Correlation between the NGF levels and questionnaire forms in patients receiving antimuscarinic treatment and those receiving onabotulinum toxin-A injection.


Journal

Turkish journal of urology
ISSN: 2149-3235
Titre abrégé: Turk J Urol
Pays: Turkey
ID NLM: 101643563

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
May 2021
Historique:
received: 14 09 2020
accepted: 15 10 2020
pubmed: 3 11 2020
medline: 3 11 2020
entrez: 2 11 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To compare nerve growth factor (NGF) levels in patients who received antimuscarinic, versus onabotulinum toxin-A (onaBoNT-A) injection, as well as to investigate whether there is a correlation between NGF levels, and 8-item overactive bladder questionnaire(OAB-V8), urogenital distress inventory (UDI)-6, and incontinence impact questionnaire (IIQ)-7 forms. Fourty adult patients with OAB were enrolled in this prospective study. An antimuscarinic was prescribed to 20 naive patients, and onaBoNT-A injection was administered to 20 patients, who were refractory to antimuscarinics. Urine samples were obtained before, and after 3 There was no significant difference between groups in terms of the initial OAB-V8, IIQ-7, and UDI-6 scores, whereas NGF values showed no significant difference over time in onaBoNT-A group (p=0.069, p=0.069). NGF levels were significantly lower in 3 NGF level might be a good marker to evaluate effectiveness of treatment in patients receiving antimuscarinics, owing to correlation of urinary NGF levels with symptom scores. Lack of correlation in patients receiving onaBoNT-A injection could be a result of differences in the mechanism of action.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33135996
pii: tud.2020.20432
doi: 10.5152/tud.2020.20432
pmc: PMC8260081
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

223-228

Références

Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2006 Feb;3(2):101-10
pubmed: 16470209
Toxins (Basel). 2016 Feb 29;8(3):
pubmed: 26938559
Neurourol Urodyn. 2011 Nov;30(8):1525-9
pubmed: 21826717
Adv Urol. 2011;2011:382431
pubmed: 21687625
Br J Pharmacol. 2006 Feb;147 Suppl 2:S80-7
pubmed: 16465186
Eur Urol Focus. 2019 May;5(3):329-336
pubmed: 31231010
J Urol. 2013 Jan;189(1):359-65
pubmed: 23174241
Int Neurourol J. 2017 Dec;21(4):270-281
pubmed: 29298466
Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Jul;24(7):1065-72
pubmed: 23314226
BJU Int. 2013 Mar;111(3):372-80
pubmed: 23444927
J Urol. 2006 May;175(5):1773-6; discussion 1776
pubmed: 16600756
Neurourol Urodyn. 2017 Feb;36(2):390-393
pubmed: 26661444
Yonsei Med J. 2015 Jan;56(1):204-11
pubmed: 25510766
Neurourol Urodyn. 2007;26(1):129-33
pubmed: 17083117
Genet Mol Res. 2014 Apr 14;13(4):8609-19
pubmed: 24782215

Auteurs

Süleyman Sağır (S)

Department of Urology, Gaziantep University Faculty of Medicine, Gaziantep, Turkey.

Ömer Bayrak (Ö)

Department of Urology, Gaziantep University Faculty of Medicine, Gaziantep, Turkey.

Haluk Şen (H)

Department of Urology, Gaziantep University Faculty of Medicine, Gaziantep, Turkey.

Seval Kul (S)

Department of Bioistatistic, Gaziantep University Faculty of Medicine, Gaziantep, Turkey.

Sakıp Erturhan (S)

Department of Urology, Gaziantep University Faculty of Medicine, Gaziantep, Turkey.

İlker Seçkiner (İ)

Department of Urology, Gaziantep University Faculty of Medicine, Gaziantep, Turkey.

Classifications MeSH