Large Diameter Head in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

Adverse effect Bearing surfaces Dislocation Primary Total hip arthroplasty

Journal

Indian journal of orthopaedics
ISSN: 0019-5413
Titre abrégé: Indian J Orthop
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 0137736

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2020
Historique:
received: 02 04 2020
accepted: 18 05 2020
entrez: 2 11 2020
pubmed: 3 11 2020
medline: 3 11 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The literature around use of Large Diameter Heads (LDH) is abundantly available for revision Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) but is lacking for primary uncomplicated THA. This systematic review was undertaken to synthesize data around primary THA involving LDH and analyze the associated complications (dislocation, volumetric wear, implant survivorship and functional score) along with reported effects on range of motion (ROM), patient reported outcomes and impingement rate/groin pain. A PRISMA compliant systematic review was done using extensive search in PubMed database, along with offline search looking for the literature published in English language between 2008 and 2018. The articles providing data on the use of large diameter heads (LDH) (36 mm or larger) on various bearing surfaces were collected. This included robust national joint registries of different countries. Narrative approach to data synthesis was used. A total of 23 papers met our inclusion criteria, including six national joint registries. It was observed that LDH had significantly low dislocation rates, excellent implant survival rate as per Kaplan-Meier survivorship (> 90% at five years). Surgical approaches, except Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS), did not increase any risk of dislocation as long as it was meticulously repaired. There was no significant improvement in any functional scores or improved ROM. LDH of 32-36 mm are now commonly used in primary THA and is accepted as a popular size. The beneficial effects of a large head size are negated beyond 38 mm. The most favored size for LDH THA, therefore, is 36 mm contrary to the older literature favoring 28 mm.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33133401
doi: 10.1007/s43465-020-00146-y
pii: 146
pmc: PMC7573004
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

784-794

Informations de copyright

© Indian Orthopaedics Association 2020.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of interestThe author(s) declare no conflicts of interest.

Références

J Arthroplasty. 2010 Sep;25(6):839-43
pubmed: 19775859
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2018 Apr 04;29:30-33
pubmed: 29692894
HSS J. 2012 Oct;8(3):270-4
pubmed: 24082871
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Jul;29(7):1412-7
pubmed: 24582159
J Arthroplasty. 2012 Apr;27(4):545-50
pubmed: 21908166
Acta Orthop. 2013 Aug;84(4):342-7
pubmed: 23799348
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015 Feb;101(1 Suppl):S25-9
pubmed: 25596984
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Dec;467(12):3290-6
pubmed: 19690932
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:4209634
pubmed: 28812014
BMJ. 2011 Nov 29;343:d7434
pubmed: 22127517
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2013 Aug;42(8):E53-9
pubmed: 24078959
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011 Jun;97(4 Suppl):S42-8
pubmed: 21531648
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015 Jun;101(4):437-41
pubmed: 25899667
Scand J Surg. 2013;102(2):117-23
pubmed: 23820688
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2012 Dec;3(2):94-7
pubmed: 26403445
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 Feb;92(2):202-8
pubmed: 20130309
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2012 Jan;28(1):30-7
pubmed: 22226059
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991 Jul;73(4):551-8
pubmed: 2071634
Int Orthop. 2011 Dec;35(12):1771-6
pubmed: 21373801
Acta Orthop. 2010 Feb;81(1):34-41
pubmed: 20180715
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jul;33(7):2187-2191
pubmed: 29588121
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2013 Nov;101(11):3320-6
pubmed: 23529961
J Arthroplasty. 2011 Sep;26(6):978.e5-8
pubmed: 21130601
J Arthroplasty. 2005 Jan;20(1):11-9
pubmed: 15660054
J Arthroplasty. 2013 Aug;28(7):1235-7
pubmed: 23618754
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Feb;473(2):509-20
pubmed: 25367107
Indian J Orthop. 2014 Jul;48(4):410-4
pubmed: 25143647
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Jul;93(7):876-80
pubmed: 21705556
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Nov;87(11):2456-63
pubmed: 16264121
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Feb;29(2):401-4
pubmed: 23891058
Biomed J. 2015 Dec;38(6):538-43
pubmed: 27013454
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016 Oct;102(6):735-40
pubmed: 27184931
J Arthroplasty. 2013 Sep;28(8):1415-20
pubmed: 23602233
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Dec;(429):102-7
pubmed: 15577473
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000 Sep;82(9):1300-7
pubmed: 11005521

Auteurs

G Neupane (G)

Department of Orthopaedics, Chitwan Medical College, Chitwan, Nepal.

R Madhusudhan (R)

Department of Orthopaedics, Chitwan Medical College, Chitwan, Nepal.
Glan Clwyd Hospital, Wales, LL185UJ UK.

A Shrestha (A)

Department of Orthopaedics, Chitwan Medical College, Chitwan, Nepal.

R Vaishya (R)

Department of Orthopaedics, Chitwan Medical College, Chitwan, Nepal.
Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, New Delhi, India.

Classifications MeSH