Chemical patterns of colony membership and mother-offspring similarity in Antarctic fur seals are reproducible.
Chemical fingerprint
Exact replication study
Fur seal
Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS)
Mother-offspring similarity
Odour profile
Olfactory communication
Pinniped
Reproducible science
Wild population
Journal
PeerJ
ISSN: 2167-8359
Titre abrégé: PeerJ
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101603425
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
30
04
2020
accepted:
17
09
2020
entrez:
2
11
2020
pubmed:
3
11
2020
medline:
3
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Replication studies are essential for evaluating the validity of previous research findings. However, it has proven challenging to reproduce the results of ecological and evolutionary studies, partly because of the complexity and lability of many of the phenomena being investigated, but also due to small sample sizes, low statistical power and publication bias. Additionally, replication is often considered too difficult in field settings where many factors are beyond the investigator's control and where spatial and temporal dependencies may be strong. We investigated the feasibility of reproducing original research findings in the field of chemical ecology by performing an exact replication of a previous study of Antarctic fur seals (
Identifiants
pubmed: 33133782
doi: 10.7717/peerj.10131
pii: 10131
pmc: PMC7580581
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e10131Informations de copyright
© 2020 Tebbe et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Références
Science. 2015 Aug 28;349(6251):aac4716
pubmed: 26315443
R Soc Open Sci. 2018 Apr 18;5(4):171743
pubmed: 29765642
Bioscience. 2017 Mar 1;67(3):282-289
pubmed: 28596617
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Nov;87(21):8413-6
pubmed: 2236049
Behav Brain Res. 2018 Jun 1;345:39-48
pubmed: 29474810
Chem Senses. 2011 Jul;36(6):555-64
pubmed: 21444931
Nature. 2007 Feb 22;445(7130):912-4
pubmed: 17287726
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Sep 8;112(36):E5005-12
pubmed: 26261311
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Apr 7;282(1804):20142994
pubmed: 25740891
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e21162
pubmed: 21738615
BMC Bioinformatics. 2010 Jul 30;11:405
pubmed: 20673335
Microbiome. 2018 Feb 06;6(1):28
pubmed: 29409543
Nature. 2012 Mar 28;483(7391):531-3
pubmed: 22460880
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2002 May;77(2):211-22
pubmed: 12056747
Biol Lett. 2007 Aug 22;3(4):428-30
pubmed: 17535789
Clin Chem. 2017 Nov 1;63(11):1777
pubmed: 32100823
Biol Lett. 2011 Feb 23;7(1):60-2
pubmed: 20685695
EMBO J. 2019 Jan 15;38(2):
pubmed: 30518534
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 7;13(6):e0198311
pubmed: 29879149
Psychol Sci. 2015 May;26(5):559-69
pubmed: 25800521
Sci Transl Med. 2016 Jun 1;8(341):341ps12
pubmed: 27252173
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 13;11(1):e0145352
pubmed: 26761814
Mol Ecol. 2008 Jul;17(14):3225-33
pubmed: 18565115
Nature. 2016 May 25;533(7604):452-4
pubmed: 27225100
G3 (Bethesda). 2020 Aug 5;10(8):2787-2799
pubmed: 32540866
Biol Lett. 2016 Jan;12(1):20150875
pubmed: 26740566
Brain Behav Immun. 2011 Mar;25(3):397-407
pubmed: 21040780
Mol Ecol. 2006 Oct;15(12):3841-7
pubmed: 17032279
J Biol. 2010;9(2):13
pubmed: 20236486
Mol Ecol. 2019 May;28(9):2406-2422
pubmed: 30849214
Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Jan 22;278(1703):274-80
pubmed: 20685707
PeerJ. 2019 Sep 10;7:e7654
pubmed: 31565572
PLoS Biol. 2019 Apr 9;17(4):e3000188
pubmed: 30964856
Behav Processes. 2003 Feb 28;61(1-2):77-85
pubmed: 12543485
Ecol Evol. 2016 Apr 06;6(10):3185-97
pubmed: 27103986
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 16;13(7):e0200303
pubmed: 30011289
BMC Biol. 2015 Oct 28;13:88
pubmed: 26510635
Q Rev Biol. 2006 Sep;81(3):221-36
pubmed: 17051829
Biol Lett. 2006 Mar 22;2(1):106-9
pubmed: 17148339