Lymphatic filariasis in Fiji: progress towards elimination, 1997-2007.
Elimination
Fiji
Lymphatic filariasis
PacELF
Parasitic disease
Vector
Journal
Tropical medicine and health
ISSN: 1348-8945
Titre abrégé: Trop Med Health
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 101215093
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
22
03
2020
accepted:
29
06
2020
entrez:
2
11
2020
pubmed:
3
11
2020
medline:
3
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Lymphatic filariasis (LF) is a major public health problem in the Pacific Region, including in Fiji. Through transmission by the mosquito vector This study reviewed and collated past data on LF in Fiji between 1997 and 2007. Sources included published papers as well as unpublished PacELF and WHO program meeting and survey reports. Records were held at Fiji's Department of Health and Medical Services, James Cook University and the WHO office in Suva, Fiji. Baseline surveys between 1997 and 2002 showed that Fiji was highly endemic for LF with an estimated 16.6% of the population antigen positive and 6.3% microfilaria positive at that time. Five rounds of annual mass drug administration (MDA) using albendazole and diethylcarbamazine commenced in 2002. Programmatic coverage reported was 58-70% per year, but an independent coverage survey in 2006 in Northern Division after the fifth MDA suggested that actual coverage may have been higher. Monitoring of the program consisted of antigen prevalence surveys in all ages with sentinel and spot check surveys carried out in 2002 (pre MDA), 2004, and 2005, together with knowledge, attitude, and practice surveys. The stop-MDA survey (C survey) in 2007 was a nationwide stratified cluster survey of all ages according to PacELF guidelines, designed to sample by administrative division to identify areas still needing MDA. The national antigen prevalence in 2007 was reduced by more than a third to 9.5%, ranging from 0.9% in Western Division to 15.4% in Eastern Division, while microfilaria prevalence was reduced by almost four-fifths to 1.4%. Having not reached the target threshold of 1% prevalence in all ages, Fiji wisely decided to continue MDA after 2007 but to move from nationwide implementation to four (later five) separate evaluation units with independent timelines using global guidelines, building on program experience to put more emphasis on increasing coverage through prioritized communication strategies, community participation, and morbidity alleviation. Fiji conducted nationwide MDA for LF annually between 2002 and 2006, monitored by extensive surveys of prevalence, knowledge, and coverage. From a high baseline prevalence in all divisions, large reductions in overall and age-specific prevalence were achieved, especially in the prevalence of microfilariae, but the threshold for stopping MDA was not reached. Fiji has a large rural and geographically widespread population, program management was not consistent over this period, and coverage achieved was likely not optimal in all areas. After learning from these many challenges and activities, Fiji was able to build on the progress achieved and the heterogeneity observed in prevalence to realign towards a more stratified and improved program after 2007. The information presented here will assist the country to progress towards validating elimination in subsequent years.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Lymphatic filariasis (LF) is a major public health problem in the Pacific Region, including in Fiji. Through transmission by the mosquito vector
METHODS
METHODS
This study reviewed and collated past data on LF in Fiji between 1997 and 2007. Sources included published papers as well as unpublished PacELF and WHO program meeting and survey reports. Records were held at Fiji's Department of Health and Medical Services, James Cook University and the WHO office in Suva, Fiji.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Baseline surveys between 1997 and 2002 showed that Fiji was highly endemic for LF with an estimated 16.6% of the population antigen positive and 6.3% microfilaria positive at that time. Five rounds of annual mass drug administration (MDA) using albendazole and diethylcarbamazine commenced in 2002. Programmatic coverage reported was 58-70% per year, but an independent coverage survey in 2006 in Northern Division after the fifth MDA suggested that actual coverage may have been higher. Monitoring of the program consisted of antigen prevalence surveys in all ages with sentinel and spot check surveys carried out in 2002 (pre MDA), 2004, and 2005, together with knowledge, attitude, and practice surveys. The stop-MDA survey (C survey) in 2007 was a nationwide stratified cluster survey of all ages according to PacELF guidelines, designed to sample by administrative division to identify areas still needing MDA. The national antigen prevalence in 2007 was reduced by more than a third to 9.5%, ranging from 0.9% in Western Division to 15.4% in Eastern Division, while microfilaria prevalence was reduced by almost four-fifths to 1.4%. Having not reached the target threshold of 1% prevalence in all ages, Fiji wisely decided to continue MDA after 2007 but to move from nationwide implementation to four (later five) separate evaluation units with independent timelines using global guidelines, building on program experience to put more emphasis on increasing coverage through prioritized communication strategies, community participation, and morbidity alleviation.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Fiji conducted nationwide MDA for LF annually between 2002 and 2006, monitored by extensive surveys of prevalence, knowledge, and coverage. From a high baseline prevalence in all divisions, large reductions in overall and age-specific prevalence were achieved, especially in the prevalence of microfilariae, but the threshold for stopping MDA was not reached. Fiji has a large rural and geographically widespread population, program management was not consistent over this period, and coverage achieved was likely not optimal in all areas. After learning from these many challenges and activities, Fiji was able to build on the progress achieved and the heterogeneity observed in prevalence to realign towards a more stratified and improved program after 2007. The information presented here will assist the country to progress towards validating elimination in subsequent years.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33132735
doi: 10.1186/s41182-020-00245-4
pii: 245
pmc: PMC7592542
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
88Informations de copyright
© World Health Organization 2020.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interestsAuthors declare that they have no competing interests.
Références
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 Mar 16;14(3):e0008106
pubmed: 32176703
Filaria J. 2006 Aug 16;5:10
pubmed: 16914040
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011 Dec;5(12):e1366
pubmed: 22216361
Trop Biomed. 2012 Mar;29(1):24-38
pubmed: 22543600
Trop Med Health. 2011 Mar;39(1):17-30
pubmed: 22028608
Trop Med Health. 2018 May 15;46:12
pubmed: 29785168
J Hyg (Lond). 1971 Jun;69(2):273-86
pubmed: 4397424
Bull World Health Organ. 1998;76(6):575-9
pubmed: 10191553
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 Jun 08;10(6):e0004740
pubmed: 27275844
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2019 Dec;101(6):1325-1330
pubmed: 31595868
Trop Med Health. 2019 Jul 15;47:43
pubmed: 31346312
Korean J Parasitol. 2008 Sep;46(3):119-25
pubmed: 18830049
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1964 Nov;58:545-51
pubmed: 14217013
Trop Med Health. 2019 Mar 15;47:20
pubmed: 30923457
J Trop Med Hyg. 1952 Aug;55(8):169-73
pubmed: 12991332
J Rural Med. 2012;7(2):65-72
pubmed: 25650010
Trop Med Infect Dis. 2018 Jun 04;3(2):
pubmed: 30274454
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014 Nov 20;8(11):e3319
pubmed: 25412180
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Sep 18;11(9):e0005914
pubmed: 28922418
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1961 Mar;55:178-87
pubmed: 13689164
Trop Med Health. 2017 Nov 1;45:34
pubmed: 29118654