Nursing home residents' ADL status, institution-dwelling and association with outdoor activity: a cross-sectional study.
ADL status
Activities
Nursing homes
Older people
Outdoors
Journal
PeerJ
ISSN: 2167-8359
Titre abrégé: PeerJ
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101603425
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
14
11
2019
accepted:
27
09
2020
entrez:
2
11
2020
pubmed:
3
11
2020
medline:
3
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The Norwegian regulations for nursing homes consider access to meaningful activities to be an indicator for the quality of nursing homes. Activities of daily living (ADL) provide important basic self-care skills for nursing home residents. Due to the physical changes caused by ageing and comorbidities, nursing home residents may experience functional decline over time, which may affect their ability to perform meaningful ADL, such as outdoor activity, which is considered a valuable and meaningful activity in Norwegian culture. This study aimed to investigate the association between ADL status, institution-dwelling and outdoor activity among nursing home residents. This cross-sectional study included 784 residents aged >67 years living in 21 nursing homes in 15 Norwegian municipalities between November 2016 and May 2018. The Barthel Index was used to assess the nursing home residents' ADL status. Other variables collected were age, gender, body weight and height, visits per month, institution, ward, and participation in weekly outdoor activities. Descriptive statistics were used to provide an overview of the residents' characteristics. A Poisson regression model was used to test the association between the outdoor activity level as the dependent variable and ADL score, institution, and other control variables as independent variables. More than half (57%) of the nursing home residents in this sample did not go outdoors. More than 50% of the residents had an ADL score <10, which indicates low performance status. Further, we found that residents' ADL status, institution, ward, and number of visits had an impact on how often the residents went outdoors. The nursing home residents in this study rarely went outdoors, which is interesting because Norwegians appreciate this activity. Differences in the number of visits might explain why some residents went outdoors more often than other residents did. Our findings also highlight that the institutions impact the outdoor activity. How the institutions are organized and how important this activity is considered to be in the institutions determine how often the activity is performed. The low frequency of the outdoor activities might be explained by a low ADL score. More than 50% of the residents had an ADL score <10, which indicates low performance status. Despite regulations for nursing home quality in Norway, this result suggests that organizational differences matter, which is an important implication for further research, health policy and practice.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33133784
doi: 10.7717/peerj.10202
pii: 10202
pmc: PMC7580574
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e10202Informations de copyright
©2020 Sandvoll et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare there are no competing interests.
Références
Geriatr Nurs. 2016 Mar-Apr;37(2):110-5
pubmed: 26626463
Nurs Ethics. 2013 Nov;20(7):748-61
pubmed: 23462504
Scand J Caring Sci. 2016 Jun;30(2):330-9
pubmed: 26058829
J Clin Nurs. 2016 Jul;25(13-14):1805-34
pubmed: 27030571
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2013 Jan-Feb;56(1):250-7
pubmed: 23022056
J Aging Stud. 2015 Dec;35:201-10
pubmed: 26568229
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014 Feb;62(2):371-7
pubmed: 24433350
Occup Ther Int. 2011 Mar;18(1):4-17
pubmed: 20931622
BMC Nurs. 2015 Jul 30;14:40
pubmed: 26229519
J Adv Nurs. 2017 Aug;73(8):1884-1895
pubmed: 28229474
Scand J Caring Sci. 2004 Mar;18(1):65-71
pubmed: 15005665
Aging Ment Health. 2006 Sep;10(5):454-66
pubmed: 16938681
Md State Med J. 1965 Feb;14:61-5
pubmed: 14258950
Scand J Caring Sci. 2006 Jun;20(2):177-83
pubmed: 16756523
Int J Nurs Stud. 2017 Nov;76:36-44
pubmed: 28915416
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007 Sep;22(9):843-9
pubmed: 17193341
J Clin Nurs. 2011 Nov;20(21-22):3111-8
pubmed: 21592245
Scand J Caring Sci. 2017 Dec;31(4):718-726
pubmed: 27910119
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Aug;27(15-16):3070-3080
pubmed: 29679459
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 15;12(6):e0178383
pubmed: 28617837
Nurs Res. 2015 Mar-Apr;64(2):88-99
pubmed: 25738620
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Nov 13;15:508
pubmed: 26566784
Age Ageing. 2013 Nov;42(6):682-8
pubmed: 24004604
Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont). 2016;29(1):17-25
pubmed: 27309638
BMC Geriatr. 2007 Jun 19;7:13
pubmed: 17578574
BMC Nurs. 2012 Jun 07;11:7
pubmed: 22676435