Patient-reported experience measure in pancreatobiliary endoscopy: a systematic review to highlight areas for improvement.
Journal
European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology
ISSN: 1473-5687
Titre abrégé: Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9000874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 06 2021
01 06 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
3
11
2020
medline:
10
8
2021
entrez:
2
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Increasing attention is paid to measure patient's experience using specific patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) as tool to assess the overall quality of care provided. The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and the United European Gastroenterology have recognized the measure of quality of endoscopy facilities as a priority to provide an adequate service. However, although some studies included patient satisfaction measurement, specific PREMs for gastrointestinal endoscopy are limited, especially in the field of pancreatobiliary endoscopy, with heterogeneous methods and results. This study is aimed at systematically reviewing the literature to summarize the available PREMs for pancreatobiliary endoscopy and to highlight areas of implementation. PubMed, Embase and Scopus were searched until February 2020. The search initially retrieved 1064 articles, but only six were includable. The identified studies employed several methods to measure patient's experience, with the most frequently used questionnaires being Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Satisfaction Questionnaire and Group Health Association of America-9. The following areas that need implementation were identified: (a) evaluation of pain is one of the most investigated areas but seems marginal, as most pancreatobiliary endoscopic procedures are performed under deep sedation; (b) endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography are considered as a whole, but they have very different indication and contexts (e.g. inpatients or outpatients); (c) 'experience' and 'satisfaction' are wrongly considered as synonyms; (d) the optimal modality and timing of questionnaire administration are unclear. There are few tools to measure PREMS in pancreatobiliary endoscopy with several limitations. We have, therefore, started the process of building a specific PREM tool for pancreatobiliary EUS.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33136730
pii: 00042737-202106000-00008
doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001957
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
832-838Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
Valori R, Cortas G, de Lange T, Salem Balfaqih O, de Pater M, Eisendrath P, et al. Performance measures for endoscopy services: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative. United European Gastroenterol J. 2019; 7:21–44.
LaVela SL, Gallan AS. Evaluation and measurement of patient experience. Patient Exp J. 2014; 1:5.
Tierney M, Bevan R, Rees CJ, Trebble TM. What do patients want from their endoscopy experience? The importance of measuring and understanding patient attitudes to their care. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2016; 7:191–198.
Zucca A, Sanson-Fisher R, Waller A, Carey M, Boadle D. The first step in ensuring patient-centred quality of care: ask the patient. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2017; 26. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12435.
doi: 10.1111/ecc.12435
Neilson LJ, Patterson J, von Wagner C, Hewitson P, McGregor LM, Sharp L, Rees CJ. Patient experience of gastrointestinal endoscopy: informing the development of the Newcastle ENDOPREM™. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2020; 11:209–217.
McEntire J, Sahota J, Hydes T, Trebble TM. An evaluation of patient attitudes to colonoscopy and the importance of endoscopist interaction and the endoscopy environment to satisfaction and value. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2013; 48:366–373.
Jenkinson C, Coulter A, Bruster S. The Picker Patient Experience Questionnaire: development and validation using data from in-patient surveys in five countries. Int J Qual Health Care. 2002; 14:353–358.
Brown S, Bevan R, Rubin G, Nixon C, Dunn S, Panter S, Rees CJ. Patient-derived measures of GI endoscopy: a meta-narrative review of the literature. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015; 81:1130–40.e1.
Yacavone RF, Locke GR 3rd, Gostout CJ, Rockwood TH, Thieling S, Zinsmeister AR. Factors influencing patient satisfaction with GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001; 53:703–710.
Black N, Jenkinson C. Measuring patients’ experiences and outcomes. BMJ. 2009; 339:b2495.
Cinocca S, Rucci P, Randazzo C, Teale E, Pianori D, Ciotti E, Fantini MP. Validation of the Italian version of the Patient Reported Experience Measures for intermediate care services. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017; 11:1671–1676.
Rutter MD, Senore C, Bisschops R, Domagk D, Valori R, Kaminski MF, et al. The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Quality Improvement Initiative: developing performance measures. Endoscopy. 2016; 48:81–89.
Domagk D, Oppong KW, Aabakken L, Czakó L, Gyökeres T, Manes G, et al. Performance measures for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasound: A European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative. United European Gastroenterol J. 2018; 6:1448–1460.
Etingen B, Miskevics S, LaVela SL. Assessing the associations of patient-reported perceptions of patient-centered care as supplemental measures of health care quality in VA. J Gen Intern Med. 2016; 31 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):10–20.
Hutchings HA, Cheung WY, Alrubaiy L, Durai D, Russell IT, Williams JG. Development and validation of the gastrointestinal endoscopy satisfaction questionnaire (GESQ). Endoscopy. 2015; 47:1137–1143.
Seip B, Huppertz-Hauss G, Sauar J, Bretthauer M, Hoff G. Patients’ satisfaction: an important factor in quality control of gastroscopies. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2008; 43:1004–1011.
Cohen L, Delaney P, Boston P. Listening to the customer: implementing a patient satisfaction measurement system. Gastroenterol Nurs. 1994; 17:110–115.
Dougall A, Russell A, Rubin G, Ling J. Rethinking patient satisfaction: patient experiences of an open access flexible sigmoidoscopy service. Soc Sci Med. 2000; 50:53–62.
Denters MJ, Deutekom M, Derkx B, Bossuyt PM, Fockens P, Dekker E. Patient satisfaction with the colonoscopy procedure: endoscopists overestimate the importance of adverse physical symptoms. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2012; 3:130–136.
Yanai H, Schushan-Eisen I, Neuman S, Novis B. Patient satisfaction with endoscopy measurement and assessment. Dig Dis. 2008; 26:75–79.
Ko HH, Zhang H, Telford JJ, Enns R. Factors influencing patient satisfaction when undergoing endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009; 69:883–891, quiz 891.e1.
Parihar V, Moran C, Maheshwari P, Cheriyan D, O’Toole A, Murray F, et al. Measuring the value of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography activity: an opportunity to stratify endoscopists on the basis of their value. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018; 30:718–721.
Parihar V, Basir Y, Nally D, Mellotte G, Manoharan T, Walker C, et al. A novel value-based scoring system for endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections: a single-centre comparative study of plastic and lumen-apposing metal stents (NOVA study). Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020. [published online ahead of print, 2020 Aug 14]. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001891.
doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001891
Burtea D, Dimitriu A, Maloş A, Cherciu I, Săftoiu A. Assessment of the quality of outpatient endoscopic procedures by using a patient satisfaction questionnaire. Curr Health Sci J. 2019; 45:52–58.
Cabadas Avion R, Ojea Cendón M, Leal Ruiloba MS, Baluja González MA, Sobrino Ramallo J, Álvarez Escudero J. Prospective analysis of the complications, efficacy, and satisfaction level on the sedation performed by anaesthetists in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Análisis prospectivo de las complicaciones, eficacia y grado de satisfacción en la sedación realizada por anestesiólogos en endoscopia digestiva. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2018; 65:504–513.
Mortensen MB, Fristrup C, Holm FS, Pless T, Durup J, Ainsworth AP, et al. Prospective evaluation of patient tolerability, satisfaction with patient information, and complications in endoscopic ultrasonography. Endoscopy. 2005; 37:146–153.
Masci E, Rossi M, Minoli G, Mangiavillano B, Bianchi G, Colombo E, et al. Patient satisfaction after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for biliary stones: a prospective multicenter study in Lombardy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009; 24:1510–1515.
Glomsaker TB, Hoff G, Kvaløy JT, Søreide K, Aabakken L, Søreide JA; Norwegian Gastronet ERCP Group. Patient-reported outcome measures after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a prospective, multicentre study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2013; 48:868–876.
Colton JB, Curran CC. Quality indicators, including complications, of ERCP in a community setting: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009; 70:457–467.
Veldhuijzen G, de Jong MJP, Roosen CM, Siersema PD, Drenth JPH, van Esch AAJ. The gastrointestinal endoscopy satisfaction questionnaire captures patient satisfaction as a key quality indicator of gastrointestinal endoscopy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020; 32:832–837.
Yoon JY, Cha JM, Kwak MS, Jeon JW, Shin HP, Joo KR, Lee JI. Gastrointestinal endoscopy satisfaction questionnaire is a valid tool to measure patient satisfaction in Asian country. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018; 97:e11477.
Davies AR, Ware JE Jr. GHAA’s consumer satisfaction survey and user’s manual. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Group Health Association of America; 1991.
Faigel DO, Pike IM, Baron TH, Chak A, Cohen J, Deal SE, et al.; ASGE/ACG Taskforce on Quality in Endoscopy. Quality indicators for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: an introduction. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006; 101:866–872.
Ware JE Jr, Davies-Avery A, Stewart AL. The measurement and meaning of patient satisfaction. Health Med Care Serv Rev. 1978; 1:1, 3–1,15.
MacIntosh D, Dubé C, Hollingworth R, Veldhuyzen van Zanten S, Daniels S, Ghattas G. The endoscopy Global Rating Scale-Canada: development and implementation of a quality improvement tool. Can J Gastroenterol. 2013; 27:74–82.
Uzman S, Gurbulak B, Gurbulak EK, Donmez T, Hut A, Yildirim D. A comparison of propofol and midazolam/meperidine sedation in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2016; 11:178–185.
Browne K, Roseman D, Shaller D, Edgman-Levitan S. Analysis & commentary. Measuring patient experience as a strategy for improving primary care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010; 29:921–925.
JAG Joint Advisory Group on GI Endoscopy. Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (JAG) accreditation standards for endoscopy services. Royal College of Physicians. Available from https://www.thejag.org.uk/Downloads/JAG/Accreditation/JAG%20accreditation%20standards%20for%20endoscopy%20services.pdf . [Online, 26.06.2020].
JAG Joint Advisory Group on GI Endoscopy. Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (JAG) Guidance non-acute GRS standards UK. Royal College of Physicians. April 2016. Available from https://www.thejag.org.uk/Downloads/JAG/Accreditation%20-%20Global%20Rating%20Scale%20(GRS)/Guidance%20-%20non-acute%20GRS%20standards%20UK.pdf . [Online, Accessed 26.06.2020].
Beattie M, Murphy DJ, Atherton I, Lauder W. Instruments to measure patient experience of healthcare quality in hospitals: a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2015; 4:97.