Spiral Ganglions and Speech Perception in the Elderly. Which Turn of the Cochlea is the More Relevant? A Preliminary Study on Human Temporal Bones.
Journal
The journal of international advanced otology
ISSN: 2148-3817
Titre abrégé: J Int Adv Otol
Pays: Turkey
ID NLM: 101522982
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2020
12 2020
Historique:
entrez:
2
11
2020
pubmed:
3
11
2020
medline:
23
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To identify the cochlear segment in which spiral ganglion neuron (SGN) loss may more severely impact discrimination thresholds. Thirteen temporal bones from 13 subjects between 55 and 77 years of age were analyzed. The organ of corti was analyzed to identify the loss of hair cells, and the number of SGNs in each cochlear segment were counted. The results of the speech perception test (SPT) and pure tone audiometry (PTA) tests were collected. PTA averages for low and high frequencies were calculated. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Pearson, Spearman, and multilinear regression tests were performed. No statistically significant correlation was identified between the patient's age and number of SGNs. Statistically significant differences were observed between the number of SGNs in the different cochlear segments (one-way ANOVA: p<0.0001) and between poor PTA average and SPT scores (negative correlation) (p=0.03). A statistically significant correlation was identified between the overall number of cochlear SGNs and SPT scores (p=0.02) and between the number of SGNs in cochlear segments I (p=0.04) and II and the SPT score (p=0.03). We identified that residual SGNs in the basal and middle turns of the cochlea might be determinants of speech perception.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33136010
doi: 10.5152/iao.2020.8481
pmc: PMC7901449
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
318-322Références
Otol Neurotol. 2014 Sep;35(8):1446-50
pubmed: 25120196
Hearing Balance Commun. 2018;16(2):74-82
pubmed: 30931204
Am J Otolaryngol. 2019 Jan - Feb;40(1):1-9
pubmed: 30327149
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Oct;276(10):2673-2680
pubmed: 31177325
J Neurosci Res. 2020 Sep;98(9):1674-1684
pubmed: 31066107
HNO. 2008 Apr;56(4):457-60
pubmed: 18351308
J Int Adv Otol. 2018 Aug;14(2):181-189
pubmed: 30256195
Laryngoscope. 2005 Apr;115(4):672-7
pubmed: 15805879
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg. 1986;40(2):377-85
pubmed: 3751531
Hear Res. 2016 Mar;333:225-234
pubmed: 26341474
J Neurosci. 2013 Feb 27;33(9):4011-23
pubmed: 23447610
Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2012 Nov;295(11):1791-811
pubmed: 23044521
Trans Am Laryngol Rhinol Otol Soc. 1955;(59th Meeting):401-18; discussion, 419-20
pubmed: 13311981
Audiol Neurootol. 2010;15(5):323-31
pubmed: 20203481
Otol Neurotol. 2001 May;22(3):340-9
pubmed: 11347637
Dis Mon. 2013 Apr;59(4):147-56
pubmed: 23507354
Sci Rep. 2016 Sep 16;6:33288
pubmed: 27633610
Otol Neurotol. 2009 Apr;30(3):418-422
pubmed: 19326501
J Int Adv Otol. 2019 Aug;15(2):215-221
pubmed: 31418713
Otol Neurotol. 2018 Mar;39(3):284-293
pubmed: 29342037
Neurol Sci. 2020 Jul;41(7):1891-1898
pubmed: 32095945
J Neurosci. 2012 Jan 11;32(2):405-10
pubmed: 22238076
J Clin Invest. 2005 Mar;115(3):500-8
pubmed: 15765131
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1989 Jun;98(6):411-6
pubmed: 2729822
Otol Neurotol. 2014 Oct;35(9):1545-51
pubmed: 25122600