Relationship Between the OF Classification and Radiological Outcome of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures After Kyphoplasty.
OF classification
fracture classification
kyphoplasty
osteoporosis
vertebral compression fracture
Journal
Global spine journal
ISSN: 2192-5682
Titre abrégé: Global Spine J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101596156
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2022
May 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
3
11
2020
medline:
3
11
2020
entrez:
2
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Retrospective cohort study. The OF classification is a new classification for osteoporotic vertebral fractures. The aim of this study was to clarify the relationship between preoperative OF subgroups and the postoperative outcome after kyphoplasty in patients with such fractures. Patients who underwent kyphoplasty of a single osteoporotic vertebral fracture were included and divided into groups according to the OF subgroups. Pre- and postoperative plain radiographs were analyzed in regard to the restoration of vertebral body height and local kyphotic angle (LKA). Additionally, clinical data including pre- and postoperative Visual Analogue Scale pain scores was documented. The clinical and radiological results were compared pre- and postoperatively within groups and between groups. A total of 156 patients from OF subgroups 2 to 4 were included (OF 2: n = 58; OF 3: n = 36; OF 4: n = 62). Patients from all groups experienced significant pain relief postoperatively ( A higher OF subgroup is related to a higher radiological benefit from kyphoplasty. This confirms that the OF classification is an appropriate tool for the preoperative assessment of osteoporotic fractures.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33131331
doi: 10.1177/2192568220964051
pmc: PMC9109556
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
646-653Références
Osteoporos Int. 2014 Oct;25(10):2359-81
pubmed: 25182228
J Bone Miner Res. 2003 Sep;18(9):1664-73
pubmed: 12968676
Unfallchirurg. 2017 Dec;120(12):1071-1085
pubmed: 29143066
J Bone Miner Res. 2004 Jul;19(7):1172-80
pubmed: 15177001
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2007 Dec;5(4):345-51
pubmed: 18179993
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2014 Jan;13(1):57-65
pubmed: 24073682
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2019 May;180:101-105
pubmed: 30953973
BMJ. 1996 May 18;312(7041):1254-9
pubmed: 8634613
Bone. 2004 Aug;35(2):375-82
pubmed: 15268886
Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 1;10(1):8894
pubmed: 32483183
J Intern Med. 1996 Apr;239(4):299-304
pubmed: 8774383
Milbank Q. 1989;67(3-4):450-84
pubmed: 2534562
Osteoporos Int. 2013 Apr;24(4):1419-28
pubmed: 22733092
Global Spine J. 2018 Sep;8(2 Suppl):50S-55S
pubmed: 30210962
Bone. 2003 Oct;33(4):522-32
pubmed: 14555255
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2018 Oct;173:176-181
pubmed: 30149305
Bone. 1996 Mar;18(3 Suppl):179S-183S
pubmed: 8777085
Global Spine J. 2018 Sep;8(2 Suppl):46S-49S
pubmed: 30210960
Osteoporos Int. 2006 Dec;17(12):1726-33
pubmed: 16983459
Mo Med. 2002 Jan;99(1):19-24
pubmed: 11816351
J Orthop Sci. 2018 Jan;23(1):51-56
pubmed: 28988630
Eur Spine J. 2009 Jan;18(1):77-88
pubmed: 19082846
Surg Neurol Int. 2019 Apr 24;10:54
pubmed: 31528392
Bone. 2003 Oct;33(4):505-13
pubmed: 14555253
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2010 Mar;47(3):199-202
pubmed: 20379472
Bone. 1992;13 Suppl 2:S27-31
pubmed: 1627411
Osteoporos Int. 2007 Dec;18(12):1617-24
pubmed: 17611706
Osteoporos Int. 2004 Mar;15(3):175-9
pubmed: 14691617
J Bone Miner Res. 2005 Aug;20(8):1349-55
pubmed: 16007332