Airway emergency management in a pediatric hospital before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Airway Management
/ methods
COVID-19
/ epidemiology
Emergencies
Emergency Service, Hospital
/ organization & administration
Female
Hospitals, Pediatric
/ organization & administration
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Infection Control
/ methods
Intensive Care Units, Neonatal
/ organization & administration
Intensive Care, Neonatal
/ methods
Male
Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care
Pandemics
Patient Care Team
/ organization & administration
Patient Safety
Philadelphia
/ epidemiology
Emergencies
Infant
Intubation
Neonatology
Pediatrics
Journal
International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology
ISSN: 1872-8464
Titre abrégé: Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 8003603
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Dec 2020
Historique:
received:
29
09
2020
revised:
13
10
2020
accepted:
13
10
2020
pubmed:
2
11
2020
medline:
18
12
2020
entrez:
1
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Children's hospitals frequently care for infants with various life-threatening airway anomalies. Management of these infants can be challenging given unique airway anatomy and potential malformations. Airway emergency management must be immediate and precise, often demanding specialized equipment and/or expertise. We developed a Neonatal-Infant Emergency Airway Program to improve medical responses, communication, equipment usage and outcomes for all infants requiring emergent airway interventions in our neonatal and infant intensive care unit (NICU). All patients admitted to our quaternary NICU from 2008 to 2019 were included in this study. Our program consisted of a multidisciplinary airway response team, pager system, and emergency equipment cart. Respiratory therapists present at each emergency event recorded specialist response times, equipment utilization, and outcomes. A multidisciplinary oversite committee reviewed each incident. Since 2008, there were 159 airway emergency events in our NICU (~12 per year). Mean specialist response times decreased from 5.9 ± 4.9 min (2008-2012, mean ± SD) to 4.3 ± 2.2 min (2016-2019, p = 0.12), and the number of incidents with response times >5 min decreased from 28.8 ± 17.8% (2008-2012) to 9.3 ± 11.4% (2016-2019, p = 0.04 by linear regression). As our program became more standardized, we noted better equipment availability and subspecialist communication. Few emergency situations (n = 9, 6%) required operating room management. There were 3 patient deaths (2%). Our airway safety program, including readily available specialists and equipment, facilitated effective resolution of airway emergencies in our NICU and multidisciplinary involvement enabled rapid and effective changes in response to COVID-19 regulations. A similar program could be implemented in other centers.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33130467
pii: S0165-5876(20)30601-7
doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110458
pmc: PMC7568466
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
110458Commentaires et corrections
Type : UpdateOf
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Références
Intensive Care Med. 2014 Nov;40(11):1659-69
pubmed: 25160031
Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016 Aug;21(4):219
pubmed: 27132986
Neonatology. 2020;117(1):65-72
pubmed: 31563910
Clin Perinatol. 2019 Dec;46(4):745-763
pubmed: 31653306