Free Nipple Grafting and Nipple Sharing in Autologous Breast Reconstruction after Mastectomy.


Journal

Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open
ISSN: 2169-7574
Titre abrégé: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101622231

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2020
Historique:
received: 08 07 2020
accepted: 03 08 2020
entrez: 2 11 2020
pubmed: 3 11 2020
medline: 3 11 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Nipple sparing mastectomy is gaining popularity in recent years, as it provides superior aesthetic results and has a positive impact on the psychological well-being of patients. However, patients with macromastia and high grade ptosis are not good candidates for nipple sparing mastectomy due to a high risk for nipple necrosis; for these patients, the free nipple grafting (FNG) is an excellent option following autologous reconstruction. We herein present our experience with FNG for women with large and ptotic breasts undergoing mastectomy and autologous reconstruction. We also present the option of splitting a single nipple-areolar complex to provide 2 grafts for bilateral nipple reconstruction. This retrospective study is based on data collected between 2014 and 2019 at a single institution. We report on 7 patients (13 grafts): 5 patients underwent FNG (4 bilateral, 1 unilateral) and 2 patients had a single nipple split into 2 parts to create 2 nipple-areolar complexes. Of the 13 grafts, 9 had complete take, 3 had almost complete take, and only 1 graft was lost. Overall patient satisfaction from the procedure was high. The use of FNG is an excellent reconstructive option, as it preserves the patient's own nipple in terms of color, shape, and texture. The procedure can be executed as part of a direct single-staged reconstruction for patients who are at a high risk for nipple necrosis.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33133977
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003138
pmc: PMC7544275
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e3138

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Disclosure: The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article.

Références

Ann Plast Surg. 2018 Jul;81(1):22-27
pubmed: 29746276
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012 Feb;38(2):125-9
pubmed: 22056645
Ann Plast Surg. 2014;72(6):S112-5
pubmed: 24374396
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1973 Feb;51(2):176-8
pubmed: 4683940
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Nov;160(1):111-120
pubmed: 27620883
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011 Mar;64(3):360-3
pubmed: 20570584
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Mar;125(3):818-29
pubmed: 20195110
Gland Surg. 2015 Jun;4(3):257-62
pubmed: 26161310
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Mar;129(3):572-81
pubmed: 22373964
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1989 Winter;13(1):55-8
pubmed: 2658498

Auteurs

Dana Egozi (D)

Department of Plastic Surgery, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel.
Hebrew University Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel.

Tanir M Allwies (TM)

Hebrew University Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel.
Department of General Surgery and Breast Health Center, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel.

Ron Fishel (R)

Department of Plastic Surgery, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel.

Eliran Jacobi (E)

Department of Plastic Surgery, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel.

Moran Lemberger (M)

Department of Plastic Surgery, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel.

Classifications MeSH