New geographic model of care to manage the post-COVID-19 elective surgery aftershock in England: a retrospective observational study.
Adult
Betacoronavirus
COVID-19
Community Networks
/ organization & administration
Coronavirus Infections
/ epidemiology
Efficiency, Organizational
Elective Surgical Procedures
/ classification
England
/ epidemiology
Health Services Accessibility
Humans
Intersectoral Collaboration
Markov Chains
Models, Organizational
Pandemics
Pneumonia, Viral
/ epidemiology
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
SARS-CoV-2
State Medicine
/ organization & administration
Waiting Lists
health policy
organisation of health services
public health
surgery
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 10 2020
31 10 2020
Historique:
entrez:
1
11
2020
pubmed:
2
11
2020
medline:
20
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The suspension of elective surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic is unprecedented and has resulted in record volumes of patients waiting for operations. Novel approaches that maximise capacity and efficiency of surgical care are urgently required. This study applies Markov multiscale community detection (MMCD), an unsupervised graph-based clustering framework, to identify new surgical care models based on pooled waiting-lists delivered across an expanded network of surgical providers. Retrospective observational study using Hospital Episode Statistics. Public and private hospitals providing surgical care to National Health Service (NHS) patients in England. All adult patients resident in England undergoing NHS-funded planned surgical procedures between 1 April 2017 and 31 March 2018. The identification of the most common planned surgical procedures in England (high-volume procedures (HVP)) and proportion of low, medium and high-risk patients undergoing each HVP. The mapping of hospitals providing surgical care onto optimised groupings based on patient usage data. A total of 7 811 891 planned operations were identified in 4 284 925 adults during the 1-year period of our study. The 28 most common surgical procedures accounted for a combined 3 907 474 operations (50.0% of the total). 2 412 613 (61.7%) of these most common procedures involved 'low risk' patients. Patients travelled an average of 11.3 km for these procedures. Based on the data, MMCD partitioned England into 45, 16 and 7 mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive natural surgical communities of increasing coarseness. The coarser partitions into 16 and seven surgical communities were shown to be associated with balanced supply and demand for surgical care within communities. Pooled waiting-lists for low-risk elective procedures and patients across integrated, expanded natural surgical community networks have the potential to increase efficiency by innovatively flexing existing supply to better match demand.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33130573
pii: bmjopen-2020-042392
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042392
pmc: PMC7783383
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e042392Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: JK reports consultancy for Verb robotics/Ethicon and is a shareholder of OneWelbeck Day Surgery.
Références
J R Soc Med. 2004 Mar;97(3):119-20
pubmed: 14996957
Clin Transpl. 1998;:121-31
pubmed: 10503091
J Health Econ. 2007 Mar 1;26(2):263-85
pubmed: 16978718
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Feb 23;(2):CD005610
pubmed: 25706039
Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Mar 15;173(6):676-82
pubmed: 21330339
Br J Surg. 2020 Oct;107(11):1440-1449
pubmed: 32395848
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Sep;5(9):804-805
pubmed: 32682493
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2004;3(4):195-203
pubmed: 15901194
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Nov;18(11):1445-1453
pubmed: 28986012
Appl Netw Sci. 2019;4(1):2
pubmed: 30906850
Anaesthesia. 2010 Jun;65(6):625-40
pubmed: 20565395
Ann Surg. 2020 Jun 2;:
pubmed: 32487802
J R Soc Med. 2002 Dec;95(12):598-600
pubmed: 12461145
Health Econ. 2007 Feb;16(2):113-28
pubmed: 16888753
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e32210
pubmed: 22384178
BMJ. 2005 Feb 5;330(7486):284
pubmed: 15695275
J Public Health Med. 2000 Jun;22(2):202-10
pubmed: 10912560
Ann Surg. 2020 Aug;272(2):e40-e42
pubmed: 32675489
Health Econ. 2007 Aug;16(8):763-79
pubmed: 17238226