogduk N, Mercer S (2000) Biomechanics of the cervical spine. I: normal kinematics. Clin Biomech 15:633–648
doi: 10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00034-6
Chatzigianni A, Halazonetis DJ (2009) Geometric morphometric evaluation of cervical vertebrae shape and its relationship to skeletal maturation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 136:481.e1–9
Darling DW, Kraus S, Glasheen-Wray MB (1984) Relationship of head posture and the rest position of the mandible. J Prosthet Dent 52:111–115
doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(84)90192-6
Ebraheim NA, Xu R, Knight T et al (1997) Morphometric evaluation of lower cervical pedicle and its projection. Spine 22:1–5
doi: 10.1097/00007632-199701010-00001
Goldstein DF, Kraus SL, Willams WB et al (1984) Influence of cervical posture on mandibular movement. J Prosthet Dent 52:421–426
doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(84)90460-8
Gray S, Bennani H, Kieser JA et al (2016) Morphometric analysis of cervical vertebrae in relation to mandibular growth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 149:92–98
doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.06.028
GündüzArslan S, Dildeş N, Devecioglu Kama J (2014) Cephalometric investigation of first cervical vertebrae morphology and hyoid position in young adults with different sagittal skeletal patterns. Sci World J Article ID 159784:1–8
Huggare J (1991) Association between morphology of the first cervical vertebra, head posture, and craniofacial structures. Eur J Orthod 13:435–440
doi: 10.1093/ejo/13.6.435
Huggare J, Kylämarkula S (1985) Morphology of the first cervical vertebra in children with enlarged adenoids. Eur J Orthod 7:93–96
doi: 10.1093/ejo/7.2.93
Karlsen AT (2004) Association between vertical development of the cervical spine and the face in subjects with varying vertical facial patterns. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 125:597–606
doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.05.017
Kim DH, Kim CJ, Son SM (2018) Neck pain in adults with forward head posture: effects of craniovertebral angle and cervical range of motion. Osong Public Health Res Perspect 9:309–313
doi: 10.24171/j.phrp.2018.9.6.04
Kylamarkula S, Huggare J (1985) Head posture and the morphology of the first cervical vertebra. Eur J Orthod 7:151–156
doi: 10.1093/ejo/7.3.151
Lai EH, Liu JP, Chang JZ et al (2008) Radiographic assessment of skeletal maturation stages for orthodontic patients: hand-wrist bones or cervical vertebrae? J Formos Med Assoc 107:316–325
doi: 10.1016/S0929-6646(08)60093-5
Manfreda E, Mitteroecker P, Bookstein FL et al (2006) Functional morphology of the first cervical vertebra in humans and nonhuman primates. Anat Rec B New Anat 289:184–194
doi: 10.1002/ar.b.20113
Masoud M, Masoud I, Kent RL Jr et al (2008) Assessing skeletal maturity by using blood spot insulin-like growth factor I [IGF-I] testing. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 134:209–216
doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.09.063
Mellado JM, Larrosa R, Martín J et al (2011) MDCT of variations and anomalies of the neural arch and its processes: part 1-pedicles, pars interarticularis, laminae, and spinous process. Am J Roentgenol 197:104–113
doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.5803
Mercer SR, Bogduk N (2001) Joints of the cervical vertebral column. J Orthop Sport Phys 31:174–182
doi: 10.2519/jospt.2001.31.4.174
Nambiar S, Mogra S, Nair BU et al (2014) Morphometric analysis of cervical vertebrae morphology and correlation of cervical vertebrae morphometry, cervical spine inclination and cranial base angle to craniofacial morphology and stature in an adult skeletal class I and class II population. Contem Clin Dent 5:456–460
doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.142809
Ozbek MM, Koklu A (1993) Natural cervical inclination and craniofacial structure. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 104:584–591
doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)80442-1
Solow B, Siersbaek-Nielsen S (1986) Growth changes in head posture related to craniofacial development. Am J Orthod 89:132–140
doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(86)90089-8
Solow B, Tallgren A (1976) Head posture and craniofacial morphology. Am J Phys Anthropol 44:417–435
doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330440306
Soni P, Sharma V, Sengupta J (2008) Cervical vertebrae anomalies-incidental findings on lateral cephalograms. Angle Orthod 78:176–180
doi: 10.2319/091306-370.1
Urbanowicz M (1991) Alteration of vertical dimension and its effect on head and neck posture. CRANIO 9:174–179
doi: 10.1080/08869634.1991.11678365
Vig PS, Showfety KJ, Phillips C (1980) Experimental manipulation of head posture. Am J Orthod 77:258–268
doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(80)90081-0
Watanabe M, Yamaguchi T, Maki K (2010) Cervical vertebra morphology in different skeletal classes: a three-dimensional computed tomography evaluation. Angle Orthod 80:719–724
doi: 10.2319/100609-557.1
Xu R, Nadaud MC, Ebraheim NA et al (1995) Morphology of the second cervical vertebra and the posterior projection of the C2 pedicle axis. Spine 20:259–263
doi: 10.1097/00007632-199502000-00001