Neuron-Specific Enolase Levels in Adults Under Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.
extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
neuron-specific enolase
outcome
stroke
Journal
Critical care explorations
ISSN: 2639-8028
Titre abrégé: Crit Care Explor
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101746347
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2020
Oct 2020
Historique:
entrez:
2
11
2020
pubmed:
3
11
2020
medline:
3
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
We aimed to determine if elevations in serum neuron-specific enolase are associated with brain injury and outcomes in adults who require venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Prospective observational study. Two ICUs of a university hospital, Paris, France. Consecutive adult patients treated with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiogenic shock or in-hospital refractory cardiac arrest. None. Serum sampled 1, 3, and 7 days after venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cannulation was stored at -80°C and neuron-specific enolase concentrations were measured in batches at the end of the study. The association between neuron-specific enolase concentrations and outcomes (28-d mortality and poor outcome, defined by a score of 4-6 on the modified Rankin scale at 90 d) were explored by multivariable logistic regression, with neuron-specific enolase concentrations dichotomized according to median values. One-hundred three patients were included, of whom 26 (25%) received preextracorporeal membrane oxygenation cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Median (interquartile range) day-1, day-3, and day-7 neuron-specific enolase serum concentrations were 37 μg/L (26-51 μg/L), 25 μg/L (19-37) μg/L, and 22 μg/L (17-31 μg/L). After adjustment for Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, preextracorporeal membrane oxygenation cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and Sepsis Organ Failure Assessment score at time of cannulation, a day-3 neuron-specific enolase greater than 25 μg/L remained independently associated with 28-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 4.98; 95% CI, 1.86-13.32) and poor outcome at 90 days (adjusted odds ratio, 4.63; 95% CI, 1.81-11.84). A day-3 neuron-specific enolase threshold greater than 80 μg/L had a 100% specificity for prediction of both mortality (95% CI, 92-100%) and poor functional outcome (95% CI, 89-100%). In a subset of patients who underwent brain CT, neuron-specific enolase concentrations were significantly higher in patients diagnosed with stroke, as compared with those without stroke. In adult patients under venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, day-3 serum neuron-specific enolase concentrations are independently associated with short-term mortality and poor functional outcomes. These findings deserve validation in a multicenter setting.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33134937
doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000239
pmc: PMC7566864
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e0239Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Dr. Sonneville received grants from the French Ministry of Health, the French Society of Intensive Care Medicine (Société de Réanimation de Langue Française) and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, and lecture fees from Baxter. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.
Références
Eur Heart J. 2015 Sep 1;36(33):2246-56
pubmed: 26033984
Resuscitation. 2019 Mar;136:14-20
pubmed: 30654013
Circulation. 2020 Mar 17;141(11):887-890
pubmed: 32176540
Circulation. 2020 Mar 17;141(11):877-886
pubmed: 31896278
Lancet. 1974 Jul 13;2(7872):81-4
pubmed: 4136544
Crit Care Med. 2008 May;36(5):1404-11
pubmed: 18434909
Resuscitation. 2017 Dec;121:166-171
pubmed: 28916477
Resuscitation. 2017 Mar;112:34-40
pubmed: 27993632
Crit Care Med. 2020 Jul;48(7):e611-e619
pubmed: 32332280
Stroke. 2010 May;41(5):1048-50
pubmed: 20224060
Intensive Care Med. 2020 May;46(5):1027-1029
pubmed: 32206844
Neurocrit Care. 2014 Jun;20(3):367-74
pubmed: 23860667
JAMA. 1993 Dec 22-29;270(24):2957-63
pubmed: 8254858
Crit Care Med. 2019 Dec;47(12):1773-1781
pubmed: 31599814
Clin EEG Neurosci. 2019 Dec 11;:1550059419892757
pubmed: 31823652
Ann Intensive Care. 2018 Dec 20;8(1):129
pubmed: 30570687
Crit Care Med. 2015 Oct;43(10):2202-11
pubmed: 26082978
Intensive Care Med. 2014 Dec;40(12):1816-31
pubmed: 25398304
ASAIO J. 2020 Apr;66(4):388-393
pubmed: 31045914
Crit Care Res Pract. 2018 Mar 18;2018:3237810
pubmed: 29744226
Crit Care Med. 2016 Oct;44(10):e964-72
pubmed: 27340754
JAMA. 2003 Jun 11;289(22):2983-91
pubmed: 12799407
Intensive Care Med. 1996 Jul;22(7):707-10
pubmed: 8844239
Crit Care Med. 2018 May;46(5):e389-e394
pubmed: 29389771
Crit Care Med. 2018 Sep;46(9):1506-1513
pubmed: 29782356